13.07.2015 Views

The Spatial Concentration of Subsidized Housing - Poverty & Race ...

The Spatial Concentration of Subsidized Housing - Poverty & Race ...

The Spatial Concentration of Subsidized Housing - Poverty & Race ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Concentration</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tenant-Based <strong>Subsidized</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> (Vouchers)<strong>Housing</strong> vouchers have increasingly become a significant percentage <strong>of</strong> allfederally subsidized housing units increasing from 1.35 million units to 1.50 millionunits (11 percent increase) from 1993 to 2000 at a time when public housing unitsdeclined by 22 percent. <strong>Housing</strong> vouchers were also used during this period forvarious mobility programs and HOPE VI relocations. A number <strong>of</strong> studies <strong>of</strong>vouchers were conducted to determine if vouchers were indeed effective atdeconcentrating housing and poverty. Since these studies typically track recipients <strong>of</strong>subsidized housing they are also useful in geographic concentration studies becausethey capture the geographic clustering <strong>of</strong> units. <strong>The</strong>se studies have used the mostrecent data available to study patterns <strong>of</strong> dispersion and concentration <strong>of</strong> subsidizedhousing. Results indicate greater movement to lower poverty neighborhoods but themovement was minimal given the size <strong>of</strong> the subsidized housing stock and there wasvirtually no lessening <strong>of</strong> racial and ethnic segregation.Kingsley, Johnson and Pettit (2003) studied relocation in the HOPE VIprogram in 31 MSA’s. <strong>The</strong>y found that the number <strong>of</strong> HOPE VI relocation voucherswas small enough not to impact the location pattern <strong>of</strong> the overall voucher program (p.441). Clustering was found in some cases but was not the predominant pattern.Clusters were more likely in tracts with middle to high poverty rates and high minorityconcentration (p.443). <strong>The</strong> authors conclude that “the numbers alone cannot tell uswhether the degree <strong>of</strong> clustering we have observed in a particular city is problematic or25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!