Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 193 Leonard, L. B. (2000). Specific language impairment across languages. In D. V. M. Bishop & L. B. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 115-130). Hove: Psychology Press. Leonard, L. B., & Bortolini, U. (1998). Grammatical Morphology and the Role of Weak Syllables in the Speech of Italian-Speaking Children With Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(6), 1363- 1374. Leonard, L. B., Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U., & Deevy, P. (2004). Specific Language Impairment in Children: A Comparison of English and Swedish. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 12(3-4), 219-246. Leonard, L. B., Sabbadini, L., Leonard, J. S., & Volterra, V. (1987). Specific language impairment in children: a cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 32(2), 233-252. Lerdahl, F. (2001). Tonal pitch space. New York: Oxford University Press. Liegeois-Chauvel, C., Giraud, K., Badier, J. M., Marquis, P., & Chauvel, P. (2001). Intracerebral evoked potentials in pitch perception reveal a functional asymmetry of the human auditory cortex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930, 117-132. Liegeois-Chauvel, C., Peretz, I., Babai, M., Laguitton, V., & Chauvel, P. (1998). Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing. Brain, 121 ( Pt 10), 1853-1867. Locke, J. L. (1997). A theory of neurolinguistic development. Brain and Language, 58(2), 265-326. Lomax, A. (1968). Folk song style and culture. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Steedman, M. J. (1971). On interpreting Bach. Machine Intelligence, 6, 221–241. Lotze, M., Scheler, G., Tan, H. R., Braun, C., & Birbaumer, N. (2003). The musician's brain: functional imaging of amateurs and professionals during performance and imagery. Neuroimage, 20(3), 1817-1829. Lynch, M. P., & Eilers, R. E. (1992). A study of perceptual development for musical tuning. Perception and Psychophysics, 52(6), 599-608. Lynch, M. P., Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K., & Urbano, R. C. (1990). Innateness, experience, and music perception. Psychological Science, 1(4), 272-276. Lynch, M. P., Eilers, R. E., Oller, K. D., Urbano, R. C., & Wilson, P. (1991). Influences of acculturation and musical sophistication on perception of musical interval patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(4), 967-975. Lynn, R., Graham Wilson, R., & Gault, A. (1989). Simple musical tests as measures of spearman's g. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(1), 25-28. Madsen, C. K. (1979). Modulated Beat Discrimination among Musicians and Nonmusicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27(2), 57-67. Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: an MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4(5), 540-545. Magne, C., Schön, D., & Besson, M. (2003). Prosodic and melodic processing in adults and children. Behavioral and electrophysiologic approaches. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 461-476.
References 194 Magne, C., Schön, D., & Besson, M. (2006). Musician children detect pitch violations in both music and language better than nonmusician children: behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 199- 211. Maillart, C., & Schelstraete, M.-A. (2002). Morphosyntactic Problems in Children with Specific Language Impairment: Grammatical SLI or Overload in Working Memory? In F. Windsor, L. Kelly & N. Hewlett (Eds.), Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics (pp. 85-97). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Makeig, S., Jung, T. P., Bell, A. J., Ghahremani, D., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94(20), 10979-10984. Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T. P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., et al. (2002). Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science, 295(5555), 690-694. Mandler, J. M. (2000). Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 3-36. Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21(2), 339-366. Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule Learning by Seven-Month-Old Infants. Science, 283(5398), 77-80. Marinellie, S. A. (2004). Complex syntax used by school-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) in child-adult conversation. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(6), 517-533. Markman, E. M. (1994). Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisition. Lingua, 92(1), 199-227. Masataka, N. (1999). Preference for infant-directed singing in 2-day-old hearing infants of deaf parents. Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 1001-1005. Mattys, S. L., Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants. Cognitive Psychology, 38(4), 465-494. Mayberry, R. I., & Lock, E. (2003). Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis. Brain and Language, 87(3), 369-384. Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82(3), B101-111. McArthur, G. M., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2001). Auditory perceptual processing in people with reading and oral language impairments: current issues and recommendations. Dyslexia, 7(3), 150-170. McArthur, G. M., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2004). Frequency discrimination deficits in people with specific language impairment: reliability, validity, and linguistic correlates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(3), 527-541. McDermott, J., & Hauser, M. D. (2005). The Origins of Music: Innateness, Uniqueness, and Evolution. Music Perception, 23(1), 29-59. McKenzie, A. L., Nagarajan, S. S., Roberts, T. P., Merzenich, M. M., & Byl, N. N. (2003). Somatosensory representation of the digits and clinical performance in patients with focal hand dystonia. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(10), 737-749.
