18.12.2012 Views

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

increased risk of disease. It should also be pointed out that this study is inconsistent with other<br />

recent studies that found no alterations in peripheral blood cell counts in individuals exposed to<br />

1 ppm benzene (Tsai, 2004). As described above, most of the existing literature (including<br />

studies by many of these same authors) does not indicate hematotoxicity occurring at benzene<br />

concentrations below 5-10 ppm.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, existing human data support that prolonged occupational exposure to high<br />

concentrations of benzene (greater than 10–25 ppm) can result in peripheral cytopenias and<br />

observable hematopoietic toxicity. However, there is much less consistency in the literature<br />

regarding the potential adverse effects associated with low-dose exposure (less than 5 ppm).<br />

6.1.7 Cancer<br />

6.1.7.1 Critical Study <strong>for</strong> EPA’s Benzene Cancer Slope Factor (Rinsky et al. 1987)<br />

The most important study of benzene and AML is the National Institute <strong>for</strong> Occupational Safety<br />

and Health (NIOSH)–sponsored retrospective cohort mortality study of workers involved with the<br />

manufacture of rubber hydrochloride (Pliofilm) at one of three plants in Ohio (Infante et al.,<br />

1977; Rinsky et al., 1981, 1987). The original study evaluated 748 white male workers exposed<br />

<strong>for</strong> at least 1 day in a rubber manufacturing facility. Exposure to benzene occurred in these<br />

workers during 1940–1949. No ef<strong>for</strong>t was made to evaluate individual exposures to benzene<br />

that could be used to help characterize a dose response relationship (Infante et al., 1977). In an<br />

extension of this study, Rinsky et al. (1981) reported that all seven of the leukemias were of the<br />

acute myelogenous type. This cohort was updated in 1987 and expanded to include 1165 nonsalaried<br />

white male workers employed <strong>for</strong> at least 1 day through December 1965 (Rinsky et al.,<br />

1987). Two additional AML cases were reported in this expanded cohort. Rinsky and coauthors<br />

attempted to reconstruct cumulative exposures to benzene in terms of ppm-years <strong>for</strong> all<br />

members of the expanded cohort and establish a dose-response relationship. The SMR <strong>for</strong><br />

AML was non-significant in the 0–39.99 ppm-years and the 40–199.9 ppm-year cumulative<br />

exposure categories. At 200 ppm-year, the SMR <strong>for</strong> AML was 11.86, which was statistically<br />

elevated. The last follow-up through 1996 reported five additional cases of AML with an SMR of<br />

3.37, statistically elevated at the highest exposure category (Rinsky et al., 2002). All workers<br />

with AML held jobs that first exposed them to benzene be<strong>for</strong>e 1950, and most of them be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

1945 (Paxton et al., 1994, 1992). Few direct industrial hygiene data were available during this<br />

time frame, so several attempts have been made to provide refined quantitative estimates <strong>for</strong><br />

the likely exposures that occurred during this time frame (Crump et al., 1984; Rinsky et al.,<br />

1987; Paustenbach et al., 1992; Schnatter et al., 1996b).<br />

The Rinksy (1981, 1987) study analysis of the ‘Pliofilm’ cohort was selected by EPA as the<br />

critical study <strong>for</strong> dose-response analysis and <strong>for</strong> the quantitative estimation of cancer risk to<br />

humans (Rinsky et al. 1981, 1987). This study was selected because it has ample power,<br />

reasonably good estimates of exposure (except prior to 1946), a wide range of exposure from<br />

low to high levels, and a relative lack of potential confounding chemicals. Further, the job<br />

activities of the various workers were fairly well documented. Based on data obtained from this<br />

cohort, the carcinogenic risk of inhaled benzene was calculated by EPA. Cancer risk is<br />

expressed as the air unit risk and ranges from 2.2×10 -6 to 7.8×10 -6 as the estimated increased<br />

risk <strong>for</strong> an individual who is exposed <strong>for</strong> a lifetime to 1 µg/m 3 benzene in air. The range was set<br />

by the choice of exposure estimates used (Crump and Allen 1984; Paustenbach et al. 1992).<br />

The lowest unit risk is based on the exposure estimates of Paustenbach (1992), because the<br />

exposure estimates <strong>for</strong> the Rinsky cohort are the highest. That estimate is 7.1×10 -3 at 1 ppm<br />

(2.2×10 -6 at 1 µg/m 3 ). The highest unit risk is based on Crump and Allen exposure estimates,<br />

Benzene <strong>VCCEP</strong> <strong>Submission</strong><br />

March 2006<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!