07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Language Perception 61<br />

<strong>and</strong> abstract representations <strong>of</strong> constructions develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal structure. Then pat-<br />

terns <strong>of</strong> relationships build up between constructions <strong>and</strong> their parts, lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

complexity <strong>and</strong> schematization. Thus, recent constructivist accounts suggest that the<br />

abstract transitive construction builds up from a number <strong>of</strong> different sources: pre-verbal<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> causality, the ability to match arguments <strong>in</strong> an utterance to referents <strong>in</strong> the<br />

environment, the development <strong>of</strong> other lexically specific constructions around pronouns,<br />

<strong>and</strong> high-frequency items. For example, Fern<strong>and</strong>es et al. (2006) demonstrate a<br />

receptive underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> argument structure <strong>in</strong> two-year olds. These were able to map<br />

a s<strong>in</strong>gle scene onto two dist<strong>in</strong>ct syntactic frames (transitive <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>transitive).<br />

A fundamental mechanism for the acquisition <strong>of</strong> syntactic regularities is statistical<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g (see above). 10 Gomez <strong>and</strong> Gerken (1999) exposed 12-month-olds to str<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong><br />

syllable-words produced by one <strong>of</strong> two complex grammars, lead<strong>in</strong>g to considerable<br />

variability <strong>in</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> the words with<strong>in</strong> the sentences (i.e., a certa<strong>in</strong> word could<br />

occur <strong>in</strong> different positions <strong>in</strong> the sentence). After a brief exposure (50 up to 127 seconds)<br />

to a subset <strong>of</strong> str<strong>in</strong>gs, generated by a tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g grammar, <strong>in</strong>fants were tested for<br />

discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> new str<strong>in</strong>gs from the two different grammars. Infants listened longer<br />

to new str<strong>in</strong>gs from their tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g grammar than to str<strong>in</strong>gs from another grammar. Although<br />

they were never tested on the exact str<strong>in</strong>gs encountered dur<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, the<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts placed on word order<strong>in</strong>g were the same dur<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> test. This demonstrates<br />

that learn<strong>in</strong>g generalized to novel str<strong>in</strong>gs with familiar co-occurrence patterns.<br />

Likewise, Marcus, Vijayan, B<strong>and</strong>i Rao, <strong>and</strong> Vishton (1999) demonstrated that <strong>in</strong>fants<br />

can abstract beyond specific word order <strong>and</strong> acquire algebra-like rules (<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g substitution<br />

<strong>of</strong> arbitrary elements <strong>in</strong> a sequence <strong>of</strong> abstract variables): Seven-month-olds were<br />

familiarized with syllable str<strong>in</strong>gs based on a certa<strong>in</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g pattern (ABB vs. ABA)<br />

that was the same for tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> for test, however with a different vocabulary <strong>of</strong> syllables<br />

(e.g., wi-di-wi vs. ba-po-ba). Infants discrim<strong>in</strong>ated str<strong>in</strong>gs with the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g patterns<br />

from those with a different pattern despite the change <strong>in</strong> vocabulary. Very likely operations<br />

over abstract (rather than perceptually bound) variables are the basis for the acquisition<br />

<strong>of</strong> algebra-like rules. Such rules may be a basis for l<strong>in</strong>guistic productivity (e.g.,<br />

children have to learn that determ<strong>in</strong>ers precede nouns, etc.).<br />

Although sensitivity to word order is necessary for track<strong>in</strong>g sequential <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong><br />

sentences, learners must ultimately abstract beyond the order<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> specific words. The<br />

experiment <strong>of</strong> Gomez <strong>and</strong> Gerken (1999) outl<strong>in</strong>ed above suggests that <strong>in</strong>fants had abstracted<br />

some aspect <strong>of</strong> grammatical structure. The detection non-adjacent dependencies<br />

might be a first step <strong>in</strong>to grammar (Bonatti, Pena, Nespor, & Mehler, 2005; Gomez,<br />

10<br />

Such learn<strong>in</strong>g mechanism are only proposed by <strong>in</strong>teractionist accounts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!