(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 7.3: Outdoor Ambient Air Benzene Concentrations from NATA 1996<br />
NATA Query Setting Utilized<br />
Benzene <strong>VCCEP</strong> <strong>Submission</strong><br />
March 2006<br />
Median<br />
(µg/m 3 )<br />
102<br />
Mean (µg/m 3 )<br />
95 th Percentile<br />
(µg/m 3 )<br />
Nationwide Nationwide 1.21<br />
1.39<br />
2.8<br />
All Urban Counties Urban 1.41 1.57 3.0<br />
All Rural Counties Rural 0.66 0.72 1.2<br />
Texas Harris County 2.1 2.3 3.3<br />
New York New York County 4.8 5.4 9.3<br />
In determining a representative ambient outside air concentration <strong>for</strong> the child and prospective<br />
parents, the NATA database mean values of 1.57 µg/m 3 <strong>for</strong> an urban setting and 0.72 µg/m 3 <strong>for</strong><br />
a rural setting have been selected. The mean concentrations were selected as they are<br />
reasonable estimates of concentrations likely to be contacted over time (EPA, 1989). It should<br />
be noted that the NATA results represent modeled ambient air concentrations from emissions<br />
data collected in 1996 1 and thus may not reflect the potentially significant emission reductions<br />
that have taken effect in the last ten years, including those from: 1) mobile source regulations<br />
which are being phased in over time; 2) many of the air toxics regulations that EPA has issued<br />
<strong>for</strong> major industrial sources; 3) state or industry initiatives; and 4) any facility closures (EPA,<br />
1996). Because of this, the NATA concentrations listed on Table 7.3, may overestimate the<br />
current national averages. For example, Kinney et al. (2002) conducted an air monitoring study<br />
in New York City during 1999 to characterize levels and factors affecting exposure to benzene.<br />
This study reported benzene concentrations 2.8 times lower than the NATA 1996 modeled<br />
mean concentrations <strong>for</strong> New York County.<br />
Although Wallace and more recently, Buckley et al., have concluded that industrial sources of<br />
benzene are not important with regards to personal benzene exposures on a nationwide basis<br />
(Wallace, 2001; Buckley et al. 2005), potential benzene exposures were evaluated <strong>for</strong> those<br />
living in close proximity to the highest industrial benzene emitters in urban and rural locations.<br />
For such residents, the NATA data and that from individual air monitoring stations can be used<br />
to understand the potential differences in benzene exposure a child might receive from outdoor<br />
air if residing in close proximity to an industrial source. For this exposure assessment, the top<br />
five TRI reporting facilities <strong>for</strong> benzene air releases were evaluated. The currently available TRI<br />
release data are <strong>for</strong> reporting year 2003. The TRI was queried to identify the top five urban and<br />
rural benzene air emitters, which are listed on Table 7.4.<br />
1 Since the time of this analysis, the EPA released an updated NATA using the 1999 emissions inventory.<br />
The updated NATA <strong>for</strong> benzene indicated that the predicted 1999 ambient air concentrations of benzene<br />
nationwide and <strong>for</strong> the ‘all urban’ and ‘all rural’ counties were similar to the 1996 modeled estimates.