MSAFIPS MSA Name Population Vouchers Public <strong>Housing</strong>Other Site Based(MF/S236/S8) LIHTC Total8780 Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, CA MSA 367,137 1,510 704 588 1,361 4,1638800 Waco, TX MSA 213,517 1,660 1,066 1,171 560 4,4578840 Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV PMSA 4,922,060 19,366 14,782 32,020 27,782 93,9508880 Waterbury, CT PMSA 229,064 934 820 4,257 414 6,4258920 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA MSA 128,012 1,137 91 1,132 217 2,5778940 Wausau, WI MSA 125,834 273 189 488 368 1,3188960 West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL MSA 1,128,748 4,303 2,326 1,967 4,334 12,9309000 Wheeling, WV-OH MSA 153,172 596 2,018 1,235 290 4,1399040 Wichita, KS MSA 545,220 2,024 912 2,361 2,705 8,0029080 Wichita Falls, TX MSA 140,518 739 774 912 322 2,7479140 Williamsport, PA MSA 120,044 457 672 469 286 1,8849160 Wilmington-Newark, DE-MD PMSA 586,216 2,568 1,899 3,697 1,985 10,1499200 Wilmington, NC MSA 233,450 1,662 1,416 711 897 4,6869240 Worcester, MA-CT PMSA 508,982 3,000 2,502 6,176 1,960 13,6389260 Yakima, WA MSA 222,581 425 290 796 832 2,3439270 Yolo, CA PMSA 168,660 1,237 421 1,104 969 3,7319280 York, PA MSA 381,751 1,128 1,060 893 799 3,8809320 Youngstown-Warren, OH MSA 594,746 2,425 3,513 3,608 1,619 11,1659340 Yuba City, CA MSA 139,149 666 213 733 192 1,8049360 Yuma, AZ MSA 160,026 1,049 394 248 581 2,272Total 225,666,050 1,182,557 772,810 1,254,601 716,915 4,026,883172
APPENDIX A.11Segregation Index (D) by MSA 2000MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name PopulationBlack-Non-BlackHispanic-Non-HispanicPoor-Non-Poor<strong>Subsidized</strong>-Non-<strong>Subsidized</strong>40 Abilene, TX MSA 125,062 0.3505 0.3778 0.3261 0.606880 Akron, OH PMSA 694,960 0.6429 0.3422 0.4221 0.6031120 Albany, GA MSA 120,822 0.5960 0.3479 0.3971 0.5292160 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY MSA 874,183 0.5979 0.3885 0.3914 0.5691200 Albuquerque, NM MSA 712,738 0.2843 0.3859 0.3284 0.5054220 Alexandria, LA MSA 126,337 0.5962 0.3890 0.3120 0.5074240 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA MSA 637,958 0.4967 0.6047 0.3945 0.5803280 Altoona, PA MSA 129,144 0.4567 0.4704 0.2698 0.5725320 Amarillo, TX MSA 217,858 0.5687 0.4236 0.3286 0.4570380 Anchorage, AK MSA 260,283 0.3203 0.2041 0.2943 0.4861440 Ann Arbor, MI PMSA 578,736 0.6052 0.3756 0.5029 0.6910450 Anniston, AL MSA 112,249 0.4987 0.3171 0.2755 0.6293460 Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah, WI MSA 358,365 0.4883 0.3214 0.2887 0.5273480 Asheville, NC MSA 225,965 0.5650 0.3378 0.2278 0.6205500 Athens, GA MSA 153,444 0.4437 0.4293 0.3933 0.6338520 Atlanta, GA MSA 4,112,198 0.6129 0.4618 0.3614 0.6678560 Atlantic-Cape May, NJ PMSA 354,878 0.5880 0.4423 0.3145 0.6898580 Auburn-Opelika, AL MSA 115,092 0.3756 0.2447 0.4407 0.5413600 Augusta-Aiken, GA-SC MSA 477,441 0.4428 0.2613 0.3016 0.5312640 Austin-San Marcos, TX MSA 1,247,329 0.4146 0.4068 0.4158 0.6783680 Bakersfield, CA MSA 651,083 0.4165 0.4886 0.3160 0.5335720 Baltimore, MD PMSA 2,543,268 0.6637 0.3459 0.4380 0.6212730 Bangor, ME MSA 83,033 0.3985 0.3858 0.3175 0.4529740 Barnstable-Yarmouth, MA MSA 162,571 0.3852 0.3624 0.2498 0.5100760 Baton Rouge, LA MSA 602,894 0.6430 0.3162 0.3926 0.6377840 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX MSA 380,080 0.6493 0.3856 0.3315 0.5801860 Bellingham, WA MSA 166,814 0.2952 0.2149 0.2939 0.4214870 Benton Harbor, MI MSA 162,453 0.7250 0.4102 0.3729 0.6347875 Bergen-Passaic, NJ PMSA 1,372,791 0.6253 0.5049 0.3916 0.5429880 Billings, MT MSA 129,352 0.3126 0.2650 0.2720 0.4282173
