Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Language Perception 61<br />
<strong>and</strong> abstract representations <strong>of</strong> constructions develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal structure. Then pat-<br />
terns <strong>of</strong> relationships build up between constructions <strong>and</strong> their parts, lead<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />
complexity <strong>and</strong> schematization. Thus, recent constructivist accounts suggest that the<br />
abstract transitive construction builds up from a number <strong>of</strong> different sources: pre-verbal<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> causality, the ability to match arguments <strong>in</strong> an utterance to referents <strong>in</strong> the<br />
environment, the development <strong>of</strong> other lexically specific constructions around pronouns,<br />
<strong>and</strong> high-frequency items. For example, Fern<strong>and</strong>es et al. (2006) demonstrate a<br />
receptive underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> argument structure <strong>in</strong> two-year olds. These were able to map<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle scene onto two dist<strong>in</strong>ct syntactic frames (transitive <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>transitive).<br />
A fundamental mechanism for the acquisition <strong>of</strong> syntactic regularities is statistical<br />
learn<strong>in</strong>g (see above). 10 Gomez <strong>and</strong> Gerken (1999) exposed 12-month-olds to str<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong><br />
syllable-words produced by one <strong>of</strong> two complex grammars, lead<strong>in</strong>g to considerable<br />
variability <strong>in</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> the words with<strong>in</strong> the sentences (i.e., a certa<strong>in</strong> word could<br />
occur <strong>in</strong> different positions <strong>in</strong> the sentence). After a brief exposure (50 up to 127 seconds)<br />
to a subset <strong>of</strong> str<strong>in</strong>gs, generated by a tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g grammar, <strong>in</strong>fants were tested for<br />
discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> new str<strong>in</strong>gs from the two different grammars. Infants listened longer<br />
to new str<strong>in</strong>gs from their tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g grammar than to str<strong>in</strong>gs from another grammar. Although<br />
they were never tested on the exact str<strong>in</strong>gs encountered dur<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, the<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts placed on word order<strong>in</strong>g were the same dur<strong>in</strong>g tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> test. This demonstrates<br />
that learn<strong>in</strong>g generalized to novel str<strong>in</strong>gs with familiar co-occurrence patterns.<br />
Likewise, Marcus, Vijayan, B<strong>and</strong>i Rao, <strong>and</strong> Vishton (1999) demonstrated that <strong>in</strong>fants<br />
can abstract beyond specific word order <strong>and</strong> acquire algebra-like rules (<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g substitution<br />
<strong>of</strong> arbitrary elements <strong>in</strong> a sequence <strong>of</strong> abstract variables): Seven-month-olds were<br />
familiarized with syllable str<strong>in</strong>gs based on a certa<strong>in</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g pattern (ABB vs. ABA)<br />
that was the same for tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> for test, however with a different vocabulary <strong>of</strong> syllables<br />
(e.g., wi-di-wi vs. ba-po-ba). Infants discrim<strong>in</strong>ated str<strong>in</strong>gs with the tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g patterns<br />
from those with a different pattern despite the change <strong>in</strong> vocabulary. Very likely operations<br />
over abstract (rather than perceptually bound) variables are the basis for the acquisition<br />
<strong>of</strong> algebra-like rules. Such rules may be a basis for l<strong>in</strong>guistic productivity (e.g.,<br />
children have to learn that determ<strong>in</strong>ers precede nouns, etc.).<br />
Although sensitivity to word order is necessary for track<strong>in</strong>g sequential <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong><br />
sentences, learners must ultimately abstract beyond the order<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> specific words. The<br />
experiment <strong>of</strong> Gomez <strong>and</strong> Gerken (1999) outl<strong>in</strong>ed above suggests that <strong>in</strong>fants had abstracted<br />
some aspect <strong>of</strong> grammatical structure. The detection non-adjacent dependencies<br />
might be a first step <strong>in</strong>to grammar (Bonatti, Pena, Nespor, & Mehler, 2005; Gomez,<br />
10<br />
Such learn<strong>in</strong>g mechanism are only proposed by <strong>in</strong>teractionist accounts.