(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.0, 95% CI = 1.8-9.3) but not ALL (Shu et al., 1988). This is the only study to separate the two<br />
main <strong>for</strong>ms of acute childhood leukemia in children and reported an increase in the leukemia<br />
type associated with benzene exposure in adults. There was no quantification of benzene air<br />
concentrations and exposures to confounding chemicals could have occurred. There was also<br />
no attempt to characterize children’s direct chemical exposures that could have occurred in the<br />
home or from the general environment. Further, recall bias could have resulted in a<br />
misclassification of exposures or cases in this study. McKinney et al. (1991) also conducted a<br />
case-control study to evaluate maternal and paternal exposures to benzene and the relationship<br />
with childhood leukemia (subtype not identified). Few risk factors were identified <strong>for</strong> the mother,<br />
but paternal exposures to benzene during the pre-conception period were significantly<br />
associated with childhood leukemia (OR = 5.81, 95%CI = 1.67-26.44) (McKinney et al., 1991).<br />
This study was potentially limited by a small numbers of cases, inadequately quantified benzene<br />
exposures, and potential exposures with confounding chemicals. As with most case-control<br />
studies, recall bias could have occurred.<br />
Various other studies of childhood leukemia have failed to show an association with potential<br />
benzene exposures of parental occupations. Feingold et al, (1992) conducted a case-control<br />
study of childhood ALL and parental occupation. These investigators reported no association<br />
between maternal exposure to benzene and ALL (Feingold et al., 1992). Kaatsch et al. (1998)<br />
conducted a case control study of childhood leukemia. Though the majority of the leukemias<br />
were ALL, there were 147 cases of childhood ANLL included in the analysis (but not analyzed<br />
separately). No association between parental exposure to benzene and childhood leukemia<br />
was found (Kaatsch et al., 1998). Shu et al. (1999) examined childhood ALL with paternal or<br />
maternal exposure to benzene or ‘petroleum products’ (including during pregnancy) in a casecontrol<br />
study. There was no relationship reported (Shu et al., 1999). Feychtling et al. (2001)<br />
conducted a case control study on paternal occupation and childhood cancers including<br />
leukemia (all combined). Paternal exposure to benzene (RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.39-3.85) was<br />
not positively associated with an increased leukemia risk (Feychting et al., 2001). Infante-<br />
Rivard, et al. (2005) conducted a recent case-control study of childhood ALL and maternal<br />
exposure to various solvents. The OR <strong>for</strong> benzene was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.22-3.06) <strong>for</strong> exposure<br />
during the 2 years be<strong>for</strong>e birth, including pregnancy and 1.39 (0.31-6.25) <strong>for</strong> exposure during<br />
pregnancy (Infante-Rivard et al., 2005). The significance of this study, like the others listed in<br />
this section, was limited by small numbers, inadequate exposure assessment and exposures<br />
with confounding chemicals. Potential recall bias could have resulted in a misclassification of<br />
cases or exposures and significant changes in the study findings.<br />
In general, there is consistent support in the scientific and medical literature that parental<br />
exposure to benzene is not a causative factor in the development of childhood ALL. However,<br />
the type of leukemia most clearly associated with benzene exposure in adults is AML. It should<br />
be pointed out that the etiological risk factors <strong>for</strong> AML and ALL in both adults and children are<br />
different. Only one study was available that specifically addressed childhood AML. The other<br />
studies either combined all <strong>for</strong>ms of childhood leukemia into a single group or evaluated ALL<br />
singly. Both approaches would limit the ability of these investigations to detect a positive<br />
association between benzene and childhood AML, while increasing the likelihood of finding an<br />
association despite differing etiologies <strong>for</strong> these types of childhood leukemia. In Shu et al.,<br />
(1988), such an association was reported, but has not been independently confirmed.<br />
Additionally, 23% of the leukemia cases occurred in children 10-14 years old. Clinical literature<br />
indicates that the latency period <strong>for</strong> t-AML is approximately 5-7 years. The latency period <strong>for</strong><br />
benzene induced AML is less well characterized and could be longer, but the possibility exists<br />
that cases of leukemia occurring in older children were unrelated to in utero exposures.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, data presented in Shu et al, (1988) should be interpreted cautiously.<br />
Benzene <strong>VCCEP</strong> <strong>Submission</strong><br />
March 2006<br />
56