The Spatial Concentration of Subsidized Housing - Poverty & Race ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name PopulationBlack-Non-BlackHispanic-Non-HispanicPoor-Non-PoorSubsidized-Non-Subsidized4200 Lawton, OK MSA 114,996 0.3059 0.1671 0.2553 0.38804240 Lewiston-Auburn, ME MSA 93,078 0.2872 0.4183 0.3261 0.44834280 Lexington, KY MSA 478,755 0.4688 0.4015 0.3170 0.48854320 Lima, OH MSA 155,084 0.6324 0.3175 0.3597 0.55454360 Lincoln, NE MSA 249,829 0.3377 0.3276 0.3978 0.54784400 Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR MSA 583,845 0.5936 0.3268 0.3142 0.56344420 Longview-Marshall, TX MSA 208,780 0.4070 0.3440 0.2072 0.47604480 Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA PMSA 9,512,635 0.5551 0.5107 0.3378 0.54174520 Louisville, KY-IN MSA 1,025,598 0.6306 0.3533 0.4000 0.61494560 Lowell, MA-NH PMSA 301,686 0.4340 0.5435 0.4469 0.69184600 Lubbock, TX MSA 242,628 0.4460 0.3879 0.2663 0.63994640 Lynchburg, VA MSA 214,911 0.3882 0.3602 0.2703 0.66804680 Macon, GA MSA 322,549 0.5107 0.3710 0.3843 0.54044720 Madison, WI MSA 426,526 0.4487 0.3500 0.5266 0.43134760 Manchester, NH PMSA 198,378 0.3994 0.4458 0.3658 0.51364800 Mansfield, OH MSA 175,818 0.6693 0.3311 0.2919 0.49544880 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX MSA 569,463 0.4679 0.3995 0.2352 0.49144890 Medford-Ashland, OR MSA 181,269 0.2768 0.2996 0.2431 0.39464900 Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Bay, FL MSA 476,230 0.4805 0.2096 0.2803 0.69374920 Memphis, TN-AR-MS MSA 1,135,614 0.6621 0.4401 0.4130 0.62064940 Merced, CA MSA 210,554 0.3179 0.2753 0.2420 0.51665000 Miami, FL PMSA 2,252,979 0.6863 0.5016 0.3004 0.59445015 Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ PMSA 1,169,641 0.4413 0.4893 0.4004 0.64565080 Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI PMSA 1,499,979 0.7963 0.5649 0.5093 0.55985120 Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI MSA 2,966,620 0.5419 0.4278 0.4168 0.56115140 Missoula, MT MSA 95,802 0.2219 0.1899 0.3513 0.44925160 Mobile, AL MSA 540,258 0.6092 0.3261 0.3391 0.62485170 Modesto, CA MSA 446,997 0.2953 0.3328 0.2689 0.41155190 Monmouth-Ocean, NJ PMSA 1,126,200 0.5968 0.3468 0.3372 0.70365200 Monroe, LA MSA 147,250 0.6894 0.3002 0.3905 0.49075240 Montgomery, AL MSA 333,055 0.5465 0.3348 0.3780 0.59235280 Muncie, IN MSA 118,769 0.5137 0.3491 0.4324 0.56895330 Myrtle Beach, SC MSA 196,629 0.4372 0.3055 0.2284 0.56295345 Naples, FL MSA 251,377 0.5429 0.4992 0.3876 0.73305350 Nashua, NH PMSA 190,572 0.3497 0.5154 0.3258 0.5455178
MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name PopulationBlack-Non-BlackHispanic-Non-HispanicPoor-Non-PoorSubsidized-Non-Subsidized5360 Nashville, TN MSA 1,231,311 0.5502 0.4394 0.3513 0.61355380 Nassau-Suffolk, NY PMSA 2,753,724 0.6818 0.4016 0.2982 0.67385400 New Bedford, MA PMSA 175,198 0.4464 0.5385 0.4049 0.56435480 New Haven-Meriden, CT PMSA 541,963 0.6188 0.5136 0.4497 0.63315520 New London-Norwich, CT-RI MSA 293,566 0.5132 0.4287 0.2995 0.63075560 New Orleans, LA MSA 1,337,669 0.6677 0.3359 0.3716 0.66465600 New York, NY PMSA 9,297,558 0.6669 0.5081 0.3640 0.65895640 Newark, NJ PMSA 2,032,989 0.7372 0.5456 0.4620 0.63305660 Newburgh, NY-PA PMSA 387,669 0.4534 0.3367 0.4222 0.63975720 Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News, VA-NC MSA 1,569,392 0.4497 0.2943 0.3699 0.61105775 Oakland, CA PMSA 2,392,557 0.5202 0.3698 0.3829 0.55385790 Ocala, FL MSA 258,916 0.4690 0.2784 0.2253 0.70325800 Odessa-Midland, TX MSA 237,132 0.4113 0.4006 0.2733 0.49795880 Oklahoma City, OK MSA 1,083,051 0.5150 0.4238 0.3460 0.56895910 Olympia, WA PMSA 207,355 0.3119 0.1904 0.2065 0.52195920 Omaha, NE-IA MSA 716,998 0.6311 0.4669 0.4052 0.57215945 Orange County, CA PMSA 2,846,289 0.2943 0.5097 0.3562 0.56385960 Orlando, FL MSA 1,644,561 0.5100 0.3572 0.2931 0.69495990 Owensboro, KY MSA 91,545 0.5185 0.3404 