07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Music</strong> <strong>and</strong> Language 44<br />

<strong>Neural</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>ts help to channel <strong>in</strong>formation to be acquired by <strong>in</strong>formation which<br />

was learned before. That is, as soon as regularities <strong>of</strong> the music <strong>of</strong> the own culture are<br />

acquired, abilities to perceive the music <strong>of</strong> another cultures may disappear. Such processes<br />

may apply to the acquisition <strong>of</strong> musical scales, tonality, <strong>and</strong> harmony. That is,<br />

<strong>in</strong>fants perceive <strong>and</strong> remember music which is structured <strong>in</strong> accordance to the rules <strong>of</strong><br />

their musical system as their experience with that music <strong>in</strong>creases (Schellenberg &<br />

Trehub, 1999; Trehub, 2000; Trehub et al., 1987). Vice versa, they simultaneously loose<br />

the ability to perceive the music <strong>of</strong> any culture (Lynch et al., 1991; Trehub et al., 1999).<br />

Comparably, <strong>in</strong> language they lose their ability to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate phonemes <strong>of</strong> any language<br />

(Cheour et al., 1998).<br />

4.3 Similarities <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g music <strong>and</strong> language<br />

Whereas some researchers favour a modular view <strong>of</strong> music process<strong>in</strong>g with musicspecific<br />

neuronal networks (Peretz & Coltheart, 2003; Peretz & Zatorre, 2005), an alternative<br />

view po<strong>in</strong>ts to significant overlap between neuronal structures utilized <strong>in</strong> language<br />

<strong>and</strong> music process<strong>in</strong>g (Koelsch, 2005; Patel, 2003). This view is strengthened by<br />

studies like Koelsch et al. (2002) demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g that important language areas are <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g music.<br />

However, while speech is highly dependent on rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g broadb<strong>and</strong> sounds,<br />

small <strong>and</strong> precise changes <strong>in</strong> frequency have to be differentiated <strong>in</strong> order to process<br />

tonal patterns <strong>in</strong> music: Whereas temporal differences as small as 20 ms are needed to<br />

process rapidly chang<strong>in</strong>g energy peaks characteristic <strong>of</strong> many speech consonants <strong>in</strong><br />

language (Tallal, Miller, & Fitch, 1993), melodies with note durations shorter than<br />

about 160 ms are difficult to identify (R. M. Warren, Gardner, Brubaker, & Bashford,<br />

1991). S<strong>in</strong>ce there is a trade-<strong>of</strong> between spectral <strong>and</strong> temporal resolution there is some<br />

functional specialization <strong>of</strong> the primary auditory cortex (cf. Liegeois-Chauvel, Giraud,<br />

Badier, Marquis, & Chauvel, 2001; Poeppel, 2003; Zatorre, 2001; Zatorre & Bel<strong>in</strong>,<br />

2001; Zatorre, Bel<strong>in</strong>, & Penhune, 2002): Left auditory areas preferentially extract <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

from short (20 to 50 ms) <strong>in</strong>tegration w<strong>in</strong>dows <strong>and</strong> are, therefore, superior <strong>in</strong><br />

temporal process<strong>in</strong>g. In contrast, their right homologues are preferentially <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

spectral process<strong>in</strong>g (pitch, prosody) with longer (150 to 250 ms) <strong>in</strong>tegration w<strong>in</strong>dows.<br />

Language prosody <strong>and</strong> music<br />

In accordance with these ideas, Friederici <strong>and</strong> Alter (2004) hypothesized a rough dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

<strong>of</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g segmental vs. suprasegmental speech <strong>in</strong>formation related to the<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction between the two hemispheres: While segmental, lexical <strong>and</strong> syntactic <strong>in</strong>for-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!