18.12.2012 Views

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

use of small non-road engine equipment. However, the following limitations render the few<br />

studies that provide exposure concentrations unsuitable <strong>for</strong> this exposure assessment:<br />

• Because the studies conducted by Wallace et al., and Nilsson et al., were<br />

conducted in the late 1980’s prior to the introduction of oxygenated and<br />

re<strong>for</strong>mulated gasoline, the benzene concentrations are likely to be higher than<br />

exposures which would result from use of the equipment with RFG.<br />

• In the Wallace et al., study there is only one data point available <strong>for</strong> evaluating<br />

lawn mower exposures, thus deviations around this value are unknown.<br />

• The Nilsson et al. study focused on occupationally exposed logging operators<br />

who would have a significantly different usage pattern than an average<br />

homeowner and thus, the exposures measured may overestimate that <strong>for</strong> the<br />

general population using landscaping equipment.<br />

• Use of 4-stroke small engine equipment is more common today than during the<br />

years that the studies were conducted, thus exposure estimates from use of 2stroke<br />

engines would not be representative of contemporary exposures.<br />

• The exposure estimates made by Bailey <strong>for</strong> snowmobile use were obtained from<br />

internal EPA memos, and thus have not been published in the scientific<br />

literature although the in<strong>for</strong>mation was used in the notice of proposed<br />

rulemaking (NPR) <strong>for</strong> Control of Emissions from Nonroad Large Spark Ignition<br />

Engines (66 Fed.Reg. 51098). External peer-review by the International<br />

Snowmobile Manufacturers Association (ISMA) indicates that the EPA exposure<br />

estimates are significantly overstated and that the Snook and Davis model is<br />

invalid <strong>for</strong> predicting both CO and benzene exposures from snowmobile use<br />

(ISMA, 2001). In comments submitted to EPA’s Air docket regarding the NPR,<br />

ISMA submitted an analysis conducted by Sierra Research, which<br />

demonstrated:<br />

• The wake radius calculated based on Snook & Davis’ CO emissions<br />

monitoring was unrealistically low in comparison to EPA’s inventory<br />

estimates which lead to overestimates of CO exposure;<br />

• Benzene exposures were calculated <strong>for</strong> the last person in the snowmobile<br />

train by summing the individual exposures of a single sled following a<br />

lead sled at variable distances. This method ignores the turbulence and<br />

mixing that would occur as multiple sleds passed through the wake of the<br />

lead sled and results in overestimates of benzene exposure.<br />

EPA and the state of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia are in the process of updating emissions regulations <strong>for</strong> small<br />

off-road engines, which are being phased in during the years 2001 – 2007. EPA’s and<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia’s Phase II emissions controls <strong>for</strong> small handheld and non-handheld engines are<br />

expected to reduce hydrocarbon and NOx emissions by 59% and 74%, respectively (EPA<br />

1999c, CARB, 2000). Thus, regulatory actions on the small off-road engine equipment, coupled<br />

with use of oxygenated and re<strong>for</strong>mulated gasoline will continue to result in lower operator<br />

exposures.<br />

Benzene <strong>VCCEP</strong> <strong>Submission</strong><br />

March 2006<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!