07.12.2012 Views

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 Experiments I – IV: Introduction<br />

The present work <strong>in</strong>vestigated the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> musical <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntax with four<br />

experiments <strong>in</strong> children <strong>of</strong> different age groups (2½, 5, 9, <strong>and</strong> 11 years old). Further, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluences <strong>of</strong> language impairment <strong>and</strong> musical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g on these processes were exam<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Experiment I evaluated the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> musical syntax <strong>in</strong> 2½-year old children. It<br />

was set out to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether neural correlates <strong>of</strong> music syntactic process<strong>in</strong>g can be<br />

already observed <strong>in</strong> children <strong>of</strong> this age.<br />

Experiment II compared the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> musical syntax <strong>in</strong> 5-year old children<br />

which either had typical language development or specific language impairment (SLI).<br />

As children with SLI have clear deficiencies <strong>in</strong> their process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntax it<br />

should be <strong>in</strong>vestigated if comparable deficiencies could be observed <strong>in</strong> their process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> musical syntax.<br />

Experiment III <strong>in</strong>vestigated the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> musical <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntax <strong>in</strong> 9-year<br />

old children. These children were either musically tra<strong>in</strong>ed or not. An earlier study <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> musical syntax <strong>in</strong> adult musicians (Koelsch, Schmidt et al.,<br />

2002) found an enlarged bra<strong>in</strong> response to a violation <strong>of</strong> musical syntax. The first objective<br />

<strong>of</strong> this experiment was to determ<strong>in</strong>e if a comparable enlargement could be observed<br />

<strong>in</strong> children with musical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Moreover, there is mount<strong>in</strong>g evidence for a considerable<br />

overlap <strong>in</strong> the neural resources that are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> musical <strong>and</strong><br />

l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntax (see chapter “<strong>Music</strong> <strong>and</strong> Language”). Thus, another objective <strong>of</strong> Experiment<br />

III was to <strong>in</strong>vestigate if this overlap <strong>in</strong> the neural resources can lead to transfer<br />

effects from music- to l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntactic process<strong>in</strong>g, i.e. to an enlarged bra<strong>in</strong> response<br />

when process<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntax <strong>in</strong> musically tra<strong>in</strong>ed children.<br />

Experiment IV <strong>in</strong>vestigated similar issues as Experiment III <strong>in</strong> an older group <strong>of</strong> 11year<br />

old children which were either musically tra<strong>in</strong>ed or non-musically tra<strong>in</strong>ed. The<br />

same experimental paradigm was employed to <strong>in</strong>vestigate how a higher amount <strong>of</strong> musical<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluences the neural correlates <strong>of</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g musical <strong>and</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntax.<br />

It was expected that an enlarged bra<strong>in</strong> response to both a violation <strong>of</strong> musical <strong>and</strong><br />

l<strong>in</strong>guistic syntax will be found <strong>in</strong> children with musical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!