Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Music</strong> Perception 17<br />
MMN paradigms may be employed to <strong>in</strong>vestigate to <strong>in</strong>vestigate relations between musical<br />
events that differ <strong>in</strong> their level <strong>of</strong> abstractness. Firstly, simple feature relations may<br />
be <strong>in</strong>vestigated (e.g., tones deviat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> frequency). In <strong>in</strong>fants, Kushnerenko, Ceponiene,<br />
Balan, Fellman, & Näätänen (2002) demonstrated an MMN <strong>in</strong> response to the detection<br />
<strong>of</strong> pitch change that develops dur<strong>in</strong>g the first year <strong>of</strong> life. J<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Benasich (2006)<br />
found no MMN at 3 months while it became apparent at 4 to 5 months <strong>and</strong> was robust<br />
at 6 months. An MMN may be elicited by violations <strong>of</strong> an abstract regularity (such as<br />
<strong>in</strong>frequent tone pairs <strong>of</strong> descend<strong>in</strong>g pitch <strong>in</strong> a sequence <strong>of</strong> tone pairs <strong>of</strong> ascend<strong>in</strong>g pitch;<br />
see Korzyukov, W<strong>in</strong>kler, Gumenyuk, & Alho, 2003). Fujioka, Tra<strong>in</strong>or, Ross, Kakigi,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Pantev (2004) <strong>in</strong>vestigated the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> melodic contour <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval structure.<br />
An MMN was evoked by pitch contour <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval deviations demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
automatic process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> abstract changes <strong>in</strong> both, melody <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval, <strong>in</strong> the auditory<br />
cortex. A recent study by Brattico, Tervaniemi, Näätänen, <strong>and</strong> Peretz (2006) presented<br />
non-musicians with unfamiliar melodies, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g pitch deviants that either went out<strong>of</strong>-key<br />
(one semitone apart from the preced<strong>in</strong>g pitch) or out-<strong>of</strong>-tune (a quartertone apart<br />
from the preced<strong>in</strong>g pitch). These deviants elicited a MMN <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a fast <strong>and</strong> automatic<br />
extraction <strong>of</strong> the relational properties <strong>of</strong> a musical scale. For contour representation,<br />
the right superior temporal gyrus (STG) is proposed to be crucial, whereas both<br />
the right <strong>and</strong> left temporal structures appear to be <strong>in</strong>volved when <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>in</strong>formation is<br />
required (Ayotte, Peretz, Rousseau, Bard, & Bojanowski, 2000; Liegeois-Chauvel,<br />
Peretz, Babai, Laguitton, & Chauvel, 1998; Peretz, 1990; Vignolo, 2003). Two types <strong>of</strong><br />
temporal organization appear fundamental: rhythmic group<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> metrical regularity.<br />
The cerebellum <strong>and</strong> the basal ganglia are presumably central for the controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
motor <strong>and</strong> perceptual tim<strong>in</strong>g (Janata & Grafton, 2003). As for harmony, the metrical<br />
organization is (at least to some extent) determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the abstract knowledge about the<br />
Western metrical system (Palmer & Krumhansl, 1990).<br />
Even particular aspects <strong>of</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g polyphonic music are processed at this stage:<br />
Fujioka, Tra<strong>in</strong>or, Ross, Kakigi, <strong>and</strong> Pantev (2005) <strong>in</strong>vestigated this <strong>in</strong> a MMN paradigm<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g four deviations that occurred either <strong>in</strong> the high or the low voice <strong>and</strong> either left the<br />
key or rema<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> the key <strong>of</strong> the melody. A larger MMN was found for deviants <strong>in</strong><br />
the high voice than <strong>in</strong> the low voice, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that melodic <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>of</strong> each voice<br />
is encoded separately, with the higher voice more salient than the lower. An enlarged<br />
MMN was also observed for <strong>in</strong>-key compared to out-<strong>of</strong>-key changes which might reflect<br />
the size <strong>of</strong> change (2 vs. 1 semitone for <strong>in</strong>-key vs. out-<strong>of</strong>-key changes). This <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
that tonality is most presumably processed at subsequent cognitive stages. The<br />
bra<strong>in</strong> regions <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> selectively listen<strong>in</strong>g to one stream with<strong>in</strong> polyphonic music<br />
were <strong>in</strong>vestigated by Janata, Tillmann, <strong>and</strong> Bharucha (2002). They found a similar spa-