Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 191 Koelsch, S., & Siebel, W. A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 578-584. Kohonen, T. (2006). Self-organizing neural projections. Neural Netw, 19(6-7), 723-733. Korzyukov, O. A., Winkler, I., Gumenyuk, V. I., & Alho, K. (2003). Processing abstract auditory features in the human auditory cortex. Neuroimage, 20(4), 2245-2258. Kotz, S. A., Frisch, S., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Syntactic language processing: ERP lesion data on the role of the basal ganglia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9(7), 1053-1060. Kotz, S. A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Differentiation of syntactic processes in the left and right anterior temporal lobe: Event-related brain potential evidence from lesion patients. Brain and Language, 87(1), 135-136. Kovas, Y., Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., Oliver, B., Dale, P. S., Bishop, D. V. M., & Plomin, R. (2005). Genetic influences in different aspects of language development: the etiology of language skills in 4.5-year-old twins. Child Development, 76(3), 632- 651. Kraus, N., McGee, T. J., Carrell, T. D., Zecker, S. G., Nicol, T. G., & Koch, D. B. (1996). Auditory Neurophysiologic Responses and Discrimination Deficits in Children with Learning Problems. Science, 273(5277), 971-973. Krings, T., Topper, R., Foltys, H., Erberich, S., Sparing, R., Willmes, K., et al. (2000). Cortical activation patterns during complex motor tasks in piano players and control subjects. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Letters, 278(3), 189-193. Krumhansl, C. L. (1979). The Psychological Representation of Musical Pitch in a Tonal Context. Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 346-374. Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press. Krumhansl, C. L. (2003). Experimental strategies for understanding the role of experience in music cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 414- 428. Krumhansl, C. L., Bharucha, J., & Castellano, M. A. (1982). Key distance effects on perceived harmonic structure in music. Perception and Psychophysics, 32(2), 96- 108. Krumhansl, C. L., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1990). Infants’ perception of phrase structure in music. Psychological Science, 1(1), 70-73. Krumhansl, C. L., & Keil, F. C. (1982). Acquisition of the hierarchy of tonal functions in music. Memory and Cognition, 10(3), 243-251. Krumhansl, C. L., & Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89(4), 334-368. Kuhl, P. K. (1979). Speech perception in early infancy: Perceptual constancy for spectrally dissimilar vowel categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(6), 1668-1679. Kuhl, P. K. (1983). Perception of auditory equivalence classes for speech in early infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 6(2-3), 263-285. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50(2), 93-107. Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(22), 11850-11857.
References 192 Kuhl, P. K. (2003). Human speech and birdsong: communication and the social brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(17), 9645-9646. Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831-843. Kuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D. (1982). Discrimination of auditory target dimensions in the presence or absence of variation in a second dimension by infants. Perception and Psychophysics, 31(3), 279-292. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(15), 9096-9101. Kushnerenko, E., Ceponiene, R., Balan, P., Fellman, V., Huotilaine, M., & Näätänen, R. (2002). Maturation of the auditory event-related potentials during the first year of life. Neuroreport, 13(1), 47-51. Kushnerenko, E., Ceponiene, R., Balan, P., Fellman, V., & Näätänen, R. (2002). Maturation of the auditory change detection response in infants: a longitudinal ERP study. Neuroreport, 13(15), 1843-1848. Kushnerenko, E., Ceponiene, R., Fellman, V., Huotilainen, M., & Winkler, I. (2001). Event-related potential correlates of sound duration: similar pattern from birth to adulthood. Neuroreport, 12(17), 3777-3781. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205. Lahey, M. (1990). Who shall be called language disordered? Some reflections and one perspective. