13.07.2015 Views

columbia river basin fish and wildlife program annual ...

columbia river basin fish and wildlife program annual ...

columbia river basin fish and wildlife program annual ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.126.12 CONTINUING COORDINATION AND CONSULTATION(By All Federal Project Operators/Regulators)1203(c) [Abstract] The Federal project operators <strong>and</strong> regulators shall workwith the agencies <strong>and</strong> Tribes to comply with theconsultation/coordination requirements of the Act. The Councilexpects research planning consultation to occur among agencies,Tribes, <strong>and</strong> project operators <strong>and</strong> regulators. The Council willencourage improved coordination of <strong>fish</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>wildlife</strong> efforts byconsulting with the <strong>fish</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>wildlife</strong> agencies, Tribes, projectoperators <strong>and</strong> regulators, BPA customers, Federal <strong>and</strong> state water <strong>and</strong>l<strong>and</strong> management agencies, irrigation districts, academic experts, <strong>and</strong>interested citizens groups.ACTION ITEM ACTIVITY SUMMARY:Objectives:In conjunction with the Council <strong>and</strong> the Ad-Hoc Roles Committee ofCBFWA, BPA has participated in the development of a formal processthrough which BPA <strong>and</strong> the Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife agencies <strong>and</strong> Tribesjointly plan! <strong>and</strong> BPA subsequently implements, the Fish <strong>and</strong> WildlifeProgram. This process provides for the involvement of the region'sFish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife agencies <strong>and</strong> Tribes at relevant decision-makingpoints <strong>and</strong> should improve coordination <strong>and</strong> consistency between BPA'simplementation actions <strong>and</strong> the agencies' <strong>and</strong> Tribes' existing <strong>and</strong>future management activities.Background <strong>and</strong> Progress to Date:Plans:In early April 1987, BPA staff began meeting with Council staff <strong>and</strong>an ad-hoc committee of CBFWA. The meetings focused on explainingBPA's process for implementing the Program, from inception throughcompletion. Participants agreed to continue discussion, with a goalof developing a collaborative <strong>and</strong> cooperative process through whichBPA would plan <strong>and</strong> implement the Program. As a result of thesediscussions, an Implementation Planning Process (IPP) was developed(see Section III of the AIWP).The IPP was endorsed by the BPA Administrator <strong>and</strong> the CBFWA Chairmanon October 19, 1988. The IPP's Policy Review Group (PRG) was formedin late 1988. In January 1989, the PRG began providing BPA withpolicy <strong>and</strong> funding recommendations related to Programimplementation. The PRG continues to serve a forum for policycoordination <strong>and</strong> consultation among BPA, <strong>fish</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>wildlife</strong> agencies,Tribes, utility interests, Council, <strong>and</strong> other interested parties.The AIWP is based on the outline developed by the PRG during Step 1of the <strong>annual</strong> IPP cycle.BPA plans to continue to use the IPP as a coordination <strong>and</strong>consultation mechanism <strong>and</strong> to develop the AIWP.1 6 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!