07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Music</strong> Perception 17<br />

MMN paradigms may be employed to <strong>in</strong>vestigate to <strong>in</strong>vestigate relations between musical<br />

events that differ <strong>in</strong> their level <strong>of</strong> abstractness. Firstly, simple feature relations may<br />

be <strong>in</strong>vestigated (e.g., tones deviat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> frequency). In <strong>in</strong>fants, Kushnerenko, Ceponiene,<br />

Balan, Fellman, & Näätänen (2002) demonstrated an MMN <strong>in</strong> response to the detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> pitch change that develops dur<strong>in</strong>g the first year <strong>of</strong> life. J<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Benasich (2006)<br />

found no MMN at 3 months while it became apparent at 4 to 5 months <strong>and</strong> was robust<br />

at 6 months. An MMN may be elicited by violations <strong>of</strong> an abstract regularity (such as<br />

<strong>in</strong>frequent tone pairs <strong>of</strong> descend<strong>in</strong>g pitch <strong>in</strong> a sequence <strong>of</strong> tone pairs <strong>of</strong> ascend<strong>in</strong>g pitch;<br />

see Korzyukov, W<strong>in</strong>kler, Gumenyuk, & Alho, 2003). Fujioka, Tra<strong>in</strong>or, Ross, Kakigi,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Pantev (2004) <strong>in</strong>vestigated the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> melodic contour <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval structure.<br />

An MMN was evoked by pitch contour <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval deviations demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

automatic process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> abstract changes <strong>in</strong> both, melody <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval, <strong>in</strong> the auditory<br />

cortex. A recent study by Brattico, Tervaniemi, Näätänen, <strong>and</strong> Peretz (2006) presented<br />

non-musicians with unfamiliar melodies, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g pitch deviants that either went out<strong>of</strong>-key<br />

(one semitone apart from the preced<strong>in</strong>g pitch) or out-<strong>of</strong>-tune (a quartertone apart<br />

from the preced<strong>in</strong>g pitch). These deviants elicited a MMN <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a fast <strong>and</strong> automatic<br />

extraction <strong>of</strong> the relational properties <strong>of</strong> a musical scale. For contour representation,<br />

the right superior temporal gyrus (STG) is proposed to be crucial, whereas both<br />

the right <strong>and</strong> left temporal structures appear to be <strong>in</strong>volved when <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />

required (Ayotte, Peretz, Rousseau, Bard, & Bojanowski, 2000; Liegeois-Chauvel,<br />

Peretz, Babai, Laguitton, & Chauvel, 1998; Peretz, 1990; Vignolo, 2003). Two types <strong>of</strong><br />

temporal organization appear fundamental: rhythmic group<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> metrical regularity.<br />

The cerebellum <strong>and</strong> the basal ganglia are presumably central for the controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

motor <strong>and</strong> perceptual tim<strong>in</strong>g (Janata & Grafton, 2003). As for harmony, the metrical<br />

organization is (at least to some extent) determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the abstract knowledge about the<br />

Western metrical system (Palmer & Krumhansl, 1990).<br />

Even particular aspects <strong>of</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g polyphonic music are processed at this stage:<br />

Fujioka, Tra<strong>in</strong>or, Ross, Kakigi, <strong>and</strong> Pantev (2005) <strong>in</strong>vestigated this <strong>in</strong> a MMN paradigm<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g four deviations that occurred either <strong>in</strong> the high or the low voice <strong>and</strong> either left the<br />

key or rema<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> the key <strong>of</strong> the melody. A larger MMN was found for deviants <strong>in</strong><br />

the high voice than <strong>in</strong> the low voice, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that melodic <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>of</strong> each voice<br />

is encoded separately, with the higher voice more salient than the lower. An enlarged<br />

MMN was also observed for <strong>in</strong>-key compared to out-<strong>of</strong>-key changes which might reflect<br />

the size <strong>of</strong> change (2 vs. 1 semitone for <strong>in</strong>-key vs. out-<strong>of</strong>-key changes). This <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />

that tonality is most presumably processed at subsequent cognitive stages. The<br />

bra<strong>in</strong> regions <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> selectively listen<strong>in</strong>g to one stream with<strong>in</strong> polyphonic music<br />

were <strong>in</strong>vestigated by Janata, Tillmann, <strong>and</strong> Bharucha (2002). They found a similar spa-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!