07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 Electroencephalography <strong>and</strong> Event-Related Potentials<br />

Interactions between neurons evok<strong>in</strong>g current flow across cell membranes are the essence<br />

<strong>of</strong> bra<strong>in</strong> activity. The direction <strong>and</strong> magnitude <strong>of</strong> current flow <strong>in</strong> a neuron depends<br />

on the neurons it communicates with. This activity may be recorded by an electrode that<br />

will detect rapid change <strong>in</strong> voltage (or potential) caused by rapid changes <strong>in</strong> current<br />

flow due to action potentials. Current flow can also observed <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> synapses.<br />

The summed activity <strong>of</strong> many synapses on many neighbour<strong>in</strong>g neurons (called field<br />

potential) can be recorded by a pair <strong>of</strong> electrodes – one placed directly <strong>in</strong> neural tissue<br />

<strong>and</strong> one some distance away.<br />

Electroencephalography: Neuronal activity can also be recorded non-<strong>in</strong>vasively from<br />

electrodes placed on the scalp. Such record <strong>of</strong> fluctuat<strong>in</strong>g potential across time is considered<br />

as an objective marker <strong>of</strong> neural activity that underlies cognitive processes,<br />

called EEG. Its amplitude is much smaller than <strong>in</strong>vasively recorded field potentials<br />

because the skull <strong>and</strong> the scalp are strong electrical <strong>in</strong>sulators.<br />

The EEG is ma<strong>in</strong>ly caused by synchronously occurr<strong>in</strong>g post-synaptic potentials <strong>and</strong><br />

thought to consist <strong>of</strong> sources from numerous cerebral areas with opposite electrical<br />

poles that constantly fluctuate. Its amplitude <strong>and</strong> polarity depends on the number <strong>and</strong><br />

the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the contribut<strong>in</strong>g synaptic potentials, on whether current is flow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

or out <strong>of</strong> cells (i.e., movement <strong>of</strong> positive or negative ions, excitatory or <strong>in</strong>hibitory synaptic<br />

potentials), <strong>and</strong> on the geometric relationship between the synapses <strong>and</strong> electrode<br />

(i.e., current flow toward versus away from the electrode, or both toward <strong>and</strong> away,<br />

which will lead to cancellation <strong>of</strong> the oppos<strong>in</strong>g signals; Nunez, 1981). Cortical pyramidal<br />

cells (particularly <strong>in</strong> layer IV <strong>and</strong> V <strong>of</strong> the cortex) dom<strong>in</strong>ate the EEG signal, because<br />

they are the largest <strong>and</strong> most numerous cell type, <strong>and</strong> their dendritic processes are spatially<br />

parallel to their neighbours (Elul, 1971). Such an organization leads to summation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the small electrical fields generated by each active synapse. Given the low electrical<br />

conductivity <strong>of</strong> the skull, electrical potentials recorded from the scalp must reflect the<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> large numbers <strong>of</strong> neurons, estimated 1000 to 10,000 for the smallest signals<br />

recorded.<br />

Usually, the electrodes used to measure EEG are placed at st<strong>and</strong>ardized positions at the<br />

scalp. Historically, the system <strong>of</strong> locat<strong>in</strong>g electrodes is referred to as International 10-20<br />

system (Jasper, 1958): In this system, the electrodes are placed at sites that are placed <strong>in</strong><br />

10% <strong>and</strong> 20% distances from four anatomical l<strong>and</strong>marks (nasion, <strong>in</strong>ion, <strong>and</strong> the perauricular<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> front <strong>of</strong> the ears; see Figure 7-1). The American Electroencephalographic<br />

Society (1994) added electrode placement nomenclature guidel<strong>in</strong>es that designate specific<br />

locations <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> 75 electrode positions (see Figure 7-1, right part).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!