0.3196 0.48526015 Panama City, FL MSA 148,217 0.4710 0.1942 0.2597 0.58916020 Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH MSA 151,237 0.3895 0.4272 0.1980 0.53786080 Pensacola, FL MSA 412,153 0.4851 0.2221 0.2759 0.57126120 Peoria-Pekin, IL MSA 347,387 0.6847 0.3256 0.4100 0.58056160 Philadelphia, PA-NJ PMSA 5,097,403 0.6850 0.5407 0.4646 0.66256200 Phoenix-Mesa, AZ MSA 3,251,591 0.3402 0.4935 0.3967 0.63666240 Pine Bluff, AR MSA 84,278 0.5944 0.3337 0.3062 0.43546280 Pittsburgh, PA MSA 2,358,695 0.6666 0.3942 0.3402 0.58606320 Pittsfield, MA MSA 83,099 0.4404 0.3490 0.2440 0.52576340 Pocatello, ID MSA 75,565 0.3729 0.1655 0.2403 0.44266400 Portland, ME MSA 243,544 0.3754 0.3423 0.3069 0.55166440 Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA PMSA 1,918,009 0.4768 0.3324 0.2728 0.53206450 Portsmouth-Rochester, NH-ME PMSA 241,542 0.3086 0.2689 0.2753 0.48656480 Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA MSA 1,188,613 0.5241 0.6354 0.4061 0.51366520 Provo-Orem, UT MSA 367,969 0.3086 0.3478 0.4664 0.50716560 Pueblo, CO MSA 139,724 0.3282 0.3104 0.3283 0.4438179
Page 1 and 2:
THE SPATIAL CONCENTRATION OF SUBSID
Page 3 and 4:
I certify that I have read this dis
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF TABLES ...
Page 7 and 8:
6.4 Summary of Cluster Analysis Res
Page 9 and 10:
Table 5.2 Range of MSA Segregation
Page 11 and 12:
ABSTRACTSubsidized housing has been
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1INTRODUCTIONPublic housing
Page 15 and 16:
Data on subsidized housing prior to
Page 17 and 18:
subsidy programs in that rents are
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 2LITERATURE REVIEWA compreh
Page 21 and 22:
from the nine matched neighborhood
Page 23 and 24:
Overall, it is clear that there are
Page 25 and 26:
limited the study to city vs. subur
Page 27 and 28:
to the public housing, location adj
Page 29 and 30:
hardship; and 2) public housing wea
Page 31 and 32:
deconcentrated over time is whether
Page 33 and 34:
deconcentration. In fact, a higher
Page 35 and 36:
in the same neighborhood). On avera
Page 37 and 38:
Concentration of Tenant-Based Subsi
Page 39 and 40:
Wang, Varady and Wang (2008) studie
Page 41 and 42:
from the vouchers. However, there w
Page 43 and 44:
consisting of single family zones,
Page 45 and 46:
early-mid 1990’s consisting of pu
Page 47 and 48:
Recent studies of individual housin
Page 49 and 50:
One of the criticisms of the HOPE V
Page 51 and 52:
that they are smaller scale, better
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 3METHODOLOGYWhile the conce
Page 55 and 56:
Data AvailabilityA limitation in th
Page 57 and 58:
just coming on line in the 1990’s
Page 59 and 60:
with 1,500 to 12,000 the minimum an
Page 61 and 62:
exclusion of these units is not pro
Page 63 and 64:
Unduplication of Subsidized UnitsDu
Page 65:
projects between 35.2 and 46.6 perc
Page 68 and 69:
Resulting Data for AnalysisAs a res
Page 70 and 71:
Lack of household level data will l
Page 72 and 73:
TABLE 4.2Mean Subsidized Housing Un
Page 74 and 75:
Measures of ConcentrationThree meas
Page 76 and 77:
TABLE 4.6Subsidized Units as a Perc
Page 78 and 79:
would have to be to be considered t
Page 80 and 81:
mean of 82 subsidized units per tra
Page 82 and 83:
Subsidized Housing by Type and Pove
Page 84 and 85:
TABLE 4.9Subsidized Units by Subsid
Page 86 and 87:
unemployment rate (.427), less than
Page 88 and 89:
TABLE 4.12Correlation Matrix (page
Page 90 and 91:
TABLE 4.12Correlation Matrix (page
Page 92 and 93:
spatial sensitivity because many di
Page 94 and 95:
It is possible that these census tr
Page 96 and 97:
only 8 MSA’s). The segregation in
Page 98 and 99:
The correlation between the subsidi
Page 100 and 101:
developing strategies to deconcentr
Page 102 and 103:
y subsidy type. The correlation bet
Page 104 and 105:
with a poverty rate of 9.2 percent.
