Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 205 Sluming, V., Brooks, J., Howard, M., Downes, J. J., & Roberts, N. (2007). Broca's area supports enhanced visuospatial cognition in orchestral musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(14), 3799-3806. Snow, D., & Balog, H. L. (2002). Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research. Lingua, 112, 1025-1058. Snowling, M., Bishop, D. V. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2000). Is Preschool Language Impairment a Risk Factor for Dyslexia in Adolescence? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(05), 587-600. Sosniak, L. A. (1985). Learning to be a concert pianist. In B. S. Bloom & L. A. Sosniak (Eds.), Developing talent in young people (1st ed., pp. x, 557 p.). New York: Ballantine Books. Sparks, R. W., & Holland, A. L. (1976). Method: melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41(3), 287-297. Speer, J. R., & Meeks, P. U. (1985). School children's perception of pitch in music. Psychomusicology, 5(1-2), 49-56. Stark, R. E., & Heinz, J. M. (1996). Vowel perception in children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39(4), 860-869. Steele, K. M. (2000). Arousal and mood factors in the "Mozart effect". Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(1), 188-190. Steele, K. M., Brown, J. D., & Stoecker, J. A. (1999). Failure to confirm the Rauscher and Shaw description of recovery of the Mozart effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(3 Pt 1), 843-848. Steele, K. M., dalla Bella, S., Peretz, I., Dunlop, T., Dawe, L. A., Humphrey, G. K., et al. (1999). Prelude or requiem for the 'Mozart effect'? Nature, 400(6747), 827- 828. Stein, C. M., Schick, J. H., Gerry Taylor, H., Shriberg, L. D., Millard, C., Kundtz- Kluge, A., et al. (2004). Pleiotropic effects of a chromosome 3 locus on speechsound disorder and reading. American Journal of Human Genetics, 74(2), 283- 297. Steinbeis, N., Koelsch, S., & Sloboda, J. A. (2006). The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: evidence from subjective, physiological, and neural responses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(8), 1380-1393. Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 191-196. Stinear, C. M., & Byblow, W. D. (2004). Impaired modulation of intracortical inhibition in focal hand dystonia. Cerebral Cortex, 14(5), 555-561. Stowe, L. A., Withaar, R. G., Wijers, A. A., Broere, C. A. J., & Paans, A. M. J. (2002). Encoding and storage in working memory during sentence comprehension. In P. Merlo & S. Stevenson (Eds.), The lexical basis of sentence processing: formal, computational, and experimental issues (pp. 181-206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Streeter, L. A. (1976). Language perception of 2-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience. Nature, 259(5538), 39-41. Stromswold, K. (1998). Genetics of spoken language disorders. Human Biology, 70(2), 297-324. Stromswold, K. (2001). The Heritability of Language: A Review and Metaanalysis of Twin, Adoption, and Linkage Studies. Language, 77(4), 647-723.
References 206 Stromswold, K., Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Rauch, S. (1996). Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain and Language, 52(3), 452-473. Suchodeletz, W. v. (2004). Zur Prognose von Kindern mit umschriebenen Sprachentwicklungsstörungen. In W. v. Suchodeletz (Ed.), Welche Chancen haben Kinder mit Entwicklungsstörungen? (pp. 155-199). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Swingley, D. (2005). Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary. Cognitive Psychology, 50(1), 86-132. Szagun, G. (2001). Language acquisition in young German-speaking children with cochlear implants: individual differences and implications for conceptions of a 'sensitive phase'. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 6(5), 288-297. Tallal, P. (1999). Children with language impairment can be accurately identified using temporal processing measures: A response to Zhang and Tomblin, Brain and Language, 65, 395-403 (1998). Brain and Language, 69(2), 222-229. Tallal, P., Miller, S., & Fitch, R. H. (1993). Neurobiological basis of speech: a case for the preeminence of temporal processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 27-47. Tallal, P., & Newcombe, F. (1978). Impairment of auditory perception and language comprehension in dysphasia. Brain and Language, 5(1), 13-34. Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1973). Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature, 241(5390), 468-469. Tallal, P., & Rice, M. L. (1997). Evaluating new training programs for language impairment. ASHA [American Speech-Language-Hearing Association], 39(3), 12- 13. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 597-632. Tervaniemi, M., Just, V., Koelsch, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study. Experimental Brain Research, 161(1), 1-10. Tervaniemi, M., Rytkonen, M., Schroger, E., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Naatanen, R. (2001). Superior formation of cortical memory traces for melodic patterns in musicians. Learning and Memory, 8(5), 295-300. Tewes, U., Rossmann, P., & Schallberger, U. (2000). HAWIK-III: Hamburg-Wechsler- Intelligenztest für Kinder III [WISC-III: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III] (German ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Thayer, R. E. (1996). The origin of everyday moods : managing energy, tension, and stress. New York: Oxford University Press. Thiessen, E. D., Hill, E. A., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-Directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. Infancy, 7(1), 53-71. Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 706-716. Thomas, M. S. C., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Are developmental disorders like cases of adult brain damage? Implications from connectionist modelling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(6), 727-750. Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G. (2001). Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12(3), 248-251.
