18.12.2012 Views

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 7.3: Outdoor Ambient Air Benzene Concentrations from NATA 1996<br />

NATA Query Setting Utilized<br />

Benzene <strong>VCCEP</strong> <strong>Submission</strong><br />

March 2006<br />

Median<br />

(µg/m 3 )<br />

102<br />

Mean (µg/m 3 )<br />

95 th Percentile<br />

(µg/m 3 )<br />

Nationwide Nationwide 1.21<br />

1.39<br />

2.8<br />

All Urban Counties Urban 1.41 1.57 3.0<br />

All Rural Counties Rural 0.66 0.72 1.2<br />

Texas Harris County 2.1 2.3 3.3<br />

New York New York County 4.8 5.4 9.3<br />

In determining a representative ambient outside air concentration <strong>for</strong> the child and prospective<br />

parents, the NATA database mean values of 1.57 µg/m 3 <strong>for</strong> an urban setting and 0.72 µg/m 3 <strong>for</strong><br />

a rural setting have been selected. The mean concentrations were selected as they are<br />

reasonable estimates of concentrations likely to be contacted over time (EPA, 1989). It should<br />

be noted that the NATA results represent modeled ambient air concentrations from emissions<br />

data collected in 1996 1 and thus may not reflect the potentially significant emission reductions<br />

that have taken effect in the last ten years, including those from: 1) mobile source regulations<br />

which are being phased in over time; 2) many of the air toxics regulations that EPA has issued<br />

<strong>for</strong> major industrial sources; 3) state or industry initiatives; and 4) any facility closures (EPA,<br />

1996). Because of this, the NATA concentrations listed on Table 7.3, may overestimate the<br />

current national averages. For example, Kinney et al. (2002) conducted an air monitoring study<br />

in New York City during 1999 to characterize levels and factors affecting exposure to benzene.<br />

This study reported benzene concentrations 2.8 times lower than the NATA 1996 modeled<br />

mean concentrations <strong>for</strong> New York County.<br />

Although Wallace and more recently, Buckley et al., have concluded that industrial sources of<br />

benzene are not important with regards to personal benzene exposures on a nationwide basis<br />

(Wallace, 2001; Buckley et al. 2005), potential benzene exposures were evaluated <strong>for</strong> those<br />

living in close proximity to the highest industrial benzene emitters in urban and rural locations.<br />

For such residents, the NATA data and that from individual air monitoring stations can be used<br />

to understand the potential differences in benzene exposure a child might receive from outdoor<br />

air if residing in close proximity to an industrial source. For this exposure assessment, the top<br />

five TRI reporting facilities <strong>for</strong> benzene air releases were evaluated. The currently available TRI<br />

release data are <strong>for</strong> reporting year 2003. The TRI was queried to identify the top five urban and<br />

rural benzene air emitters, which are listed on Table 7.4.<br />

1 Since the time of this analysis, the EPA released an updated NATA using the 1999 emissions inventory.<br />

The updated NATA <strong>for</strong> benzene indicated that the predicted 1999 ambient air concentrations of benzene<br />

nationwide and <strong>for</strong> the ‘all urban’ and ‘all rural’ counties were similar to the 1996 modeled estimates.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!