07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Specific Language Impairment 76<br />

6.2 Delayed <strong>and</strong> impaired language development<br />

Children with language impairment <strong>of</strong>ten were “late talkers”. These produce their first<br />

words relatively late <strong>and</strong> have a vocabulary <strong>of</strong> less than 50 different words at the age <strong>of</strong><br />

24 months. In contrast, children with TLD usually acquire these 50 words much earlier<br />

(around 18 to 19 months) <strong>and</strong> have a vocabulary <strong>of</strong> around 300 words at 24 months. It<br />

enables them to produce their first two-words-sentences (cf. Leonard, 1998). 12-20<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> all children did not reach the 50-words-threshold at 24 months. Around half<br />

<strong>of</strong> these children are “late bloomers”. They return to normal levels <strong>of</strong> language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency<br />

by the end <strong>of</strong> the third year <strong>of</strong> life. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g half <strong>of</strong> the children shows a<br />

delayed language development <strong>and</strong> is mostly diagnosed as hav<strong>in</strong>g specific language<br />

impairment. Approach<strong>in</strong>g the 50-words-threshold leads to a differentiation <strong>of</strong> the vocabulary<br />

<strong>and</strong> the acquisition <strong>of</strong> syntactic regularities (see chapter “Language perception”).<br />

Thus, the delay children have <strong>in</strong> their language development may <strong>in</strong>tensify dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

further development. Thus, an idea put forward by Leonard (1991) was to conceive<br />

SLI not as impairment but the lower end <strong>of</strong> a normal distribution (also cf. Tombl<strong>in</strong> &<br />

P<strong>and</strong>ich, 1999). That is, SLI children are assumed to acquire their first words <strong>and</strong> word<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ations later than age-controls but otherwise to mirror the patterns <strong>of</strong> normally<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g children.<br />

Pre-schoolers with SLI usually are characterized by their limited speech production<br />

(whereas their language perception is much better developed); by their late acquisition<br />

<strong>of</strong> first words <strong>and</strong> word comb<strong>in</strong>ations; <strong>and</strong> by their special difficulties with phonological,<br />

morphological, <strong>and</strong> syntactic structure. For most SLI children, there seems to exist a<br />

relatively monotonic distance between the level <strong>of</strong> language perception <strong>and</strong> speech<br />

production (cf. Grimm, 2003). However, semantic <strong>and</strong> pragmatic abilities were found to<br />

be relatively <strong>in</strong>tact (but see the discussion <strong>in</strong> Tombl<strong>in</strong> & P<strong>and</strong>ich, 1999), even though,<br />

they may have some word f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g difficulties <strong>in</strong>dicated by pauses, non-specific words<br />

(“stuff”, “th<strong>in</strong>g”) <strong>and</strong> phonological <strong>and</strong> semantic word substitutions.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> SLI children are their syntactical <strong>and</strong> morphological<br />

deficiencies. Their problems may be especially severe for grammatical morphology:<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> most grammatical morphemes is lower <strong>and</strong> mastery is atta<strong>in</strong>ed later <strong>in</strong> children<br />

with SLI. It rema<strong>in</strong>s unclear, if these morphosyntactic deficiencies should be characterized<br />

as quantitative (i.e., SLI children show <strong>in</strong>tact grammatical knowledge but are<br />

delayed <strong>in</strong> its acquisition) or as qualitative difference (cf. Grimm, 2003; Leonard, 1998).<br />

Children with SLI use specific syntactic structures less frequently than age-controls <strong>and</strong><br />

perform worse on measures that concern syntactic complexity <strong>and</strong> syntactic comprehension<br />

(e.g., reversible passives). Even though they use most argument structures, there is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!