Page 1 and 2:
Sebastian Jentschke: Neural Correla
Page 3 and 4:
Gutachter der Arbeit Prof. Dr. Ange
Page 6 and 7:
Table of contents 1 Introduction 1
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTS IX 7 Electroencep
Page 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI Abbreviations
Page 13 and 14:
Zusammenfassung der wissenschaftlic
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 20 and 21:
1 Introduction Language and music a
Page 22 and 23:
2 Music Perception Music is one of
Page 24 and 25:
Music Perception 5 to her infant re
Page 26 and 27:
Music Perception 7 chronize movemen
Page 28 and 29:
Music Perception 9 at 5 years of ag
Page 30 and 31:
Music Perception 11 keys related by
Page 32 and 33:
Music Perception 13 Krumhansl and S
Page 34 and 35:
Music Perception 15 tion. The proce
Page 36 and 37:
Music Perception 17 MMN paradigms m
Page 38 and 39:
Music Perception 19 In a study, emp
Page 40 and 41:
Music Perception 21 2001a). Janata
Page 42 and 43:
3 Musical Training Performing a pie
Page 44 and 45:
Musical Training 25 Deliberate prac
Page 46 and 47:
Musical Training 27 them to transfe
Page 48 and 49:
Musical Training 29 can be found ev
Page 50 and 51:
Musical Training 31 dition (and onl
Page 52 and 53:
Musical Training 33 without substan
Page 54 and 55:
Musical Training 35 such studies sh
Page 56:
Musical Training 37 with regard to
Page 59 and 60:
Music and Language 40 Brown (2000)
Page 61 and 62:
Music and Language 42 ture (for a r
Page 63 and 64:
Music and Language 44 Neural constr
Page 65 and 66:
Music and Language 46 pitch registe
Page 67 and 68:
Music and Language 48 functions. Th
Page 69 and 70:
Music and Language 50 found from ve
Page 71 and 72:
Language Perception 52 cross-langua
Page 73 and 74:
Language Perception 54 ing that a w
Page 75 and 76:
Language Perception 56 Perceptual g
Page 77 and 78:
Language Perception 58 Social const
Page 79 and 80:
Language Perception 60 Syntax After
Page 81 and 82:
Language Perception 62 2002; Newpor
Page 83 and 84:
Language Perception 64 Complex synt
Page 85 and 86:
Language Perception 66 which these
Page 87 and 88:
Language Perception 68 interaction
Page 89 and 90:
Language Perception 70 only disrupt
Page 91 and 92:
Language Perception 72 tic structur
Page 93 and 94:
Specific Language Impairment 74 ind
Page 95 and 96:
Specific Language Impairment 76 6.2
Page 97 and 98:
Specific Language Impairment 78 6.3
Page 99 and 100:
Specific Language Impairment 80 (Be
Page 101 and 102:
Specific Language Impairment 82 ply
Page 103 and 104:
Specific Language Impairment 84 mis
Page 105 and 106:
Specific Language Impairment 86 the
Page 107 and 108:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 109 and 110:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 112:
8 Experiments I - IV: Introduction
Page 115 and 116:
Experiment I 96 parents. 13 All chi
Page 117 and 118:
Experiment I 98 patterns in short-t
Page 119 and 120:
Experiment I 100 -1.02 μV, SEM =0.