- Page 1 and 2:
THE SPATIAL CONCENTRATION OF SUBSID
- Page 3 and 4:
I certify that I have read this dis
- Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF TABLES ...
- Page 7 and 8:
6.4 Summary of Cluster Analysis Res
- Page 9 and 10:
Table 5.2 Range of MSA Segregation
- Page 11 and 12:
ABSTRACTSubsidized housing has been
- Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1INTRODUCTIONPublic housing
- Page 15 and 16:
Data on subsidized housing prior to
- Page 17 and 18:
subsidy programs in that rents are
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 2LITERATURE REVIEWA compreh
- Page 21 and 22:
from the nine matched neighborhood
- Page 23 and 24:
Overall, it is clear that there are
- Page 25 and 26:
limited the study to city vs. subur
- Page 27 and 28:
to the public housing, location adj
- Page 29 and 30:
hardship; and 2) public housing wea
- Page 31 and 32:
deconcentrated over time is whether
- Page 33 and 34:
deconcentration. In fact, a higher
- Page 35 and 36:
in the same neighborhood). On avera
- Page 37 and 38:
Concentration of Tenant-Based Subsi
- Page 39 and 40:
Wang, Varady and Wang (2008) studie
- Page 41 and 42:
from the vouchers. However, there w
- Page 43 and 44:
consisting of single family zones,
- Page 45 and 46:
early-mid 1990’s consisting of pu
- Page 47 and 48:
Recent studies of individual housin
- Page 49 and 50:
One of the criticisms of the HOPE V
- Page 51 and 52:
that they are smaller scale, better
- Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 3METHODOLOGYWhile the conce
- Page 55 and 56:
Data AvailabilityA limitation in th
- Page 57 and 58:
just coming on line in the 1990’s
- Page 59 and 60:
with 1,500 to 12,000 the minimum an
- Page 61 and 62:
exclusion of these units is not pro
- Page 63 and 64:
Unduplication of Subsidized UnitsDu
- Page 65:
projects between 35.2 and 46.6 perc
- Page 68 and 69:
Resulting Data for AnalysisAs a res
- Page 70 and 71:
Lack of household level data will l
- Page 72 and 73:
TABLE 4.2Mean Subsidized Housing Un
- Page 74 and 75:
Measures of ConcentrationThree meas
- Page 76 and 77:
TABLE 4.6Subsidized Units as a Perc
- Page 78 and 79:
would have to be to be considered t
- Page 80 and 81:
mean of 82 subsidized units per tra
- Page 82 and 83:
Subsidized Housing by Type and Pove
- Page 84 and 85:
TABLE 4.9Subsidized Units by Subsid
- Page 86 and 87:
unemployment rate (.427), less than
- Page 88 and 89:
TABLE 4.12Correlation Matrix (page
- Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 4.12Correlation Matrix (page
- Page 92 and 93:
spatial sensitivity because many di
- Page 94 and 95:
It is possible that these census tr
- Page 96 and 97:
only 8 MSA’s). The segregation in
- Page 98 and 99:
The correlation between the subsidi
- Page 100 and 101:
developing strategies to deconcentr
- Page 102 and 103:
y subsidy type. The correlation bet
- Page 104 and 105:
with a poverty rate of 9.2 percent.
