Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 185 logie. Themenbereich C: Theorie und Forschung. Serie III], pp. 603-640). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Grimm, H. (2003). Störungen der Sprachentwicklung: Grundlagen - Ursachen - Diagnose - Intervention - Prävention (2nd ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Grimm, H., Aktas, M., & Frevert, S. (2000). SETK-2: Sprachentwicklungstest für zweijährige Kinder [Language development test for two year old children; german version]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Grimm, H., Aktas, M., & Frevert, S. (2001). SETK 3-5: Sprachentwicklungstest für drei- bis fünfjährige Kinder [Language development test for three to five year old children; german version]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Grimm, H., & Schöler, H. (1978). HSET: Heidelberger Sprachentwicklungstest [Heidelberg Language Development Test; German Version] (1st ed.). Braunschweig: Westermann. Gruson, L. M. (1988). Rehearsal skill and musical competence: Does music make perfect. In J. A. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes in music: the psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. xiii, 298 p.). Oxford [England]: Clarendon Press. Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 556-568. Hagen, E. H., & Bryant, G. A. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Human Nature, 14(1), 21-51. Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 416-423. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38(11), 1531-1549. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The Syntactic Positive Shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439-483. Hahne, A., Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Brain signatures of syntactic and semantic processes during children's language development. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1302-1318. Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis. Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194-205. Halliday, A. M. (Ed.). (1993). Evoked potentials in clinical testing. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. Halpern, A. R., & Bower, G. H. (1982). Musical Expertise and Melodic Structure in Memory for Musical Notation. The American Journal of Psychology, 95(1), 31- 50. Hamzei, F., Rijntjes, M., Dettmers, C., Glauche, V., Weiller, C., & Buchel, C. (2003). The human action recognition system and its relationship to Broca's area: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 19(3), 637-644. Hannon, E. E., & Johnson, S. P. (2005). Infants use meter to categorize rhythms and melodies: Implications for musical structure learning. Cognitive Psychology, 50(4), 354-377.
References 186 Hannon, E. E., & Trehub, S. E. (2005). Tuning in to musical rhythms: infants learn more readily than adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(35), 12639-12643. Hanshumaker, J. (1980). The effects of arts education on intellectual and social development: a review of selected research. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 61(1), 10-28. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company, Inc. Hassler, M., Birbaumer, N., & Feil, A. (1985). Musical Talent and Visual-Spatial Abilities: A Longitudinal Study. Psychology of Music, 13(2), 99-113. Haueisen, J., & Knösche, T. R. (2001). Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(6), 786-792. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569-1579. Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., Bishop, D. V. M., & Plunkett, K. (2004). Simulating SLI: General Cognitive Processing Stressors Can Produce a Specific Linguistic Profile. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1347-1362. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley. Helmbold, N., Rammsayer, T. H., & Altenmüller, E. (2005). Differences in Primary Mental Abilities Between Musicians and Nonmusicians. Journal of Individual Differences, 26(2), 74-85. Hetland, L. (2000). Learning to Make Music Enhances Spatial Reasoning. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 179-238. Hevner, K. (1936). Experimental Studies of the Elements of Expression in Music. The American Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 246-268. Hickmott, P. W., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Local circuit properties underlying cortical reorganization. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88(3), 1288-1301. Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2000). Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 131-138. Hillyard, S. A., Teder-Salejarvi, W. A., & Munte, T. F. (1998). Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8(2), 202-210. Hindemith, P. (1940). Unterweisung im Tonsatz (Vol. 1. Theoretischer Teil). Mainz: Schott. Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., Casado, P., Munoz, F., & Pozo, M. A. (2005). Syntactic expectancy: an event-related potentials study. Neuroscience Letters, 378(1), 34- 39. Hirata, Y., Schulz, M., Altenmüller, E., Elbert, T., & Pantev, C. (2004). Sensory mapping of lip representation in brass musicians with embouchure dystonia. Neuroreport, 15(5), 815-818. Ho, Y. C., Cheung, M. C., & Chan, A. S. (2003). Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations in children. Neuropsychology, 17(3), 439-450. Hoff, E., Laursen, B., & Tardif, T. (2002). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (2nd ed., pp. 231-252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. (2002). How Children Use Input to Acquire a Lexicon. Child Development, 73(2), 418-433.
