ConflictBarometer_2015
ConflictBarometer_2015
ConflictBarometer_2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GLOBAL CONFLICT PANORAMA<br />
ANALYSIS INTRASTATE - INTERSTATE - SUBSTATE<br />
According to the HIIK Methodology, an interstate conflict is<br />
conducted between two or more states whereas intrastate<br />
conflicts are conducted between non-state actors and national<br />
governments. Substate conflicts comprise only nonstate<br />
actors. In <strong>2015</strong>, the HIIK counted 74 interstate conflicts,<br />
of which ten were fought on a violent level. In contrast,<br />
61 percent of all intrastate conflicts (172/280) and 75<br />
percent of all substate conflicts (41/55) were violent. The<br />
HIIK ob-served four new interstate conflicts and three new<br />
intrastate conflicts in <strong>2015</strong>.<br />
In Europe, only one of the 17 interstate conflicts was<br />
fought with violent means. The violent crisis between<br />
Armenia and Azerbaijan over the break-away region<br />
Nagorno-Karabakh, internationally recognized as belonging<br />
to Azerbaijan but mostly populated by ethnic Armenians,<br />
continued. 30 percent of all European intrastate conflicts<br />
(13/43) were conducted on a violent level, with the sole<br />
highly violent conflict being observed in Ukraine's Donbas<br />
region. The only two substate conflicts continued between<br />
right-wing and left-wing mili-tants in Greece and between<br />
right-wing militants and ethnic minorities in Hungary.<br />
In Sub-Saharan Africa, eight interstate conflicts were observed,<br />
of which only the violent crisis between Sudan and<br />
South Sudan was conducted on a violent level. In comparision,<br />
49 of the 75 intrastate conflicts and eleven of the<br />
14 substate conflicts were fought violently.<br />
The Americas saw 16 cases of interstate conflict. The violent<br />
crisis over border security between the USA and Mexico was<br />
the only violent interstate conflict in the region. 85 percent<br />
of the 34 intrastate conflicts (29/34) and all three substate<br />
conflicts reached a violent level.<br />
In Asia and Oceania, three of the 21 interstate conflicts<br />
saw the use of violence, while more than 60 percent<br />
(50/80) of all intrastate conflicts and 64 percent (16/25) of<br />
all substate conflicts were fought violently.<br />
The Middle East and Maghreb saw the highest share of<br />
vio-lent interstate conflicts (4/12), with three violent crises<br />
taking place in the context of the Syrian civil war. Of these,<br />
a new conflict emerged between Turkey and Russia after the<br />
down-ing of a Russian fighter jet by Turkish aircraft. 65<br />
percent of all intrastate conflicts (31/48) and all ten substate<br />
conflicts were violent. The limited war between different<br />
tribes constituted the only highly violent substate conflict in<br />
the region. (jli)<br />
DYNAMICS WITHIN INDIVIDUAL CONFLICTS<br />
Of the 402 conflicts that continued in <strong>2015</strong>, 124 witnessed a<br />
change in intensity. A total of 59 conflicts escalated and 65<br />
de-escalated. Additionally, seven new conflicts were<br />
registered in <strong>2015</strong>, of which four reached the level of a<br />
violent crisis [→ Republic of Congo (opposition); Nicaragua<br />
(indigenous groups); Russia Turkey; Serbia (Kosovo –<br />
opposition)].<br />
One conflict over subnational predominance and resources<br />
in Myanmar escalated by three levels from a dispute to a<br />
limited war [→ Myanmar (MNDAA / Shan State)].<br />
Seven conflicts escalated by two levels. For instance, Asia<br />
and Oceania, the Maldives, Myanmar, and Nepal saw an escalation<br />
of disputes with the opposition to violent crises [→<br />
Maldives (opposition); Myanmar (opposition); Nepal (opposition)].<br />
In the region of the Middle East and Maghreb, the<br />
2014 violent crisis over autonomy between the PKK and the<br />
Turkish government escalated to a war [→ Turkey (PKK)]. In<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa, a conflict over national power in Sierra<br />
Leone escalated from the level of a dispute to a violent crisis<br />
[→ Sierra Leone (APC - SLPP)].<br />
In 13 cases, former violent crises de-escalated to disputes. In<br />
Europe, the conflict over autonomy and the orientation of the<br />
political system between the Serbian minority and the<br />
Kosovar government de-escalated to a dispute [→ Serbia<br />
(Serbian minority – Kosovar government)]. Two examples for<br />
the same dynamic in the Americas and in Sub-Saharan Africa,<br />
respectively, constituted the conflict over autonomy and<br />
resources in Brazil and the dispute between Christians and<br />
Muslims in Nigeria [→ Brazil (indigenous groups); Nigeria<br />
(Christians – Muslims)]. In Asia and Oceania, four violent<br />
crises de-escalated to dispute level, such as the opposition<br />
conflict in Thailand [→ Thailand (opposition)]. Five conflicts<br />
with the same intensity change could be observed in the<br />
Middle East and Maghreb.<br />
The war over secession, the orientation of the political<br />
system, and resources between Hamas and the Israeli<br />
government de-escalated by two levels to a violent crisis [→<br />
Israel (Hamas et al. / Palestinian Territories)]. (psc)<br />
15