18.12.2012 Views

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 8.13. (cont.)<br />

Notes:<br />

Cancer Margin of Safety [MOS] = Point of Departure / Lifetime Average Daily Dose<br />

Lifetime average daily doses are calculated from values presented in Table 7.53, and<br />

are time-weighted based on the exposure duration over a 70-yr lifespan.<br />

Point of departure is presented in Table 8.3.<br />

Values are rounded to two significant figures.<br />

a Values represent cancer risk estimates associated with an infant ingesting human milk<br />

from a mother who is occupationally exposed to benzene, in addition to other applicable<br />

background exposures.<br />

Table 8.14. Indoor air comparison (in-home):<br />

Table 8.14. cancer margins of safety<br />

Results of cancer margin of safety analysis <strong>for</strong> exposures to indoor air.<br />

Cancer Margin of Safety<br />

(unitless)<br />

Female Male<br />

In-Home Indoor Air<br />

Typical a<br />

210 200<br />

High End a<br />

45 43<br />

Alaska 25 24<br />

Notes:<br />

Margin of Safety [MOS] = Point of Departure / Lifetime Average Daily Dose<br />

Points of departure are presented in Table 8.3.<br />

Lifetime average daily doses are calculated from values presented in Table 7.53,<br />

and are time-weighted based on the exposure duration over a 70-yr lifespan.<br />

Values are rounded to two significant figures.<br />

a Typical and high-end values <strong>for</strong> the continental United States.<br />

8.4 Risk Characterization Summary<br />

The EPA default (linear) approach of calculating HQs and excess cancer risks contains, as<br />

EPA’s acknowledges, has a significant degree of conservatism. The use of a single value <strong>for</strong><br />

the HQ and/or CSF inappropriately conveys a level of confidence or certainty about the risk<br />

estimates, when in fact the HQ and excess risk predicted using a single point estimate contain a<br />

large degree of uncertainty, and usually reflect, as with EPA’s benzene IRIS values, the upper<br />

end of the conservative range of uncertainty. Rounding to one significant figure does not<br />

alleviate this problem. Providing a range of risk estimates though, with some discussion and<br />

transparency about the uncertainty involved in the “high” and “low” guidance values (e.g.,<br />

Benzene <strong>VCCEP</strong> <strong>Submission</strong><br />

March 2006<br />

192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!