(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
absorption compared to inhalation, and divided by the standard default human body weight of<br />
70 kg (equivalent oral dose = 1.2 mg/kg/day). The RfD was then derived by dividing the<br />
equivalent oral dose by the overall uncertainty factor of 300 (4×10 -4 mg/kg/day). The UFs are<br />
the same as described <strong>for</strong> the RfC above.<br />
EPA considers the BMC to be an adverse-effect level; there<strong>for</strong>e, the effect-level extrapolation<br />
analogous to the LOAEL-to-NOAEL UF was used. A factor of 3 (vs. 10) was selected, because<br />
the BMD corresponded to an adverse effect that was not very serious. Second, a factor of 10<br />
was used <strong>for</strong> intraspecies differences in response (human variability) as a means of protecting<br />
potentially sensitive human populations. Third, a subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation factor was<br />
applied, because the mean exposure duration <strong>for</strong> the subjects in the principal study was 6.3<br />
years (7 years is the exposure duration used by EPA <strong>for</strong> deriving chronic RfDs). However, a<br />
value of 3 (vs. 10) was selected, because it was very close to the 7-year cutoff. Finally, a UF of<br />
3 was chosen to account <strong>for</strong> database deficiencies, because no two-generation reproductive<br />
and developmental toxicity studies <strong>for</strong> benzene are available.<br />
Importantly, decreased ALC is a very sensitive effect that can be measured in the blood, but<br />
there is no evidence that it is related to any functional impairment at levels of decrement near<br />
the benchmark response (U.S. EPA, 2003a). Further, WBC and ALC levels of the workers in<br />
the Rothman study were still within the normal range <strong>for</strong> hematology parameters [WBC = 5.6 +/-<br />
1.9×10 3 /mm 3 ; ALC = 1.6 +/- 0.3×10 3 /mm 3 ] (Bakerman, 2002). The normal range <strong>for</strong> WBC in<br />
adults is 4.5–11.0×10 3 /mm 3 , and <strong>for</strong> lymphocytes, the range is 1–4.8×10 3 /mm 3 (Bakerman,<br />
2002). Additionally, the levels of benzene reported in this study were not trivial, with the lowest<br />
exposure group still exposed to a median benzene concentration of 7.6 ppm and the highest<br />
group exposed to benzene concentrations in excess of 90 ppm (Rothman et al., 1996). Even<br />
with prolonged, fairly significant exposures, there was no clinically relevant toxicity reported in<br />
these workers, and marginally significant effects, especially in the lower exposure groups<br />
(median benzene concentrations of 7.6 and 13.9 ppm). Finally, evidence in humans and<br />
experimental animals indicates that cytopenias occur within weeks or months of exposure, and<br />
upon removal from the environment or reduction in benzene concentration, small alterations are<br />
likely to return to normal values (Green et al., 1981b; Snyder et al., 1981). There<strong>for</strong>e, there is<br />
no reason to suspect that the biological response from 6.3 years worth of exposure would be<br />
quantitatively or qualitatively different from that expected to occur following 7 years of exposure.<br />
This calls into question the biological rationale <strong>for</strong> EPA’s subchronic-to-chronic uncertainty<br />
factor of 3.<br />
6.1.6.2 Additional Literature <strong>for</strong> Non-Cancer Hematology Effects<br />
A sufficient body of human data exists in the scientific literature to demonstrate the<br />
hematopoietic toxicity of chronic exposure to benzene. The majority of these studies suggest<br />
that this effect follows a predictable dose response, including the presence of a threshold, in<br />
both experimental animals and humans. Doses of benzene required to suppress various cell<br />
lineages vary to some degree from one study to another. Greenburg et al. (1939) reported clear<br />
evidence of benzene hematotoxicity in the printing industry, with air concentrations of benzene<br />
frequently in excess of 400 ppm and estimated to be as high as ~1000 ppm. Goldwater (1941)<br />
also evaluated various industries with excessive benzene concentrations (10–1060 ppm) and<br />
frequently observed cases of anemia and thrombocytopenia. Lymphocytopenia was also<br />
commonly observed, but neutropenia was rare (Goldwater, 1941). Aksoy et al. (1971) reported<br />
clear evidence of hematotoxicity (decreases in WBC) in Turkish shoe workers who were<br />
exposed to air concentrations of benzene as high as 210 ppm. Kipen et al. (1988) evaluated<br />
blood samples collected during medical surveillance from the ‘pliofilm’ cohort. Conclusions<br />
Benzene <strong>VCCEP</strong> <strong>Submission</strong><br />
March 2006<br />
42