The Spatial Concentration of Subsidized Housing - Poverty & Race ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Harris, L. E. (1999). A home is more than just a house: A spatial analysis of housingfor the poor in metropolitan America. Unpublished Ph.D., State University ofNew York at Albany, United States -- New York.Hartung, J. M., & Henig, J. R. (1997). Housing vouchers and certificates as a vehiclefor deconcentrating the poor - Evidence from the Washington, DC,Metropolitan area. Urban Affairs Review, 32(3), 403-419.Holloway, S. R., Bryan, D., Chabot, R., Rogers, D. M., & Rulli, J. (1998). Exploringthe Effect of Public Housing on the Concentration of Poverty in Columbus,Ohio. Urban Affairs Review, 33(6), 767-789.Iceland, J., & Steinmetz, E. (2003). The Effects of Using Census Block Groups Insteadof Census Tracts When Examining Residential Housing Patterns. Washington,DC: U.S. Census Bureau.James, R. N., & Iii. (2008). Impact of Subsidized Rental Housing Characteristics onMetropolitan Residential Satisfaction. Journal of Urban Planning andDevelopment, 134(4), 166-172.Jargowsky, P. A. (1997). Poverty and Place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.140
Jargowsky, P. A. (2005a). Response to George C. Galster's "Consequences From theRedistribution of Urban Poverty During the 1990s: A Cautionary Tale".Economic Development Quarterly, 19(2), 133-135.Jargowsky, P. A. (2005b). Stunning Progress, Hidden Problems: The DramaticDecline of Concentrated Poverty in the 1990's. In A. Berube, B. Katz & R. E.Lang (Eds.), Redefining Urban & Suburban America: Evidence from Census2000 (Vol. 2, pp. 137-171). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.Jargowsky, P. A., & Kim, J. (2005). A Measure of Spatial Segregation: TheGeneralized Neighborhood Sorting Index (No. 05-03). Ann Arbor, MI:National Poverty Center.Joassart-Marcelli, P. (2007). Closing the gap between places of work and residence:The role of rental housing assistance in southern California. Housing PolicyDebate, 18(1), 107-144.Joassart-Marcelli, P., Wolch, J., Alonso, A., & Sessoms, N. (2005). SpatialSegregation of the Poor in Southern California: A Multidimensional Analysis.Urban Geography, 26(7), 587-609.Johnson, M. P. (2001). A spatial decision support system prototype for housingmobility program planning. Journal of Geographical Systems, 3(1), 49-67.141
Page 1 and 2:
THE SPATIAL CONCENTRATION OF SUBSID
Page 3 and 4:
I certify that I have read this dis
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF TABLES ...
Page 7 and 8:
6.4 Summary of Cluster Analysis Res
Page 9 and 10:
Table 5.2 Range of MSA Segregation
Page 11 and 12:
ABSTRACTSubsidized housing has been
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1INTRODUCTIONPublic housing
Page 15 and 16:
Data on subsidized housing prior to
Page 17 and 18:
subsidy programs in that rents are
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 2LITERATURE REVIEWA compreh
Page 21 and 22:
from the nine matched neighborhood
Page 23 and 24:
Overall, it is clear that there are
Page 25 and 26:
limited the study to city vs. subur
Page 27 and 28:
to the public housing, location adj
Page 29 and 30:
hardship; and 2) public housing wea
Page 31 and 32:
deconcentrated over time is whether
Page 33 and 34:
deconcentration. In fact, a higher
Page 35 and 36:
in the same neighborhood). On avera
Page 37 and 38:
Concentration of Tenant-Based Subsi
Page 39 and 40:
Wang, Varady and Wang (2008) studie
Page 41 and 42:
from the vouchers. However, there w
Page 43 and 44:
consisting of single family zones,
Page 45 and 46:
early-mid 1990’s consisting of pu
Page 47 and 48:
Recent studies of individual housin
Page 49 and 50:
One of the criticisms of the HOPE V
Page 51 and 52:
that they are smaller scale, better
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 3METHODOLOGYWhile the conce
Page 55 and 56:
Data AvailabilityA limitation in th
Page 57 and 58:
just coming on line in the 1990’s
Page 59 and 60:
with 1,500 to 12,000 the minimum an
Page 61 and 62:
exclusion of these units is not pro
Page 63 and 64:
Unduplication of Subsidized UnitsDu
Page 65:
projects between 35.2 and 46.6 perc
Page 68 and 69:
Resulting Data for AnalysisAs a res
Page 70 and 71:
Lack of household level data will l
Page 72 and 73:
TABLE 4.2Mean Subsidized Housing Un
Page 74 and 75:
Measures of ConcentrationThree meas
Page 76 and 77:
TABLE 4.6Subsidized Units as a Perc
Page 78 and 79:
would have to be to be considered t
Page 80 and 81:
mean of 82 subsidized units per tra
Page 82 and 83:
Subsidized Housing by Type and Pove
Page 84 and 85:
TABLE 4.9Subsidized Units by Subsid
Page 86 and 87:
unemployment rate (.427), less than
Page 88 and 89:
TABLE 4.12Correlation Matrix (page
Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 4.12Correlation Matrix (page
Page 92 and 93:
spatial sensitivity because many di
Page 94 and 95:
It is possible that these census tr
Page 96 and 97:
only 8 MSA’s). The segregation in
Page 98 and 99:
The correlation between the subsidi
Page 100 and 101:
developing strategies to deconcentr
Page 102 and 103: y subsidy type. The correlation bet
Page 104 and 105: with a poverty rate of 9.2 percent.
