09.12.2012 Views

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

Food Lipids: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Biotechnology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. Agricultural Products<br />

The extended metabolism of 18-carbon PUFAs to longer chain, more unsaturated<br />

fatty acids [frequently referred to as highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFAs)] in<br />

animals means that even though animals <strong>and</strong> plants may contribute similar families<br />

of PUFAs to the diet, the precise form of these fatty acids will differ. As a result,<br />

an important consequence of consuming animal in contrast to vegetarian foods is<br />

that in the latter, linoleic <strong>and</strong> linolenic acids are the fatty acids ingested from the n-<br />

6 <strong>and</strong> n-3 families, whereas in animal foods, their metabolic products, preformed<br />

arachidonic, eicosapentaenoic, <strong>and</strong> DHA, are also ingested. It is now clear that these<br />

are significant nutritional, biochemical, <strong>and</strong> physiological differences.<br />

Furthermore, whereas animal sources of fat are often grouped as similar, avian,<br />

aquatic, <strong>and</strong> ruminant or nonruminant mammalian storage lipids are very different<br />

in the quantity of depot triacylglycerols, their distribution <strong>and</strong> their fatty acids, as<br />

well as their composition <strong>and</strong> arrangement on the glycerol. The final content of fatty<br />

acids in storage triacylglycerols is the result of diet, metabolism, <strong>and</strong> de novo synthesis.<br />

In this respect, each of the major animal fat sources differs in important ways,<br />

which tends to distinguish each as a fat-rich commodity. These differences have<br />

important effects on the texture, flavor, <strong>and</strong> caloric density of the muscles as consumed<br />

directly [79–81] <strong>and</strong> also on processed foods prepared from them [82].<br />

Although the differences among species in the quantity <strong>and</strong> distribution of fat<br />

are associated with the particular commodities, they are not necessarily all innate to<br />

them. These differences also reflect the historical development of the particular muscle<br />

food as a commodity. Even among ruminants, the fat content of modern beef<br />

muscle is higher <strong>and</strong> more saturated than that of comparable wild ruminant muscle<br />

[83]. Breeding <strong>and</strong> feeding practices allow for the production of meat at a specific<br />

fat concentration [84]. If different properties were perceived to be beneficial, the fat<br />

content could arguably be altered to various extents accordingly. Thus, when examining<br />

the content of storage fat in muscle tissue that is used as food, one is looking<br />

at a rather narrow window of a wide range of possibilities. As commodity needs<br />

become more defined <strong>and</strong> the fat functionality better understood, the means to arrive<br />

at these targets will need to be explored.<br />

In addition to the differences in total quantity of fat <strong>and</strong> its tissue distribution,<br />

the composition of storage triacylglycerols in animal species differs as well. Red<br />

meats tend to be relatively higher in saturated fatty acids <strong>and</strong> lower in PUFAs than<br />

poultry or fish. Poultry <strong>and</strong> fish differ significantly in the chain length of monounsaturated<br />

fatty acids <strong>and</strong> in the content of n-3 PUFAs.<br />

Once again, a consistent observation of the lipid content in different animal<br />

tissues is the variability within species. Even within ruminant animals in which the<br />

dietary PUFAs are largely hydrogenated by rumen flora, there is a significant range<br />

of composition. Among monogastric animals, the variability in fat composition<br />

within species due to muscle type, diet, environment, <strong>and</strong> age is typically greater<br />

than the differences noted among species [81].<br />

An important question becomes, what unique properties of the metabolism of<br />

the three animal types lead to the observed or apparent differences in lipid composition<br />

<strong>and</strong> behavior? In all animals, the storage triacylglycerols both in adipose <strong>and</strong><br />

individual muscle cells can be assembled from both dietary fatty acids <strong>and</strong> fatty<br />

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!