13.07.2015 Views

Demand-Driven Technologies for Sustainable Maize ... - IITA

Demand-Driven Technologies for Sustainable Maize ... - IITA

Demand-Driven Technologies for Sustainable Maize ... - IITA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The larger GCA than SCA mean squares implies that, althoughnon-additive gene action, especially dominance, plays an important partin the inheritance of the traits evaluated in this study, additive geneaction is by far more important. However, estimates of additive effectswould be greatly infl uenced by the environmental conditions of theevaluation trials. There<strong>for</strong>e, recurrent selection could be used to improvethe per<strong>for</strong>mance of the population developed from the lines while thelines per se or their derivatives could be used to develop Striga-resistantsingle-cross hybrids that would be released to farmers.In the present study, greater attention was focused on Striga hostdamage score and number of emerged Striga plants 10 weeks afterplanting because of the use of Z. diploperennis as the donor parent<strong>for</strong> Striga resistance genes. The grain-yield per<strong>for</strong>mance of the lines inhybrid combinations was also considered to be important. Estimates ofthe GCA effect <strong>for</strong> each line, which is the average per<strong>for</strong>mance of theline in hybrid combination with other lines in the study, are presented<strong>for</strong> the three traits in Tables 5, 6 and 7. For Striga host damage scoreand number of emerged Striga plants at 10 weeks after planting,signifi cant negative GCA effect indicates tolerance/resistance while <strong>for</strong>grain yield, signifi cant positive GCA value is desirable. Judging by thereaction of the lines to S. hermonthica as presented in Table 1, all theZd lines and TZL TC87 were expected to have negative GCA values<strong>for</strong> Striga host damage score and number of emerged Striga plants,and positive values <strong>for</strong> grain yield. On the other hand, the standardinbreds would have positive values <strong>for</strong> the fi rst two traits and negativevalues <strong>for</strong> grain yield.Proportions of signifi cant positive and negative GCA values <strong>for</strong> thethree traits are summarized in Table 8 <strong>for</strong> the three groups of lines inthe study (that is, Zd lines, TZL TC87 and the standard inbreds) andin Table 9 <strong>for</strong> the individual lines. Of the 40 possible values <strong>for</strong> the Zdlines, 17 and 18 (42.5 and 45%) were negative <strong>for</strong> emerged Strigaplants and Striga host damage score. Corresponding values <strong>for</strong> TZLTC87 were 3 and 2 (37.5 and 25%) <strong>for</strong> the two traits. The two groupsof inbreds had few or no positive values <strong>for</strong> the two traits. On thecontrary, 53% of the values <strong>for</strong> the four standard inbreds were positive<strong>for</strong> Striga host damage score and 12.5% <strong>for</strong> emerged Striga plants.For grain yield, 55 and 50% of the GCA values <strong>for</strong> Zd linesand TZL TC87 were positive (Table 8). The four standard inbredshad only 6.3% positive values compared with 50% negative values.These results indicated that, indeed, the Zd lines and TZL TC87 weretolerant/resistant to S. hermonthica while the standard inbreds weresusceptible.In this study as in previous ones (Efron 1993; Efron et al. 1989;Kim 1991; 1994; 1996; Kim et al. 1997; Kim and Adetimirin 1997),71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!