13.07.2015 Views

Demand-Driven Technologies for Sustainable Maize ... - IITA

Demand-Driven Technologies for Sustainable Maize ... - IITA

Demand-Driven Technologies for Sustainable Maize ... - IITA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

922Table 3: Average proportion of the interaction variation explained ( ˆR ) whentwo environment index vectors are used in AMMI model <strong>for</strong> theanalysis data set consisting of 40 genotypes and 9 environments(subset of the CIMMYT ISWYN data <strong>for</strong> 1967–1968).Target Set Self Index Complement Index Mandel’s Simulation1–41–51–81–101–20695852494338363433246154413930Mean 54 33 45wheat nursery yield trials (ISWYN) conducted by the International<strong>Maize</strong> and Wheat Improvement Centre, Mexico (CIMMYT) in 1967–1968. The cultivars represented the principal types of spring wheatgrown throughout the world. Their parentage, origin and aspects oftheir agronomic characters, disease resistance and quality have beendescribed by Mackenzie et al. (1971). The trials, which consisted of40 genotypes, were conducted in 45 environments (9 out of the45 environments were analysed in this section) using a randomisedcomplete block design with three replications. The set of 40 genotypesby 9 environments by 3 replications was randomly split into 10 targetsets of 4 genotypes by 9 environments by 3 replications each (4 x 9x 3 data matrix), and the two index vectors were estimated <strong>for</strong> eachof the ten target sets as explained in the previous section. Thus, <strong>for</strong>the analysis based on the complement index vector, a target set offour genotypes was analysed using an index vector estimated from36 genotypes x 9 environments x 3 replications. For each target set,the proportion of the interaction variation explained from regressingeach genotype’s vector of the residual interaction matrix on eachof the corresponding environment index vector was calculated and2the average ˆR value was computed <strong>for</strong> the set of ten target sets.The analysis was repeated <strong>for</strong> different target sets of sizes 5, 8, 10 and20 genotypes. The per<strong>for</strong>mance data of the two index vectors in terms2of ˆR values are presented in Table 3. The last column of Table 3 listsexpected ˆR 2 values <strong>for</strong> corresponding target set sizes <strong>for</strong> Mandel’ssimulation (Mandel, 1971), which may be read directly from Mandel’s2tables. If we compare average ˆR values based on the Self-indexvector with corresponding values from Mandel’s simulated values<strong>for</strong> the fi ve different target set sizes, then there is invariably goodevidence that the interaction is not zero. This evidence points to theconclusion that there are almost always strong indications of genotype× environment interactions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!