07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Experiment II 121<br />

physical judgements. In contrast, children with SLI may primarily rely on the acoustical<br />

process <strong>and</strong> have deficiencies <strong>in</strong> the cognitive process (which is <strong>in</strong>dicated by their lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> an ERAN <strong>and</strong> an N5). The ability to detect <strong>in</strong>variant aspects <strong>of</strong> the structural relations<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the elements <strong>of</strong> the sequences (e.g., chords or tones) might be deficient <strong>in</strong> SLI<br />

children. This ability is essential for the acquisition <strong>of</strong> implicit knowledge <strong>of</strong> musical<br />

syntax. This knowledge provides the basis for the cognitive operations <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> syntax<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g. Moreover, these processes appear <strong>in</strong> direct succession <strong>and</strong> their onset is<br />

overlapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> time: the acoustic process around 100 to 200 ms, the cognitive process<br />

(reflected by the ERAN) around 230 to 350 ms. As the observed ERP components have<br />

a different polarity, the onset <strong>of</strong> the ERAN may reduce the amplitude size <strong>of</strong> the early<br />

acoustic difference.<br />

Somewhat contrast<strong>in</strong>g with the assumption that children with SLI may merely rely on<br />

the acoustical process is the lack <strong>of</strong> a difference between children with SLI <strong>and</strong> children<br />

with TLD <strong>in</strong> their ERP responses to the first chord <strong>of</strong> the sequence: For the <strong>in</strong>itial 200<br />

ms <strong>of</strong> the first chord no difference between the two groups was found (neither a ma<strong>in</strong><br />

effect nor any <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teractions with subgroup were significant). It should be emphasized<br />

that the lack <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a different ERP response to the onset <strong>of</strong> the chord sequence<br />

<strong>and</strong> the above made assumptions differ with regard to the processes that underlie<br />

them: At the onset <strong>of</strong> the chord sequence there is no memory representation <strong>of</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g<br />

chords <strong>in</strong> echoic memory (because the preced<strong>in</strong>g sequence was f<strong>in</strong>ished <strong>and</strong> followed<br />

by a silent <strong>in</strong>terval) whereas the acoustic process mentioned above builds upon<br />

these echoic memory representations.<br />

However, even though the above made reason<strong>in</strong>g is consistent, it rema<strong>in</strong>s speculative.<br />

Thus, this early effect should be replicated <strong>and</strong> confirmed, <strong>and</strong> its functional significance<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s to be specified <strong>in</strong> further studies. Unfortunately, no correlations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

amplitude <strong>of</strong> the early acoustic difference with other behavioural measures were found.<br />

Such correlation would have allowed gett<strong>in</strong>g an idea <strong>of</strong> what cognitive processes are<br />

related to this early acoustic difference.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this experiment can be summarized focuss<strong>in</strong>g on underly<strong>in</strong>g memory<br />

processes <strong>and</strong> the commonalities <strong>of</strong> language <strong>and</strong> music. These accounts do not exclude<br />

each other. Firstly, the memory deficiencies contribut<strong>in</strong>g to the differences between<br />

children with TLD <strong>and</strong> with SLI might be related to a deficit <strong>of</strong> the procedural memory<br />

system <strong>in</strong> children with SLI (Ullman & Pierpont, 2005). Further, some <strong>of</strong> the correlations<br />

with the ERAN amplitude emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g memory functions<br />

for music-syntactic process<strong>in</strong>g: A prerequisite to comprehend a musical or a sentential<br />

phrase is to hold the elements <strong>of</strong> this phrase <strong>in</strong> memory <strong>and</strong> to build relations<br />

between these elements <strong>in</strong> order to detect the underly<strong>in</strong>g structure, to group these ele-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!