09.12.2012 Views

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in the transition periods in spring <strong>and</strong> late autumn. The average contents were (c9t11-<br />

18:2) 0.76%, (trans-C18:1) 3.67%, (trans-C18:2) 1.12%, <strong>and</strong> (total trans fatty acids)<br />

4.92%. High correlation coefficients (r) were reported between the content of the<br />

CLA isomer c9t11-18:2 <strong>and</strong> the contents of trans-C18:1, trans-C18:2, total trans<br />

fatty acids, <strong>and</strong> C18:3 of 0.97, 0.91, 0.97, <strong>and</strong> 0.89, respectively. A probable metabolic<br />

pathway in the biohydrogenation of linolenic acid was also reported: c9c12c15<br />

→ c9t11c15 → t11c15 → t11 [65].<br />

3. Equivalent Chain Length<br />

It is difficult to identify peaks in gas chromatograms, mainly because of the complexity<br />

of the fatty acid composition of hydrogenated vegetable <strong>and</strong> fish oils. Some<br />

of the problems of using capillary GC for qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative analysis of<br />

hydrogenated oils have been reviewed [56]. The major identification problem is a<br />

result of the large number of fatty acid isomers present. One difficulty in identifying<br />

peaks is due to the fact that some polyunsaturated fatty acids can have longer retention<br />

times than the next longer chain fatty acid. This happens most frequently on<br />

highly polar columns used to separate fatty acid isomers.<br />

One way to predict where a certain fatty acid will elute on a GC column is<br />

based on the so-called equivalent chain length (ECL). The use of ECL to identify<br />

fatty acid isomers on GC columns has been reviewed [56,66]. It was reported that<br />

ECLs are constants for a specific carrier gas <strong>and</strong> column <strong>and</strong> are independent of<br />

experimental conditions [67]. A specific fatty acid can be characterized by obtaining<br />

its ECL on both polar <strong>and</strong> nonpolar columns. The ECL consists of one or two integers<br />

indicating the positional chain length, <strong>and</strong> two numbers after the decimal that indicate<br />

the fractional chain length (FCL). The ECL values for fatty acids on a specific<br />

column are determined by first using semilog paper to plot the log of the retention<br />

times (y axis) against those of the saturated fatty acids (e.g., 16:0 = 16.00, 18:0 =<br />

18.00, 20:0 = 20.00) on the x axis observed under isothermal conditions. Using the<br />

same column, the retention time (y-axis value) of an unsaturated fatty acid is then<br />

plotted to find its ELC on the x axis. For example, the ECL of linoleic acid (18:2n-<br />

6) was found to be 18.65. The FCL value was 0.65 (18.65 � 18.00). Using these<br />

data, the ECL for 20:2n-6 was predicted to be 20.65 (20.00 � 0.65). The actual ECL<br />

of 20:2n-6 was experimentally determined to be 20.64 [36]. Equivalent chain length<br />

data from a GC analysis of rapeseed oil showed that the cis-11 20:1 fatty acid<br />

coelutes with trans triene isomers at oven temperatures above 160�C [68].<br />

4. Relative Response Factors<br />

Area normalization is often used to report the relative concentration of fatty acid<br />

isomers in an oil mixture. This method is accurate only if all isomers exhibit the<br />

same response in the GC detector. However, all the fatty acid isomers do not give<br />

the same relative response in the GC flame ionization detector. Relative response<br />

factors, first proposed in 1964 [69], were found to depend on the weight percent of<br />

all carbons except the carbonyl carbon in the fatty acid chain. A later study confirmed<br />

these findings <strong>and</strong> concluded that the required corrections were not insignificant,<br />

even though they were often not used [70]. Failure to use a correction factor could<br />

result in an error of about 6% (relative to 18:0) in the case of 22:6. Table 2 summarizes<br />

some of the correction factors recommended.<br />

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!