Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Specific Language Impairment 76<br />
6.2 Delayed <strong>and</strong> impaired language development<br />
Children with language impairment <strong>of</strong>ten were “late talkers”. These produce their first<br />
words relatively late <strong>and</strong> have a vocabulary <strong>of</strong> less than 50 different words at the age <strong>of</strong><br />
24 months. In contrast, children with TLD usually acquire these 50 words much earlier<br />
(around 18 to 19 months) <strong>and</strong> have a vocabulary <strong>of</strong> around 300 words at 24 months. It<br />
enables them to produce their first two-words-sentences (cf. Leonard, 1998). 12-20<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> all children did not reach the 50-words-threshold at 24 months. Around half<br />
<strong>of</strong> these children are “late bloomers”. They return to normal levels <strong>of</strong> language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency<br />
by the end <strong>of</strong> the third year <strong>of</strong> life. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g half <strong>of</strong> the children shows a<br />
delayed language development <strong>and</strong> is mostly diagnosed as hav<strong>in</strong>g specific language<br />
impairment. Approach<strong>in</strong>g the 50-words-threshold leads to a differentiation <strong>of</strong> the vocabulary<br />
<strong>and</strong> the acquisition <strong>of</strong> syntactic regularities (see chapter “Language perception”).<br />
Thus, the delay children have <strong>in</strong> their language development may <strong>in</strong>tensify dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
further development. Thus, an idea put forward by Leonard (1991) was to conceive<br />
SLI not as impairment but the lower end <strong>of</strong> a normal distribution (also cf. Tombl<strong>in</strong> &<br />
P<strong>and</strong>ich, 1999). That is, SLI children are assumed to acquire their first words <strong>and</strong> word<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ations later than age-controls but otherwise to mirror the patterns <strong>of</strong> normally<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g children.<br />
Pre-schoolers with SLI usually are characterized by their limited speech production<br />
(whereas their language perception is much better developed); by their late acquisition<br />
<strong>of</strong> first words <strong>and</strong> word comb<strong>in</strong>ations; <strong>and</strong> by their special difficulties with phonological,<br />
morphological, <strong>and</strong> syntactic structure. For most SLI children, there seems to exist a<br />
relatively monotonic distance between the level <strong>of</strong> language perception <strong>and</strong> speech<br />
production (cf. Grimm, 2003). However, semantic <strong>and</strong> pragmatic abilities were found to<br />
be relatively <strong>in</strong>tact (but see the discussion <strong>in</strong> Tombl<strong>in</strong> & P<strong>and</strong>ich, 1999), even though,<br />
they may have some word f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g difficulties <strong>in</strong>dicated by pauses, non-specific words<br />
(“stuff”, “th<strong>in</strong>g”) <strong>and</strong> phonological <strong>and</strong> semantic word substitutions.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> SLI children are their syntactical <strong>and</strong> morphological<br />
deficiencies. Their problems may be especially severe for grammatical morphology:<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> most grammatical morphemes is lower <strong>and</strong> mastery is atta<strong>in</strong>ed later <strong>in</strong> children<br />
with SLI. It rema<strong>in</strong>s unclear, if these morphosyntactic deficiencies should be characterized<br />
as quantitative (i.e., SLI children show <strong>in</strong>tact grammatical knowledge but are<br />
delayed <strong>in</strong> its acquisition) or as qualitative difference (cf. Grimm, 2003; Leonard, 1998).<br />
Children with SLI use specific syntactic structures less frequently than age-controls <strong>and</strong><br />
perform worse on measures that concern syntactic complexity <strong>and</strong> syntactic comprehension<br />
(e.g., reversible passives). Even though they use most argument structures, there is