Page 106 and 107: The cluster is relatively small con
Page 108 and 109: Cluster 7: Other Site-Based Units -
Page 110 and 111: the only cluster that had a signifi
Page 112 and 113: alter the perception of public hous
Page 114 and 115: VouchersVoucher type tracts are dom
Page 116 and 117: TABLE 6.1Subsidized Units by Cluste
Page 118 and 119: FIGURE 6.1Percent Census Tracts by
Page 120 and 121: FIGURE 6.5Census Tract Percent Rent
Page 122 and 123: Cluster - Concentration -PovertyCen
Page 124 and 125: strategies. The cluster map shows t
Page 126 and 127: FIGURE 6.9Map of Public Housing Uni
Page 128 and 129: Cluster 1: Voucher/No Subsidized Un
Page 130 and 131: considered moderately concentrated
Page 132 and 133: Cluster Analysis ResultsThe cluster
Page 134 and 135: tracts than other subsidy types it
Page 136 and 137: ecommend efforts to reduce the leve
Page 138 and 139: scale at which the impacts occur; 2
Page 140 and 141: units. Given the high cost of these
Page 142 and 143: REFERENCESAbt Associates, I. (2006)
Page 144 and 145: Briggs, X. d. S. (Ed.). (2005). The
Page 146 and 147: Deng, L. (2007). Comparing the effe
Page 148 and 149: Ellen, I. G., & Voicu, I. (2005). N
Page 150 and 151: Galster, G. C. (2005). Consequences
Page 154 and 155: Johnson, M. P. (2006). Single-perio
Page 156 and 157: Lee, B. A., Reardon, S. F., Firebau
Page 158 and 159: Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does Affordab
Page 160 and 161: implementing eight consent decrees.
Page 162 and 163: Schwartz, A. (1999). New York City
Page 164 and 165: Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (200
Page 166 and 167: APPENDIX A.1Downloadable Databases
Page 168 and 169: APPENDIX A.4Missing DataPublicHousi
Page 170 and 171: APPENDIX A.6Subsidized Housing Unit
Page 172 and 173: APPENDIX A.8Subsidized Housing Unit
Page 174 and 175: APPENDIX A.9Demographics by Cluster
Page 176 and 177: MSAFIPS MSA Name Population Voucher
Page 186 and 187: MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name Popu
Page 196 and 197: Author Date Data GeographyGalster a
Page 198 and 199: Author Date Data GeographyHolloway,
Page 200 and 201: Author Date Data GeographyType ofPr
Page 202 and 203:
Author Date Data GeographyMurray 19
Page 204 and 205:
Author Date Data GeographyLee 20081
Page 206 and 207:
Author Date Data GeographyOakley 20
Page 208 and 209:
Devine, Gray,Rubin andTaghavi (HUD)
Page 210 and 211:
Carlson,Haveman,Kaplan andWolfe 200
Page 212 and 213:
Newman andSchnare 1997Rohe andFreem
Page 214:
Galster andZobel 1998Freeman andBot
show all

The Spatial Concentration of Subsidized Housing - Poverty & Race ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?