Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
Neural Correlates of Processing Syntax in Music and ... - PubMan
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Music</strong> Perception 7<br />
chronize movements. Vice versa, movements <strong>in</strong>fluence the auditory encod<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> rhythm<br />
(Phillips-Silver & Tra<strong>in</strong>or, 2005), illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the strong multisensory connection between<br />
body movement <strong>and</strong> auditory rhythm process<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The segmentation <strong>of</strong> musical phrases <strong>in</strong>volves the use <strong>of</strong> acoustic <strong>and</strong> structural cues.<br />
Acoustic cues as changes <strong>in</strong> pitch height (mostly fall<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>and</strong> tone duration (mostly<br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g) are critical markers for boundaries. Even 4½-month old <strong>in</strong>fants prefer<br />
pauses at phrase boundaries (Jusczyk & Krumhansl, 1993). Later, at 8 months, rhythmical<br />
cues were also found to contribute to phrase segmentation, i.e., <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the duration<br />
<strong>of</strong> a element with<strong>in</strong> a isosynchronous sequence results <strong>in</strong> segmentation, whereas an<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity did not (<strong>in</strong> both, adults <strong>and</strong> children, Tra<strong>in</strong>or & Adams, 2000).<br />
Structural cues, such as syntactic regularities, may contribute to the segmentation <strong>of</strong><br />
phrases (e.g., a dom<strong>in</strong>ant-tonic progression usually marks the end <strong>of</strong> a musical phrase).<br />
Vice versa, the acquisition <strong>of</strong> these regularities may presuppose basic group<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms<br />
for pars<strong>in</strong>g a sequence <strong>of</strong> melody notes.<br />
A critical feature <strong>of</strong> music – central to the scope <strong>of</strong> this work – is that musical events<br />
fulfil different structural functions beyond the immediate sound<strong>in</strong>g qualities. How<br />
these structural functions are patterned through time def<strong>in</strong>es more abstract <strong>and</strong> complex<br />
dynamic organization. This aga<strong>in</strong>, may give rise to experienc<strong>in</strong>g particular emotional<br />
qualities. Saffran, Loman, <strong>and</strong> Robertson (2000) demonstrated that 7-month old <strong>in</strong>fants<br />
reta<strong>in</strong>ed music with which they were familiarized over 2 weeks (but only if the passage<br />
appeared <strong>in</strong> the musical context <strong>in</strong> which it was learned). This suggests that <strong>in</strong>fants are<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g sophisticated representations <strong>of</strong> music <strong>and</strong> that they learn <strong>and</strong> remember<br />
structured <strong>in</strong>formation. Such structural regularities may be acquired by statistical<br />
learn<strong>in</strong>g mechanisms (Tillmann, Bharucha, & Big<strong>and</strong>, 2000). Dowl<strong>in</strong>g (1988) proposed<br />
that the repetitiveness <strong>and</strong> the simplicity <strong>of</strong> lullabies may help children to acquire<br />
musical structure. Likewise, musical tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g may accelerate this sensitivity to musical<br />
relations (Dowl<strong>in</strong>g, 1999).<br />
Prerequisite to the acquisition <strong>of</strong> these regularities is a reference system. <strong>Music</strong>al scales<br />
have a specific <strong>in</strong>terval structure (<strong>of</strong>ten consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> unequal <strong>in</strong>terval steps) that is typical<br />
for the music <strong>of</strong> the culture <strong>in</strong> which children grow up. This <strong>in</strong>terval structure must<br />
be acquired by children which takes place with<strong>in</strong> the first year <strong>of</strong> life (Lynch & Eilers,<br />
1992). As for language-specific phonemic contrasts (Cheour et al., 1998), <strong>in</strong>fants are<br />
<strong>in</strong>itially sensitive to musical scales from different cultures (Lynch, Eilers, Oller, Urbano,<br />
& Wilson, 1991). Likewise, Trehub et al. (1999) demonstrated that <strong>in</strong>fants are<br />
able to detect perturbations to both diatonic <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar unequal <strong>in</strong>terval scales<br />
whereas adults only detected changes to melodies from a diatonic scale. Infants are able<br />
to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate changes smaller than a semitone before they <strong>in</strong>ternalize the scale struc-