07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Music</strong>al Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 28<br />

In addition to the differences <strong>in</strong> auditory <strong>and</strong> motor regions further difference may be<br />

found <strong>in</strong> other bra<strong>in</strong> regions. In adults with musical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce early childhood, the<br />

bra<strong>in</strong> white matter differed significantly from controls, demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the strong effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> early musical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (Bengtsson et al., 2005; Schlaug et al., 1995).<br />

Gaser <strong>and</strong> Schlaug (2003) compared the whole bra<strong>in</strong> morphology <strong>of</strong> musicians, amateur-musicians<br />

<strong>and</strong> non-musicians <strong>and</strong> observed a significant positive correlation between<br />

musician status <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> grey matter volume <strong>in</strong> perirol<strong>and</strong>ic regions <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

primary motor <strong>and</strong> somatosensory areas, premotor areas, <strong>and</strong> the left cerebellum;<br />

Heschl’s gyrus, anterior superior parietal areas, <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ferior temporal gyrus (bilaterally<br />

<strong>in</strong> all these regions), <strong>and</strong> the left <strong>in</strong>ferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Remarkably, there<br />

were no areas with a significant decrease <strong>in</strong> grey matter volume <strong>in</strong> musicians. For most<br />

<strong>of</strong> these regions found enlarged, similar results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> earlier studies. However,<br />

additional enlargements were also found <strong>in</strong> anterior superior parietal areas, <strong>in</strong>volved<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation from different sensory modalities. These differences<br />

might be implicated <strong>in</strong> the superior spatial-visual process<strong>in</strong>g found <strong>in</strong> musicians<br />

(see below; see also Hetl<strong>and</strong>, 2000), <strong>and</strong> may contribute to sight-read<strong>in</strong>g which <strong>in</strong>volves<br />

the fast <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> multimodal sensory <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> motor preparation (Sergent,<br />

Zuck, Terriah, & MacDonald, 1992).<br />

Notably, Gaser <strong>and</strong> Schlaug found differences for the left IFG which conta<strong>in</strong>s Broca’s<br />

area: Slum<strong>in</strong>g et al. (2002, 2007) observed an <strong>in</strong>creased grey matter volume <strong>of</strong> musicians<br />

for this bra<strong>in</strong> region. This region is crucially <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> musical<br />

<strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntax. Put to a more abstract level, this region is essential for the process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> ordered sequences. Many skills, required by <strong>in</strong>strumentalists, are associated<br />

with the analysis <strong>of</strong> sequential sounds <strong>and</strong> the transformation <strong>of</strong> musical notation <strong>in</strong>to<br />

motor sequences: listen<strong>in</strong>g for the accuracy <strong>of</strong> a musical performance while read<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

musical score – a sequence-check<strong>in</strong>g task – activated the left IFG (Parsons, 2001), as<br />

did musical syntax process<strong>in</strong>g (Koelsch, Fritz et al., 2005; Maess et al., 2001), process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>and</strong> organization <strong>of</strong> sequential sound stimuli (Platel et al., 1997), <strong>and</strong> sight read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(Sergent et al., 1992).<br />

3.4 Neuronal functional effects <strong>of</strong> musical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Koelsch <strong>and</strong> Siebel (2005) proposed a model <strong>of</strong> the process<strong>in</strong>g steps <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> music<br />

perception (for detailed description <strong>and</strong> Figure, see chapter “<strong>Music</strong> perception”). This<br />

model is utilized as a framework to structure the evidence <strong>of</strong> neuronal functional differences<br />

between musicians <strong>and</strong> non-musicians which is reviewed here.<br />

A considerable amount <strong>of</strong> first, sub-cortical process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the auditory signal takes place<br />

<strong>in</strong> auditory bra<strong>in</strong>-stem <strong>and</strong> thalamus. Differences between musicians <strong>and</strong> non-musicians

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!