- Page 106 and 107:
The cluster is relatively small con
- Page 108 and 109:
Cluster 7: Other Site-Based Units -
- Page 110 and 111:
the only cluster that had a signifi
- Page 112 and 113:
alter the perception of public hous
- Page 114 and 115:
VouchersVoucher type tracts are dom
- Page 116 and 117:
TABLE 6.1Subsidized Units by Cluste
- Page 118 and 119:
FIGURE 6.1Percent Census Tracts by
- Page 120 and 121:
FIGURE 6.5Census Tract Percent Rent
- Page 122 and 123:
Cluster - Concentration -PovertyCen
- Page 124 and 125:
strategies. The cluster map shows t
- Page 126 and 127:
FIGURE 6.9Map of Public Housing Uni
- Page 128 and 129:
Cluster 1: Voucher/No Subsidized Un
- Page 130 and 131:
considered moderately concentrated
- Page 132 and 133:
Cluster Analysis ResultsThe cluster
- Page 134 and 135: tracts than other subsidy types it
- Page 136 and 137: ecommend efforts to reduce the leve
- Page 138 and 139: scale at which the impacts occur; 2
- Page 140 and 141: units. Given the high cost of these
- Page 142 and 143: REFERENCESAbt Associates, I. (2006)
- Page 144 and 145: Briggs, X. d. S. (Ed.). (2005). The
- Page 146 and 147: Deng, L. (2007). Comparing the effe
- Page 148 and 149: Ellen, I. G., & Voicu, I. (2005). N
- Page 150 and 151: Galster, G. C. (2005). Consequences
- Page 152 and 153: Harris, L. E. (1999). A home is mor
- Page 154 and 155: Johnson, M. P. (2006). Single-perio
- Page 156 and 157: Lee, B. A., Reardon, S. F., Firebau
- Page 158 and 159: Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does Affordab
- Page 160 and 161: implementing eight consent decrees.
- Page 162 and 163: Schwartz, A. (1999). New York City
- Page 164 and 165: Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (200
- Page 166 and 167: APPENDIX A.1Downloadable Databases
- Page 168 and 169: APPENDIX A.4Missing DataPublicHousi
- Page 170 and 171: APPENDIX A.6Subsidized Housing Unit
- Page 172 and 173: APPENDIX A.8Subsidized Housing Unit
- Page 174 and 175: APPENDIX A.9Demographics by Cluster
- Page 176 and 177: MSAFIPS MSA Name Population Voucher
- Page 178 and 179: MSAFIPS MSA Name Population Voucher
- Page 180 and 181: MSAFIPS MSA Name Population Voucher
- Page 182 and 183: MSAFIPS MSA Name Population Voucher
- Page 186 and 187: MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name Popu
- Page 188 and 189: MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name Popu
- Page 190 and 191: MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name Popu
- Page 192 and 193: MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name Popu
- Page 194 and 195: MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name Popu
- Page 196 and 197: Author Date Data GeographyGalster a
- Page 198 and 199: Author Date Data GeographyHolloway,
- Page 200 and 201: Author Date Data GeographyType ofPr
- Page 202 and 203: Author Date Data GeographyMurray 19
- Page 204 and 205: Author Date Data GeographyLee 20081
- Page 206 and 207: Author Date Data GeographyOakley 20
- Page 208 and 209: Devine, Gray,Rubin andTaghavi (HUD)
- Page 210 and 211: Carlson,Haveman,Kaplan andWolfe 200
- Page 212 and 213: Newman andSchnare 1997Rohe andFreem
- Page 214: Galster andZobel 1998Freeman andBot