Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 189 Jones, M. R. (1982). Music as a stimulus for psychological motion. Part II. An expectancy model. Psychomusicology, 2(1), 1-13. Jones, M. R. (1987). Dynamic pattern structure in music: recent theory and research. Perception and Psychophysics, 41(6), 621-634. Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96(3), 459-491. Jones, M. R., Boltz, M., & Kidd, G. (1982). Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context. Perception and Psychophysics, 32(3), 211-218. Jungblut, M., & Aldridge, D. (2004). Musik als Brücke zur Sprache - die musiktherapeutische Behandlungsmethode SIPARI bei Langzeitaphasikern. Neurologie & Rehabilitation, 10(2), 69-78. Jusczyk, P. W. (1977). Perception of syllable-final stop consonants by 2-month-old infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 21(5), 450–454. Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29(1), 1-23. Jusczyk, P. W., & Krumhansl, C. L. (1993). Pitch and rhythmic patterns affecting infants' sensitivity to musical phrase structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(3), 627-640. Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants' Sensitivity to Phonotactic Patterns in the Native Language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), 630-645. Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 770-814. Juslin, P. N., & Sloboda, J. A. (2001). Music and emotion: theory and research. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1996). Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274(5284), 114-116. Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(2), 159- 201. Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(8), 350-356. Kaas, J. H. (1991). Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 14, 137-167. Kail, R. (1994). A method for studying the generalized slowing hypothesis in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(2), 418-421. Kamenetsky, S. B., Hill, D. S., & Trehub, S. E. (1997). Effect of Tempo and Dynamics on the Perception of Emotion in Music. Psychology of Music, 25(2), 149-160. Kang, A. M., Constable, R. T., Gore, J. C., & Avrutin, S. (1999). An event-related fMRI study of implicit phrase-level syntactic and semantic processing. Neuroimage, 10(5), 555-561. Karma, K. (1979). Musical, spatial and verbal abilities. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 59, 50–53. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
References 190 Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L., & Melchers, P. (1994). K-ABC: Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (German ed.). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. Kilgour, A. R., Jakobson, L. S., & Cuddy, L. L. (2000). Music training and rate of presentation as mediators of text and song recall. Memory and Cognition, 28(5), 700- 710. Knightly, L. M., Jun, S. A., Oh, J. S., & Au, T. K. (2003). Production benefits of childhood overhearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(1), 465- 474. Knösche, T. R., Neuhaus, C., Haueisen, J., Alter, K., Maess, B., Witte, O. W., et al. (2005). Perception of phrase structure in music. Human Brain Mapping, 24(4), 259-273. Koelsch, S. (2005). Neural substrates of processing syntax and semantics in music. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 207-212. Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., Schulze, K., Alsop, D., & Schlaug, G. (2005). Adults and children processing music: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 25(4), 1068-1076. Koelsch, S., Grossmann, T., Gunter, T. C., Hahne, A., Schröger, E., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Children processing music: electric brain responses reveal musical competence and gender differences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(5), 683- 693. Koelsch, S., Gunter, T., Friederici, A. D., & Schröger, E. (2000). Brain indices of music processing: "nonmusicians" are musical. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(3), 520-541. Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., Schröger, E., Tervaniemi, M., Sammler, D., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Differentiating ERAN and MMN: an ERP study. Neuroreport, 12(7), 1385-1389. Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., von Cramon, D. Y., Zysset, S., Lohmann, G., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Bach speaks: a cortical "language-network" serves the processing of music. Neuroimage, 17(2), 956-966. Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., Wittfoth, M., & Sammler, D. (2005). Interaction between syntax processing in language and in music: an ERP Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1565-1577. Koelsch, S., Jentschke, S., & Sammler, D. Short-term effects of processing musical syntax: An ERP study. Brain Research, in press. Koelsch, S., Jentschke, S., Sammler, D., & Mietchen, D. (2007). Untangling syntactic and sensory processing: An ERP study of music perception. Psychophysiology, 44(3), 476-490. Koelsch, S., Kasper, E., Sammler, D., Schulze, K., Gunter, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 302-307. Koelsch, S., & Mulder, J. (2002). Electric brain responses to inappropriate harmonies during listening to expressive music. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(6), 862-869. Koelsch, S., Schmidt, B. H., & Kansok, J. (2002). Effects of musical expertise on the early right anterior negativity: an event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 39(5), 657-663. Koelsch, S., Schröger, E., & Gunter, T. C. (2002). Music matters: preattentive musicality of the human brain. Psychophysiology, 39(1), 38-48. Koelsch, S., Schröger, E., & Tervaniemi, M. (1999). Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians. Neuroreport, 10(6), 1309-1313.
