07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Electroencephalography <strong>and</strong> Event-Related Potentials 90<br />

Figure 7-2 Schematic overview <strong>of</strong> record<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g an EEG. Data (right-top) are recorded from<br />

several positions at the scalp (left-middle). Data are pre-processed (e.g., filtered, rejected).<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, trials <strong>of</strong> the experimental conditions were averaged, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> event-related potentials<br />

(left-bottom). Different conditions are <strong>in</strong>dicated by different colors <strong>of</strong> the ERPs <strong>and</strong><br />

their respective trigger marks <strong>in</strong> the EEG.<br />

Filter<strong>in</strong>g: The basic idea <strong>of</strong> filter<strong>in</strong>g EEG data is to remove frequency components that<br />

are regarded to represent noise. Filter may be either high-pass (remov<strong>in</strong>g low frequency<br />

components; e.g., electrode drifts), low-pass (remov<strong>in</strong>g high frequency components;<br />

e.g., muscle tension), or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> high- <strong>and</strong> low-pass filters (i.e., b<strong>and</strong>-pass or<br />

b<strong>and</strong>-stop filter). Filter design <strong>in</strong>volves f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a good compromise between reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> extraneous <strong>and</strong> the preservation <strong>of</strong> as much as possible from the fidelity <strong>of</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong><br />

waves that should be observed.<br />

Remov<strong>in</strong>g ICA components: Basically, an ICA separates EEG activity <strong>in</strong>to a number <strong>of</strong><br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ct temporally maximally <strong>in</strong>dependent components (that may reflect either particular<br />

bra<strong>in</strong> processes or artefacts; Bell & Sejnowski, 1996; Makeig, Jung, Bell, Ghahremani,<br />

& Sejnowski, 1997). Particular components that are regarded to reflect noise are<br />

rejected. This decision may be based on the scalp distribution <strong>of</strong> the component, on its<br />

frequency spectrum, or on the time course <strong>of</strong> the components activity (e.g., its co<strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

with an eye-bl<strong>in</strong>k artefact <strong>in</strong> the EEG data).<br />

Reject<strong>in</strong>g artefact-loaden trials: Reject<strong>in</strong>g denotes the exclusion <strong>of</strong> trials on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

particular, mostly statistical, criteria (e.g., if the amplitudes with<strong>in</strong> that trial exceed a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!