26.02.2016 Views

ConflictBarometer_2015

ConflictBarometer_2015

ConflictBarometer_2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GLOBAL CONFLICT PANORAMA<br />

ANALYSIS INTRASTATE - INTERSTATE - SUBSTATE<br />

According to the HIIK Methodology, an interstate conflict is<br />

conducted between two or more states whereas intrastate<br />

conflicts are conducted between non-state actors and national<br />

governments. Substate conflicts comprise only nonstate<br />

actors. In <strong>2015</strong>, the HIIK counted 74 interstate conflicts,<br />

of which ten were fought on a violent level. In contrast,<br />

61 percent of all intrastate conflicts (172/280) and 75<br />

percent of all substate conflicts (41/55) were violent. The<br />

HIIK ob-served four new interstate conflicts and three new<br />

intrastate conflicts in <strong>2015</strong>.<br />

In Europe, only one of the 17 interstate conflicts was<br />

fought with violent means. The violent crisis between<br />

Armenia and Azerbaijan over the break-away region<br />

Nagorno-Karabakh, internationally recognized as belonging<br />

to Azerbaijan but mostly populated by ethnic Armenians,<br />

continued. 30 percent of all European intrastate conflicts<br />

(13/43) were conducted on a violent level, with the sole<br />

highly violent conflict being observed in Ukraine's Donbas<br />

region. The only two substate conflicts continued between<br />

right-wing and left-wing mili-tants in Greece and between<br />

right-wing militants and ethnic minorities in Hungary.<br />

In Sub-Saharan Africa, eight interstate conflicts were observed,<br />

of which only the violent crisis between Sudan and<br />

South Sudan was conducted on a violent level. In comparision,<br />

49 of the 75 intrastate conflicts and eleven of the<br />

14 substate conflicts were fought violently.<br />

The Americas saw 16 cases of interstate conflict. The violent<br />

crisis over border security between the USA and Mexico was<br />

the only violent interstate conflict in the region. 85 percent<br />

of the 34 intrastate conflicts (29/34) and all three substate<br />

conflicts reached a violent level.<br />

In Asia and Oceania, three of the 21 interstate conflicts<br />

saw the use of violence, while more than 60 percent<br />

(50/80) of all intrastate conflicts and 64 percent (16/25) of<br />

all substate conflicts were fought violently.<br />

The Middle East and Maghreb saw the highest share of<br />

vio-lent interstate conflicts (4/12), with three violent crises<br />

taking place in the context of the Syrian civil war. Of these,<br />

a new conflict emerged between Turkey and Russia after the<br />

down-ing of a Russian fighter jet by Turkish aircraft. 65<br />

percent of all intrastate conflicts (31/48) and all ten substate<br />

conflicts were violent. The limited war between different<br />

tribes constituted the only highly violent substate conflict in<br />

the region. (jli)<br />

DYNAMICS WITHIN INDIVIDUAL CONFLICTS<br />

Of the 402 conflicts that continued in <strong>2015</strong>, 124 witnessed a<br />

change in intensity. A total of 59 conflicts escalated and 65<br />

de-escalated. Additionally, seven new conflicts were<br />

registered in <strong>2015</strong>, of which four reached the level of a<br />

violent crisis [→ Republic of Congo (opposition); Nicaragua<br />

(indigenous groups); Russia Turkey; Serbia (Kosovo –<br />

opposition)].<br />

One conflict over subnational predominance and resources<br />

in Myanmar escalated by three levels from a dispute to a<br />

limited war [→ Myanmar (MNDAA / Shan State)].<br />

Seven conflicts escalated by two levels. For instance, Asia<br />

and Oceania, the Maldives, Myanmar, and Nepal saw an escalation<br />

of disputes with the opposition to violent crises [→<br />

Maldives (opposition); Myanmar (opposition); Nepal (opposition)].<br />

In the region of the Middle East and Maghreb, the<br />

2014 violent crisis over autonomy between the PKK and the<br />

Turkish government escalated to a war [→ Turkey (PKK)]. In<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa, a conflict over national power in Sierra<br />

Leone escalated from the level of a dispute to a violent crisis<br />

[→ Sierra Leone (APC - SLPP)].<br />

In 13 cases, former violent crises de-escalated to disputes. In<br />

Europe, the conflict over autonomy and the orientation of the<br />

political system between the Serbian minority and the<br />

Kosovar government de-escalated to a dispute [→ Serbia<br />

(Serbian minority – Kosovar government)]. Two examples for<br />

the same dynamic in the Americas and in Sub-Saharan Africa,<br />

respectively, constituted the conflict over autonomy and<br />

resources in Brazil and the dispute between Christians and<br />

Muslims in Nigeria [→ Brazil (indigenous groups); Nigeria<br />

(Christians – Muslims)]. In Asia and Oceania, four violent<br />

crises de-escalated to dispute level, such as the opposition<br />

conflict in Thailand [→ Thailand (opposition)]. Five conflicts<br />

with the same intensity change could be observed in the<br />

Middle East and Maghreb.<br />

The war over secession, the orientation of the political<br />

system, and resources between Hamas and the Israeli<br />

government de-escalated by two levels to a violent crisis [→<br />

Israel (Hamas et al. / Palestinian Territories)]. (psc)<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!