Page 1 and 2:
Sebastian Jentschke: Neural Correla
Page 3 and 4:
Gutachter der Arbeit Prof. Dr. Ange
Page 6 and 7:
Table of contents 1 Introduction 1
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTS IX 7 Electroencep
Page 10:
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI Abbreviations
Page 13 and 14:
Zusammenfassung der wissenschaftlic
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 20 and 21:
1 Introduction Language and music a
Page 22 and 23:
2 Music Perception Music is one of
Page 24 and 25:
Music Perception 5 to her infant re
Page 26 and 27:
Music Perception 7 chronize movemen
Page 28 and 29:
Music Perception 9 at 5 years of ag
Page 30 and 31:
Music Perception 11 keys related by
Page 32 and 33:
Music Perception 13 Krumhansl and S
Page 34 and 35:
Music Perception 15 tion. The proce
Page 36 and 37:
Music Perception 17 MMN paradigms m
Page 38 and 39:
Music Perception 19 In a study, emp
Page 40 and 41:
Music Perception 21 2001a). Janata
Page 42 and 43:
3 Musical Training Performing a pie
Page 44 and 45:
Musical Training 25 Deliberate prac
Page 46 and 47:
Musical Training 27 them to transfe
Page 48 and 49:
Musical Training 29 can be found ev
Page 50 and 51:
Musical Training 31 dition (and onl
Page 52 and 53:
Musical Training 33 without substan
Page 54 and 55:
Musical Training 35 such studies sh
Page 56:
Musical Training 37 with regard to
Page 59 and 60:
Music and Language 40 Brown (2000)
Page 61 and 62:
Music and Language 42 ture (for a r
Page 63 and 64:
Music and Language 44 Neural constr
Page 65 and 66:
Music and Language 46 pitch registe
Page 67 and 68:
Music and Language 48 functions. Th
Page 69 and 70:
Music and Language 50 found from ve
Page 71 and 72:
Language Perception 52 cross-langua
Page 73 and 74:
Language Perception 54 ing that a w
Page 75 and 76:
Language Perception 56 Perceptual g
Page 77 and 78:
Language Perception 58 Social const
Page 79 and 80:
Language Perception 60 Syntax After
Page 81 and 82:
Language Perception 62 2002; Newpor
Page 83 and 84:
Language Perception 64 Complex synt
Page 85 and 86:
Language Perception 66 which these
Page 87 and 88:
Language Perception 68 interaction
Page 89 and 90:
Language Perception 70 only disrupt
Page 91 and 92:
Language Perception 72 tic structur
Page 93 and 94:
Specific Language Impairment 74 ind
Page 95 and 96:
Specific Language Impairment 76 6.2
Page 97 and 98:
Specific Language Impairment 78 6.3
Page 99 and 100:
Specific Language Impairment 80 (Be
Page 101 and 102:
Specific Language Impairment 82 ply
Page 103 and 104:
Specific Language Impairment 84 mis
Page 105 and 106:
Specific Language Impairment 86 the
Page 107 and 108:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 109 and 110:
Electroencephalography and Event-Re
Page 112:
8 Experiments I - IV: Introduction
Page 115 and 116:
Experiment I 96 parents. 13 All chi
Page 117 and 118:
Experiment I 98 patterns in short-t
Page 119 and 120:
Experiment I 100 -1.02 μV, SEM =0.