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(4), 612-620. Lahey, M., Edwards, J., & Munson, B. (2001). Is processing speed related to severity of language impairment? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(6), 1354-1361. Lai, C. S., Fisher, S. E., Hurst, J. A., Vargha-Khadem, F., & Monaco, A. P. (2001). A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature, 413(6855), 519-523. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (pp. 112-146). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Lau, E., Stroud, C., Plesch, S., & Phillips, C. (2006). The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain and Language, 98(1), 74-88. Lee, D. J., Chen, Y., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Corpus callosum: musician and gender effects. Neuroreport, 14(2), 205-209. Leman, M. (1995). A model of retroactive tone-center perception. Music Perception, 12(4), 439-471. Leman, M., Lesaffre, M., & Tanghe, K. (2005). IPEM Toolbox for Perception-Based Music Analysis (Version 1.02). from http://www.ipem.ugent.be/Toolbox/index.html Leonard, L. B. (1981). Facilitating linguistic skills in children with specific language impairment. Applied Psychiolinguistics, 2, 89-118. Leonard, L. B. (1991). Specific Language Impairment as a Clinical Category. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 22(2), 66-68. Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Page 1 and 2:
Sebastian Jentschke: Neural Correla
Page 3 and 4:
Gutachter der Arbeit Prof. Dr. Ange
Page 6 and 7:
Table of contents 1 Introduction 1
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTS IX 7 Electroencep
Page 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI Abbreviations
Page 13 and 14:
Zusammenfassung der wissenschaftlic
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 20 and 21:
1 Introduction Language and music a
Page 22 and 23:
2 Music Perception Music is one of
Page 24 and 25:
Music Perception 5 to her infant re
Page 26 and 27:
Music Perception 7 chronize movemen
Page 28 and 29:
Music Perception 9 at 5 years of ag
Page 30 and 31:
Music Perception 11 keys related by
Page 32 and 33:
Music Perception 13 Krumhansl and S
Page 34 and 35:
Music Perception 15 tion. The proce
Page 36 and 37:
Music Perception 17 MMN paradigms m
Page 38 and 39:
Music Perception 19 In a study, emp
Page 40 and 41:
Music Perception 21 2001a). Janata
Page 42 and 43:
3 Musical Training Performing a pie
Page 44 and 45:
Musical Training 25 Deliberate prac
Page 46 and 47:
Musical Training 27 them to transfe
Page 48 and 49:
Musical Training 29 can be found ev
Page 50 and 51:
Musical Training 31 dition (and onl
Page 52 and 53:
Musical Training 33 without substan
Page 54 and 55:
Musical Training 35 such studies sh
Page 56:
Musical Training 37 with regard to
Page 59 and 60:
Music and Language 40 Brown (2000)
Page 61 and 62:
Music and Language 42 ture (for a r
Page 63 and 64:
Music and Language 44 Neural constr
Page 65 and 66:
Music and Language 46 pitch registe
Page 67 and 68:
Music and Language 48 functions. Th
Page 69 and 70:
Music and Language 50 found from ve
Page 71 and 72:
Language Perception 52 cross-langua
Page 73 and 74:
Language Perception 54 ing that a w
Page 75 and 76:
Language Perception 56 Perceptual g
Page 77 and 78:
Language Perception 58 Social const
Page 79 and 80:
Language Perception 60 Syntax After
Page 81 and 82:
Language Perception 62 2002; Newpor
Page 83 and 84:
Language Perception 64 Complex synt
Page 85 and 86:
Language Perception 66 which these
Page 87 and 88:
Language Perception 68 interaction
Page 89 and 90:
Language Perception 70 only disrupt
Page 91 and 92:
Language Perception 72 tic structur
Page 93 and 94:
Specific Language Impairment 74 ind
Page 95 and 96:
Specific Language Impairment 76 6.2
Page 97 and 98:
Specific Language Impairment 78 6.3
Page 99 and 100:
Specific Language Impairment 80 (Be
Page 101 and 102:
Specific Language Impairment 82 ply
Page 103 and 104:
Specific Language Impairment 84 mis
Page 105 and 106:
Specific Language Impairment 86 the
Page 107 and 108:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 109 and 110:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 112:
8 Experiments I - IV: Introduction
Page 115 and 116:
Experiment I 96 parents. 13 All chi
Page 117 and 118:
Experiment I 98 patterns in short-t
Page 119 and 120:
Experiment I 100 -1.02 μV, SEM =0.
