(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
(VCCEP) Tier 1 Pilot Submission for BENZENE - Tera
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 8.13. (cont.)<br />
Notes:<br />
Cancer Margin of Safety [MOS] = Point of Departure / Lifetime Average Daily Dose<br />
Lifetime average daily doses are calculated from values presented in Table 7.53, and<br />
are time-weighted based on the exposure duration over a 70-yr lifespan.<br />
Point of departure is presented in Table 8.3.<br />
Values are rounded to two significant figures.<br />
a Values represent cancer risk estimates associated with an infant ingesting human milk<br />
from a mother who is occupationally exposed to benzene, in addition to other applicable<br />
background exposures.<br />
Table 8.14. Indoor air comparison (in-home):<br />
Table 8.14. cancer margins of safety<br />
Results of cancer margin of safety analysis <strong>for</strong> exposures to indoor air.<br />
Cancer Margin of Safety<br />
(unitless)<br />
Female Male<br />
In-Home Indoor Air<br />
Typical a<br />
210 200<br />
High End a<br />
45 43<br />
Alaska 25 24<br />
Notes:<br />
Margin of Safety [MOS] = Point of Departure / Lifetime Average Daily Dose<br />
Points of departure are presented in Table 8.3.<br />
Lifetime average daily doses are calculated from values presented in Table 7.53,<br />
and are time-weighted based on the exposure duration over a 70-yr lifespan.<br />
Values are rounded to two significant figures.<br />
a Typical and high-end values <strong>for</strong> the continental United States.<br />
8.4 Risk Characterization Summary<br />
The EPA default (linear) approach of calculating HQs and excess cancer risks contains, as<br />
EPA’s acknowledges, has a significant degree of conservatism. The use of a single value <strong>for</strong><br />
the HQ and/or CSF inappropriately conveys a level of confidence or certainty about the risk<br />
estimates, when in fact the HQ and excess risk predicted using a single point estimate contain a<br />
large degree of uncertainty, and usually reflect, as with EPA’s benzene IRIS values, the upper<br />
end of the conservative range of uncertainty. Rounding to one significant figure does not<br />
alleviate this problem. Providing a range of risk estimates though, with some discussion and<br />
transparency about the uncertainty involved in the “high” and “low” guidance values (e.g.,<br />
Benzene <strong>VCCEP</strong> <strong>Submission</strong><br />
March 2006<br />
192