Page 121 and 122:
Experiment I 102 EAD Figure 9-3 Gra
Page 123 and 124:
Experiment I 104 amplitude size of
Page 126 and 127:
10 Experiment II: Neural correlates
Page 128 and 129:
Experiment II 109 Stimuli and parad
Page 130 and 131:
Experiment II 111 tion of objects;
Page 132 and 133:
Experiment II 113 amplitude in the
Page 134 and 135:
Experiment II 115 as compared to no
Page 136 and 137:
Experiment II 117 negative) amplitu
Page 138 and 139:
Experiment II 119 expectancy of a r
Page 140 and 141:
Experiment II 121 physical judgemen
Page 142 and 143:
11 Experiment III: Neural correlate
Page 144 and 145:
Experiment III 125 periment IV - wh
Page 146 and 147:
Experiment III 127 cational backgro
Page 148 and 149:
Experiment III 129 due to a differe
Page 150 and 151:
Experiment III 131 scalp sites. Pla
Page 152 and 153:
Experiment III 133 of syntactic reg
Page 154 and 155:
Experiment III 135 Even though desc
Page 156:
Experiment III 137 ion than in the
Page 159 and 160:
Experiment IV 140 cluded), [2] they
Page 161 and 162:
Experiment IV 142 12.3 Results Coho
Page 163 and 164:
Experiment IV 144 Figure 12-3 summa
Page 165 and 166:
Experiment IV 146 p < 0.001). In th
Page 167 and 168:
Experiment IV 148 tion cross vs. si
Page 169 and 170:
Experiment IV 150 anterior: F(1,39)
Page 171 and 172:
Experiment IV 152 An N5 usually fol
Page 174 and 175: 13 Experiment I - IV: Development o
Page 176: Development of the Neural Correlate
Page 179 and 180: General Discussion 160 and Leonard,
Page 181 and 182: General Discussion 162 sent in the
Page 183 and 184: General Discussion 164 economic sta
Page 185 and 186: General Discussion 166 Friederici,
Page 187 and 188: General Discussion 168 year old chi
Page 190 and 191: Lists of figures and tables Figure
Page 192 and 193: References Abney, S. P. (1989). A c
Page 194 and 195: References 175 Bharucha, J. J., & S
Page 196 and 197: References 177 Brattico, E., Tervan
Page 198 and 199: References 179 Creel, S. C., Newpor
Page 200 and 201: References 181 Farrell, M. M., & Ph
Page 202 and 203: References 183 Friedrich, M., & Fri
Page 204 and 205: References 185 logie. Themenbereich
Page 206 and 207: References 187 Hoff, E., & Tian, C.
Page 208 and 209: References 189 Jones, M. R. (1982).
Page 210 and 211: References 191 Koelsch, S., & Siebe
Page 212 and 213: References 193 Leonard, L. B. (2000
Page 214 and 215: References 195 McMullen, E., & Saff
Page 216 and 217: References 197 Nobre, A. C., Coull,
Page 218 and 219: References 199 Peretz, I. (1990). P
Page 220 and 221: References 201 Roederer, J. (1984).
Page 222 and 223: References 203 Schöler, H. (2004).
Page 226 and 227: References 207 Thompson, W. F., Sch
Page 228 and 229: References 209 Trehub, S. E. (2003c
Page 230: References 211 Weinert, S. (1991).
Page 233 and 234: Appendix A-2 014 incorrect Das Nilp
Page 235 and 236: Appendix A-4 044 correct Der Rasen
Page 237 and 238: Appendix A-6 073 incorrect Die Medi
Page 240 and 241: Curriculum vitae Sebastian Jentschk
Page 242: Selbstständigkeitserklärung Hierm
Page 246 and 247: MPI Series in Human Cognitive and B
Page 248 and 249: 32 André J. Szameitat Die Funktion
Page 250 and 251: 63 Ann Pannekamp Prosodische Inform
Page 252: 96 Marcel Braß Das inferior fronta
show all

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?