Page 121 and 122:
Experiment I 102 EAD Figure 9-3 Gra
Page 123 and 124:
Experiment I 104 amplitude size of
Page 126 and 127:
10 Experiment II: Neural correlates
Page 128 and 129:
Experiment II 109 Stimuli and parad
Page 130 and 131:
Experiment II 111 tion of objects;
Page 132 and 133:
Experiment II 113 amplitude in the
Page 134 and 135:
Experiment II 115 as compared to no
Page 136 and 137:
Experiment II 117 negative) amplitu
Page 138 and 139:
Experiment II 119 expectancy of a r
Page 140 and 141:
Experiment II 121 physical judgemen
Page 142 and 143:
11 Experiment III: Neural correlate
Page 144 and 145:
Experiment III 125 periment IV - wh
Page 146 and 147:
Experiment III 127 cational backgro
Page 148 and 149:
Experiment III 129 due to a differe
Page 150 and 151:
Experiment III 131 scalp sites. Pla
Page 152 and 153:
Experiment III 133 of syntactic reg
Page 154 and 155:
Experiment III 135 Even though desc
Page 156:
Experiment III 137 ion than in the
Page 159 and 160: Experiment IV 140 cluded), [2] they
Page 161 and 162: Experiment IV 142 12.3 Results Coho
Page 163 and 164: Experiment IV 144 Figure 12-3 summa
Page 165 and 166: Experiment IV 146 p < 0.001). In th
Page 167 and 168: Experiment IV 148 tion cross vs. si
Page 169 and 170: Experiment IV 150 anterior: F(1,39)
Page 171 and 172: Experiment IV 152 An N5 usually fol
Page 174 and 175: 13 Experiment I - IV: Development o
Page 176: Development of the Neural Correlate
Page 179 and 180: General Discussion 160 and Leonard,
Page 181 and 182: General Discussion 162 sent in the
Page 183 and 184: General Discussion 164 economic sta
Page 185 and 186: General Discussion 166 Friederici,
Page 187 and 188: General Discussion 168 year old chi
Page 190 and 191: Lists of figures and tables Figure
Page 192 and 193: References Abney, S. P. (1989). A c
Page 194 and 195: References 175 Bharucha, J. J., & S
Page 196 and 197: References 177 Brattico, E., Tervan
Page 198 and 199: References 179 Creel, S. C., Newpor
Page 200 and 201: References 181 Farrell, M. M., & Ph
Page 202 and 203: References 183 Friedrich, M., & Fri
Page 204 and 205: References 185 logie. Themenbereich
Page 206 and 207: References 187 Hoff, E., & Tian, C.
Page 208 and 209: References 189 Jones, M. R. (1982).
Page 212 and 213: References 193 Leonard, L. B. (2000
Page 214 and 215: References 195 McMullen, E., & Saff
Page 216 and 217: References 197 Nobre, A. C., Coull,
Page 218 and 219: References 199 Peretz, I. (1990). P
Page 220 and 221: References 201 Roederer, J. (1984).
Page 222 and 223: References 203 Schöler, H. (2004).
Page 224 and 225: References 205 Sluming, V., Brooks,
Page 226 and 227: References 207 Thompson, W. F., Sch
Page 228 and 229: References 209 Trehub, S. E. (2003c
Page 230: References 211 Weinert, S. (1991).
Page 233 and 234: Appendix A-2 014 incorrect Das Nilp
Page 235 and 236: Appendix A-4 044 correct Der Rasen
Page 237 and 238: Appendix A-6 073 incorrect Die Medi
Page 240 and 241: Curriculum vitae Sebastian Jentschk
Page 242: Selbstständigkeitserklärung Hierm
Page 246 and 247: MPI Series in Human Cognitive and B
Page 248 and 249: 32 André J. Szameitat Die Funktion
Page 250 and 251: 63 Ann Pannekamp Prosodische Inform
Page 252: 96 Marcel Braß Das inferior fronta
show all

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?