Page 1 and 2:
Sebastian Jentschke: Neural Correla
Page 3 and 4:
Gutachter der Arbeit Prof. Dr. Ange
Page 6 and 7:
Table of contents 1 Introduction 1
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTS IX 7 Electroencep
Page 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI Abbreviations
Page 13 and 14:
Zusammenfassung der wissenschaftlic
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 20 and 21:
1 Introduction Language and music a
Page 22 and 23:
2 Music Perception Music is one of
Page 24 and 25:
Music Perception 5 to her infant re
Page 26 and 27:
Music Perception 7 chronize movemen
Page 28 and 29:
Music Perception 9 at 5 years of ag
Page 30 and 31:
Music Perception 11 keys related by
Page 32 and 33:
Music Perception 13 Krumhansl and S
Page 34 and 35:
Music Perception 15 tion. The proce
Page 36 and 37:
Music Perception 17 MMN paradigms m
Page 38 and 39:
Music Perception 19 In a study, emp
Page 40 and 41:
Music Perception 21 2001a). Janata
Page 42 and 43:
3 Musical Training Performing a pie
Page 44 and 45:
Musical Training 25 Deliberate prac
Page 46 and 47:
Musical Training 27 them to transfe
Page 48 and 49:
Musical Training 29 can be found ev
Page 50 and 51:
Musical Training 31 dition (and onl
Page 52 and 53:
Musical Training 33 without substan
Page 54 and 55:
Musical Training 35 such studies sh
Page 56:
Musical Training 37 with regard to
Page 59 and 60:
Music and Language 40 Brown (2000)
Page 61 and 62:
Music and Language 42 ture (for a r
Page 63 and 64:
Music and Language 44 Neural constr
Page 65 and 66:
Music and Language 46 pitch registe
Page 67 and 68:
Music and Language 48 functions. Th
Page 69 and 70:
Music and Language 50 found from ve
Page 71 and 72:
Language Perception 52 cross-langua
Page 73 and 74:
Language Perception 54 ing that a w
Page 75 and 76:
Language Perception 56 Perceptual g
Page 77 and 78:
Language Perception 58 Social const
Page 79 and 80:
Language Perception 60 Syntax After
Page 81 and 82:
Language Perception 62 2002; Newpor
Page 83 and 84:
Language Perception 64 Complex synt
Page 85 and 86:
Language Perception 66 which these
Page 87 and 88:
Language Perception 68 interaction
Page 89 and 90:
Language Perception 70 only disrupt
Page 91 and 92:
Language Perception 72 tic structur
Page 93 and 94:
Specific Language Impairment 74 ind
Page 95 and 96:
Specific Language Impairment 76 6.2
Page 97 and 98:
Specific Language Impairment 78 6.3
Page 99 and 100:
Specific Language Impairment 80 (Be
Page 101 and 102:
Specific Language Impairment 82 ply
Page 103 and 104:
Specific Language Impairment 84 mis
Page 105 and 106:
Specific Language Impairment 86 the
Page 107 and 108:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 109 and 110:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 112:
8 Experiments I - IV: Introduction
Page 115 and 116:
Experiment I 96 parents. 13 All chi
Page 117 and 118:
Experiment I 98 patterns in short-t
Page 119 and 120:
Experiment I 100 -1.02 μV, SEM =0.
Page 121 and 122:
Experiment I 102 EAD Figure 9-3 Gra
Page 123 and 124:
Experiment I 104 amplitude size of
Page 126 and 127:
10 Experiment II: Neural correlates
Page 128 and 129:
Experiment II 109 Stimuli and parad
Page 130 and 131:
Experiment II 111 tion of objects;
Page 132 and 133:
Experiment II 113 amplitude in the
Page 134 and 135:
Experiment II 115 as compared to no
Page 136 and 137:
Experiment II 117 negative) amplitu
Page 138 and 139:
Experiment II 119 expectancy of a r
Page 140 and 141:
Experiment II 121 physical judgemen
Page 142 and 143:
11 Experiment III: Neural correlate
Page 144 and 145:
Experiment III 125 periment IV - wh
Page 146 and 147:
Experiment III 127 cational backgro
Page 148 and 149:
Experiment III 129 due to a differe
Page 150 and 151:
Experiment III 131 scalp sites. Pla
Page 152 and 153:
Experiment III 133 of syntactic reg
Page 154 and 155: Experiment III 135 Even though desc
Page 156: Experiment III 137 ion than in the
Page 159 and 160: Experiment IV 140 cluded), [2] they
Page 161 and 162: Experiment IV 142 12.3 Results Coho
Page 163 and 164: Experiment IV 144 Figure 12-3 summa
Page 165 and 166: Experiment IV 146 p < 0.001). In th
Page 167 and 168: Experiment IV 148 tion cross vs. si
Page 169 and 170: Experiment IV 150 anterior: F(1,39)
Page 171 and 172: Experiment IV 152 An N5 usually fol
Page 174 and 175: 13 Experiment I - IV: Development o
Page 176: Development of the Neural Correlate
Page 179 and 180: General Discussion 160 and Leonard,
Page 181 and 182: General Discussion 162 sent in the
Page 183 and 184: General Discussion 164 economic sta
Page 185 and 186: General Discussion 166 Friederici,
Page 187 and 188: General Discussion 168 year old chi
Page 190 and 191: Lists of figures and tables Figure
Page 192 and 193: References Abney, S. P. (1989). A c
Page 194 and 195: References 175 Bharucha, J. J., & S
Page 196 and 197: References 177 Brattico, E., Tervan
Page 198 and 199: References 179 Creel, S. C., Newpor
Page 200 and 201: References 181 Farrell, M. M., & Ph
Page 202 and 203: References 183 Friedrich, M., & Fri
Page 206 and 207: References 187 Hoff, E., & Tian, C.
Page 208 and 209: References 189 Jones, M. R. (1982).
Page 210 and 211: References 191 Koelsch, S., & Siebe
Page 212 and 213: References 193 Leonard, L. B. (2000
Page 214 and 215: References 195 McMullen, E., & Saff
Page 216 and 217: References 197 Nobre, A. C., Coull,
Page 218 and 219: References 199 Peretz, I. (1990). P
Page 220 and 221: References 201 Roederer, J. (1984).
Page 222 and 223: References 203 Schöler, H. (2004).
Page 224 and 225: References 205 Sluming, V., Brooks,
Page 226 and 227: References 207 Thompson, W. F., Sch
Page 228 and 229: References 209 Trehub, S. E. (2003c
Page 230: References 211 Weinert, S. (1991).
Page 233 and 234: Appendix A-2 014 incorrect Das Nilp
Page 235 and 236: Appendix A-4 044 correct Der Rasen
Page 237 and 238: Appendix A-6 073 incorrect Die Medi
Page 240 and 241: Curriculum vitae Sebastian Jentschk
Page 242: Selbstständigkeitserklärung Hierm
Page 246 and 247: MPI Series in Human Cognitive and B
Page 248 and 249: 32 André J. Szameitat Die Funktion
Page 250 and 251: 63 Ann Pannekamp Prosodische Inform
Page 252: 96 Marcel Braß Das inferior fronta
show all

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?