09.12.2012 Views

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

long chain fatty acids with a cis double bond in the C-9 position (see below) (116).<br />

Other lipases that show some preference for specific fatty acids are those from C.<br />

rugosa (C18:1 cis-9), strains of A. niger (C10 <strong>and</strong> C12 or C18:1 cis-9), M. miehei<br />

(C12), Rhizopus arrhizus (C8, C10) (115), Humicola lanuginosa #3 (117), <strong>and</strong> human<br />

gastric lipase (C8 <strong>and</strong> C10) (118). A lipase from Penicillium camembertii hydrolyzes<br />

only mono- <strong>and</strong> diacylglycerols (119).<br />

Negative selectivity has been observed where the lipase from C. cylindracea<br />

(rugosa) selected against triacylglycerol molecules containing DHA (120); G. c<strong>and</strong>idum<br />

lipase preparations have shown similar discrimination for �-linolenate in<br />

borage oil (121), <strong>and</strong> erucic acid from rapeseed oil (122).<br />

Lipase selectivity/specificity may be due to structural features of the substrate<br />

(e.g., fatty acid chain length, unsaturation, stereochemistry), physicochemical factors<br />

at the interface, <strong>and</strong>/or differences in the binding sites of the enzyme. Stereoselectivity<br />

of enzymes can be influenced by temperature <strong>and</strong> hydrophobicity of the solvent.<br />

Recently, Rogalska et al. (123) showed that the enantioselectivity of lipases<br />

from R. miehei, C. antarctica B, lipoprotein lipase, <strong>and</strong> human gastric lipase toward<br />

monolayers of racemic dicaprin was enhanced at low surface pressures, while catalytic<br />

activity decreased.<br />

Variations in specificity of lipase preparations from different fungi, different<br />

strains of the same species, <strong>and</strong> the same strain cultured under different conditions<br />

may be due to the production of multiple isoforms with differing specificities (124).<br />

The lipase(s) of G. c<strong>and</strong>idum have been of particular interest because those from<br />

some strains exhibit a relatively high preference for ester bonds involving fatty acids<br />

with a cis-9 double bond (e.g., oleic acid). Geotrichum species <strong>and</strong> strains produce<br />

at least two glycosylated lipases, most often designated lipase I <strong>and</strong> II, or less often<br />

A or B, which are coded for by two genes (13,14,96,125). Additional isoforms may<br />

be produced that differ by degrees of glycosylation. There are conflicting reports on<br />

the specificities of the two lipases. For example, of the two lipases produced by G.<br />

c<strong>and</strong>idum CMICC 335426, lipase B showed high showed high specificity for the<br />

cis-9 unsaturates whereas lipase A of this strain <strong>and</strong>, according to Sidebottom et al.<br />

(15), lipases I <strong>and</strong> II of ATCC 34614, showed no preference. Bertolini et al. (125)<br />

recently cloned lipases I <strong>and</strong> II from G. c<strong>and</strong>idum ATCC 34614 into Saccharomyces<br />

cerevisiae, then isolated <strong>and</strong> purified the two lipases from this yeast <strong>and</strong> determined<br />

their substrate specificities. Lipase I showed higher specificity than lipase II for long<br />

chain unsaturated fatty acyl chains with cis-9 double bond, <strong>and</strong> lipase II showed a<br />

preference for substrates having short acyl chains (C 8 to C 14). These investigators<br />

also showed that sequence variation in the N-terminal amino acids of these lipases,<br />

or the lid, does not contribute to variation in substrate preference. Not all strains of<br />

G. c<strong>and</strong>idum exhibit the preference for unsaturated fatty acids (11). The specificities<br />

of isoforms of lipases from Geotrichum are shown in Table 3 (15,126–129).<br />

Cygler et al. (105) suggested that the basis for the selectivity differences between<br />

lipases I <strong>and</strong> II from G. c<strong>and</strong>idum involves key amino acid residues along the<br />

internal cavity presumed to be the binding site of the scissile acyl chain <strong>and</strong> that<br />

selectivity does not involve the lid. Studies with a cloned lipase from R. delemar<br />

(130) appear to support this suggestion. For example, substitution of certain amino<br />

acids (e.g., Phe 95 → Asp) through site-directed mutagenesis in the substrate-binding<br />

region resulted in an almost twofold increase in the preference for tricaprylin relative<br />

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!