07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Music</strong> <strong>and</strong> Language 43<br />

described <strong>in</strong> the section on relational process<strong>in</strong>g (e.g., group<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to Gestalt<br />

laws). The <strong>in</strong>fant’s learn<strong>in</strong>g is constra<strong>in</strong>ed by its perceptual abilities. The comparability<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mechanisms, <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the acquisition <strong>of</strong> music <strong>and</strong> language suggests that at<br />

least some aspects <strong>of</strong> music <strong>and</strong> language are acquired via the same learn<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms.<br />

Presumably, these mechanisms are utilized to avoid “bloom<strong>in</strong>g buzz<strong>in</strong>g confusion”<br />

(W. James, 1890) by virtue <strong>of</strong> a perceptual system that weights some cues more<br />

than others <strong>and</strong> a learn<strong>in</strong>g system flexibly adaptable to the actual task. Categorical perception<br />

is an example for such a perceptual constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fants employ categorical<br />

perception for speech <strong>and</strong> non-speech sounds. For example, <strong>in</strong> language categorical<br />

perception is applied to phonemes, whereas <strong>in</strong> music tones or chords may be categorized<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to their frequency spectrum.<br />

Computational constra<strong>in</strong>ts like pattern detection or satistical learn<strong>in</strong>g may be <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> the segmentation <strong>of</strong> musical phrases <strong>and</strong> the abstraction <strong>of</strong> the regularities that enable<br />

the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> musical structure. Categorical knowledge may enable children to track<br />

consistent patterns <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>put <strong>and</strong> to detect the probabilities <strong>of</strong> particular tones to cooccur<br />

to locate the boundaries between both, words <strong>and</strong> tones (Saffran et al., 1999).<br />

Infant learners can detect structure employ<strong>in</strong>g either rule-based or statistical learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(cf. Perruchet & Pacton, 2006). While rule-based learn<strong>in</strong>g relies on chunk<strong>in</strong>g, statistical<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g relies on frequency distributions. Both pr<strong>in</strong>ciples abstract from the particular<br />

elements <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>put to recognize “grammatical” sequences <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>volve the detection <strong>of</strong><br />

sound patterns that cue underly<strong>in</strong>g structure. These mechanisms might not be dedicated<br />

solely to language learn<strong>in</strong>g but might also be used for learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> other doma<strong>in</strong>s. For<br />

example, <strong>in</strong>fants may use such mechanisms to acquire knowledge about musical scale<br />

structure <strong>and</strong> Western tonal conventions (exploit<strong>in</strong>g their distributional properties, see<br />

Krumhansl, 1990; Tillmann et al., 2000).<br />

Suprasegmental cues (which are similar for music <strong>and</strong> language) are probabilistically<br />

related with structural boundaries <strong>and</strong>, thus, are assumed to play a role <strong>in</strong> del<strong>in</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

structural <strong>in</strong>formation: Infants are shown to listen longer to music when pauses are<br />

placed on appropriate rather than r<strong>and</strong>om positions (Jusczyk & Krumhansl, 1993;<br />

Krumhansl & Jusczyk, 1990). These prosodic cues are highly salient to <strong>in</strong>fants <strong>and</strong><br />

drive much <strong>of</strong> the early process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> both doma<strong>in</strong>s. This might rely on their earliest<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g experiences – the filter<strong>in</strong>g properties <strong>of</strong> the uterus leave rhythmic cues <strong>in</strong>tact<br />

relative to high frequency <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

Social constra<strong>in</strong>ts may channel what <strong>in</strong>formation will be focused when <strong>in</strong>fants were<br />

familiarized with music <strong>of</strong> their culture <strong>and</strong> with language. The emphasis, <strong>in</strong>troduced by<br />

specific musical properties <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fant-directed s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> speech may help to focus the<br />

attention on these properties.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!