Page 1 and 2:
Sebastian Jentschke: Neural Correla
Page 3 and 4:
Gutachter der Arbeit Prof. Dr. Ange
Page 6 and 7:
Table of contents 1 Introduction 1
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTS IX 7 Electroencep
Page 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI Abbreviations
Page 13 and 14:
Zusammenfassung der wissenschaftlic
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 20 and 21:
1 Introduction Language and music a
Page 22 and 23:
2 Music Perception Music is one of
Page 24 and 25:
Music Perception 5 to her infant re
Page 26 and 27:
Music Perception 7 chronize movemen
Page 28 and 29:
Music Perception 9 at 5 years of ag
Page 30 and 31:
Music Perception 11 keys related by
Page 32 and 33:
Music Perception 13 Krumhansl and S
Page 34 and 35:
Music Perception 15 tion. The proce
Page 36 and 37:
Music Perception 17 MMN paradigms m
Page 38 and 39:
Music Perception 19 In a study, emp
Page 40 and 41:
Music Perception 21 2001a). Janata
Page 42 and 43:
3 Musical Training Performing a pie
Page 44 and 45:
Musical Training 25 Deliberate prac
Page 46 and 47:
Musical Training 27 them to transfe
Page 48 and 49:
Musical Training 29 can be found ev
Page 50 and 51:
Musical Training 31 dition (and onl
Page 52 and 53:
Musical Training 33 without substan
Page 54 and 55:
Musical Training 35 such studies sh
Page 56:
Musical Training 37 with regard to
Page 59 and 60:
Music and Language 40 Brown (2000)
Page 61 and 62:
Music and Language 42 ture (for a r
Page 63 and 64:
Music and Language 44 Neural constr
Page 65 and 66:
Music and Language 46 pitch registe
Page 67 and 68:
Music and Language 48 functions. Th
Page 69 and 70:
Music and Language 50 found from ve
Page 71 and 72:
Language Perception 52 cross-langua
Page 73 and 74:
Language Perception 54 ing that a w
Page 75 and 76:
Language Perception 56 Perceptual g
Page 77 and 78:
Language Perception 58 Social const
Page 79 and 80:
Language Perception 60 Syntax After
Page 81 and 82:
Language Perception 62 2002; Newpor
Page 83 and 84:
Language Perception 64 Complex synt
Page 85 and 86:
Language Perception 66 which these
Page 87 and 88:
Language Perception 68 interaction
Page 89 and 90:
Language Perception 70 only disrupt
Page 91 and 92:
Language Perception 72 tic structur
Page 93 and 94:
Specific Language Impairment 74 ind
Page 95 and 96:
Specific Language Impairment 76 6.2
Page 97 and 98:
Specific Language Impairment 78 6.3
Page 99 and 100:
Specific Language Impairment 80 (Be
Page 101 and 102:
Specific Language Impairment 82 ply
Page 103 and 104:
Specific Language Impairment 84 mis
Page 105 and 106:
Specific Language Impairment 86 the
Page 107 and 108:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 109 and 110:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 112:
8 Experiments I - IV: Introduction
Page 115 and 116:
Experiment I 96 parents. 13 All chi
Page 117 and 118:
Experiment I 98 patterns in short-t
Page 119 and 120:
Experiment I 100 -1.02 μV, SEM =0.