Page 106 and 107:
The cluster is relatively small con
Page 108 and 109:
Cluster 7: Other Site-Based Units -
Page 110 and 111:
the only cluster that had a signifi
Page 112 and 113:
alter the perception of public hous
Page 114 and 115:
VouchersVoucher type tracts are dom
Page 116 and 117:
TABLE 6.1Subsidized Units by Cluste
Page 118 and 119:
FIGURE 6.1Percent Census Tracts by
Page 120 and 121:
FIGURE 6.5Census Tract Percent Rent
Page 122 and 123:
Cluster - Concentration -PovertyCen
Page 124 and 125:
strategies. The cluster map shows t
Page 126 and 127:
FIGURE 6.9Map of Public Housing Uni
Page 128 and 129:
Cluster 1: Voucher/No Subsidized Un
Page 130 and 131:
considered moderately concentrated
Page 132 and 133:
Cluster Analysis ResultsThe cluster
Page 134 and 135:
tracts than other subsidy types it
Page 136 and 137:
ecommend efforts to reduce the leve
Page 138 and 139:
scale at which the impacts occur; 2
Page 140 and 141: units. Given the high cost of these
Page 142 and 143: REFERENCESAbt Associates, I. (2006)
Page 144 and 145: Briggs, X. d. S. (Ed.). (2005). The
Page 146 and 147: Deng, L. (2007). Comparing the effe
Page 148 and 149: Ellen, I. G., & Voicu, I. (2005). N
Page 150 and 151: Galster, G. C. (2005). Consequences
Page 152 and 153: Harris, L. E. (1999). A home is mor
Page 154 and 155: Johnson, M. P. (2006). Single-perio
Page 156 and 157: Lee, B. A., Reardon, S. F., Firebau
Page 158 and 159: Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does Affordab
Page 160 and 161: implementing eight consent decrees.
Page 162 and 163: Schwartz, A. (1999). New York City
Page 164 and 165: Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (200
Page 166 and 167: APPENDIX A.1Downloadable Databases
Page 168 and 169: APPENDIX A.4Missing DataPublicHousi
Page 170 and 171: APPENDIX A.6Subsidized Housing Unit
Page 172 and 173: APPENDIX A.8Subsidized Housing Unit
Page 174 and 175: APPENDIX A.9Demographics by Cluster
Page 176 and 177: MSAFIPS MSA Name Population Voucher
Page 186 and 187: MSA /PMSA Code MSA / PMSA Name Popu
Page 196 and 197: Author Date Data GeographyGalster a
Page 198 and 199: Author Date Data GeographyHolloway,
Page 200 and 201: Author Date Data GeographyType ofPr
Page 202 and 203: Author Date Data GeographyMurray 19
Page 204 and 205: Author Date Data GeographyLee 20081
Page 206 and 207: Author Date Data GeographyOakley 20
Page 208 and 209: Devine, Gray,Rubin andTaghavi (HUD)
Page 210 and 211: Carlson,Haveman,Kaplan andWolfe 200
Page 212 and 213: Newman andSchnare 1997Rohe andFreem
Page 214: Galster andZobel 1998Freeman andBot
show all

The Spatial Concentration of Subsidized Housing - Poverty & Race ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?