Page 121 and 122:
Experiment I 102 EAD Figure 9-3 Gra
Page 123 and 124:
Experiment I 104 amplitude size of
Page 126 and 127:
10 Experiment II: Neural correlates
Page 128 and 129:
Experiment II 109 Stimuli and parad
Page 130 and 131:
Experiment II 111 tion of objects;
Page 132 and 133:
Experiment II 113 amplitude in the
Page 134 and 135:
Experiment II 115 as compared to no
Page 136 and 137:
Experiment II 117 negative) amplitu
Page 138 and 139:
Experiment II 119 expectancy of a r
Page 140 and 141:
Experiment II 121 physical judgemen
Page 142 and 143:
11 Experiment III: Neural correlate
Page 144 and 145:
Experiment III 125 periment IV - wh
Page 146 and 147:
Experiment III 127 cational backgro
Page 148 and 149:
Experiment III 129 due to a differe
Page 150 and 151:
Experiment III 131 scalp sites. Pla
Page 152 and 153:
Experiment III 133 of syntactic reg
Page 154 and 155:
Experiment III 135 Even though desc
Page 156:
Experiment III 137 ion than in the
Page 159 and 160:
Experiment IV 140 cluded), [2] they
Page 161 and 162: Experiment IV 142 12.3 Results Coho
Page 163 and 164: Experiment IV 144 Figure 12-3 summa
Page 165 and 166: Experiment IV 146 p < 0.001). In th
Page 167 and 168: Experiment IV 148 tion cross vs. si
Page 169 and 170: Experiment IV 150 anterior: F(1,39)
Page 171 and 172: Experiment IV 152 An N5 usually fol
Page 174 and 175: 13 Experiment I - IV: Development o
Page 176: Development of the Neural Correlate
Page 179 and 180: General Discussion 160 and Leonard,
Page 181 and 182: General Discussion 162 sent in the
Page 183 and 184: General Discussion 164 economic sta
Page 185 and 186: General Discussion 166 Friederici,
Page 187 and 188: General Discussion 168 year old chi
Page 190 and 191: Lists of figures and tables Figure
Page 192 and 193: References Abney, S. P. (1989). A c
Page 194 and 195: References 175 Bharucha, J. J., & S
Page 196 and 197: References 177 Brattico, E., Tervan
Page 198 and 199: References 179 Creel, S. C., Newpor
Page 200 and 201: References 181 Farrell, M. M., & Ph
Page 202 and 203: References 183 Friedrich, M., & Fri
Page 204 and 205: References 185 logie. Themenbereich
Page 206 and 207: References 187 Hoff, E., & Tian, C.
Page 208 and 209: References 189 Jones, M. R. (1982).
Page 210 and 211: References 191 Koelsch, S., & Siebe
Page 214 and 215: References 195 McMullen, E., & Saff
Page 216 and 217: References 197 Nobre, A. C., Coull,
Page 218 and 219: References 199 Peretz, I. (1990). P
Page 220 and 221: References 201 Roederer, J. (1984).
Page 222 and 223: References 203 Schöler, H. (2004).
Page 224 and 225: References 205 Sluming, V., Brooks,
Page 226 and 227: References 207 Thompson, W. F., Sch
Page 228 and 229: References 209 Trehub, S. E. (2003c
Page 230: References 211 Weinert, S. (1991).
Page 233 and 234: Appendix A-2 014 incorrect Das Nilp
Page 235 and 236: Appendix A-4 044 correct Der Rasen
Page 237 and 238: Appendix A-6 073 incorrect Die Medi
Page 240 and 241: Curriculum vitae Sebastian Jentschk
Page 242: Selbstständigkeitserklärung Hierm
Page 246 and 247: MPI Series in Human Cognitive and B
Page 248 and 249: 32 André J. Szameitat Die Funktion
Page 250 and 251: 63 Ann Pannekamp Prosodische Inform
Page 252: 96 Marcel Braß Das inferior fronta
show all

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?