Page 121 and 122:
Experiment I 102 EAD Figure 9-3 Gra
Page 123 and 124:
Experiment I 104 amplitude size of
Page 126 and 127:
10 Experiment II: Neural correlates
Page 128 and 129:
Experiment II 109 Stimuli and parad
Page 130 and 131:
Experiment II 111 tion of objects;
Page 132 and 133:
Experiment II 113 amplitude in the
Page 134 and 135:
Experiment II 115 as compared to no
Page 136 and 137:
Experiment II 117 negative) amplitu
Page 138 and 139:
Experiment II 119 expectancy of a r
Page 140 and 141:
Experiment II 121 physical judgemen
Page 142 and 143:
11 Experiment III: Neural correlate
Page 144 and 145:
Experiment III 125 periment IV - wh
Page 146 and 147:
Experiment III 127 cational backgro
Page 148 and 149:
Experiment III 129 due to a differe
Page 150 and 151:
Experiment III 131 scalp sites. Pla
Page 152 and 153:
Experiment III 133 of syntactic reg
Page 154 and 155:
Experiment III 135 Even though desc
Page 156:
Experiment III 137 ion than in the
Page 159 and 160: Experiment IV 140 cluded), [2] they
Page 161 and 162: Experiment IV 142 12.3 Results Coho
Page 163 and 164: Experiment IV 144 Figure 12-3 summa
Page 165 and 166: Experiment IV 146 p < 0.001). In th
Page 167 and 168: Experiment IV 148 tion cross vs. si
Page 169 and 170: Experiment IV 150 anterior: F(1,39)
Page 171 and 172: Experiment IV 152 An N5 usually fol
Page 174 and 175: 13 Experiment I - IV: Development o
Page 176: Development of the Neural Correlate
Page 179 and 180: General Discussion 160 and Leonard,
Page 181 and 182: General Discussion 162 sent in the
Page 183 and 184: General Discussion 164 economic sta
Page 185 and 186: General Discussion 166 Friederici,
Page 187 and 188: General Discussion 168 year old chi
Page 190 and 191: Lists of figures and tables Figure
Page 192 and 193: References Abney, S. P. (1989). A c
Page 194 and 195: References 175 Bharucha, J. J., & S
Page 196 and 197: References 177 Brattico, E., Tervan
Page 198 and 199: References 179 Creel, S. C., Newpor
Page 200 and 201: References 181 Farrell, M. M., & Ph
Page 202 and 203: References 183 Friedrich, M., & Fri
Page 204 and 205: References 185 logie. Themenbereich
Page 206 and 207: References 187 Hoff, E., & Tian, C.
Page 210 and 211: References 191 Koelsch, S., & Siebe
Page 212 and 213: References 193 Leonard, L. B. (2000
Page 214 and 215: References 195 McMullen, E., & Saff
Page 216 and 217: References 197 Nobre, A. C., Coull,
Page 218 and 219: References 199 Peretz, I. (1990). P
Page 220 and 221: References 201 Roederer, J. (1984).
Page 222 and 223: References 203 Schöler, H. (2004).
Page 224 and 225: References 205 Sluming, V., Brooks,
Page 226 and 227: References 207 Thompson, W. F., Sch
Page 228 and 229: References 209 Trehub, S. E. (2003c
Page 230: References 211 Weinert, S. (1991).
Page 233 and 234: Appendix A-2 014 incorrect Das Nilp
Page 235 and 236: Appendix A-4 044 correct Der Rasen
Page 237 and 238: Appendix A-6 073 incorrect Die Medi
Page 240 and 241: Curriculum vitae Sebastian Jentschk
Page 242: Selbstständigkeitserklärung Hierm
Page 246 and 247: MPI Series in Human Cognitive and B
Page 248 and 249: 32 André J. Szameitat Die Funktion
Page 250 and 251: 63 Ann Pannekamp Prosodische Inform
Page 252: 96 Marcel Braß Das inferior fronta
show all

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?