23.12.2012 Views

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14. Systems 529<br />

Also, <strong>the</strong> number of organizations using specialized KMS is likely to rise (Delphi<br />

1997, 19). Despite <strong>the</strong> fact that on average smaller and less KM experienced<br />

organizations participated in <strong>the</strong> FH Cologne study conducted half a year after <strong>the</strong><br />

study presented here, already 51.1% of <strong>the</strong> organizations reported to use “specific<br />

KM software” (Döring-Katerkamp/Trojan 2000, 9).<br />

Many organizations used document management systems which can be considered<br />

as one of <strong>the</strong> technological predecessors of KMS 94 . In <strong>the</strong> 1998 KPMG study,<br />

more than two thirds of <strong>the</strong> organizations (68%) used document management systems<br />

and still 46% said <strong>the</strong>y were using <strong>the</strong>se systems with KM as <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

focus (see KPMG 1998, 11). Moreover, many vendors of document management<br />

systems have extended <strong>the</strong>ir systems to include KM functionality so that it is hard<br />

to judge how many organizations really used KM functionality by exclusively<br />

looking at <strong>the</strong> systems that were implemented. This will be analyed with an investigation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> frequency with which specific KMS functions were used 95 . This analysis<br />

will be independent of what type of systems supported <strong>the</strong>se functions.<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>ehand, it will be investigated how well <strong>the</strong> various KM plat<strong>for</strong>ms and systems<br />

were integrated in <strong>the</strong> organizations. Figure C-20 shows <strong>the</strong> level of integration<br />

between KMS. Almost a third of <strong>the</strong> organizations responding to this question<br />

(16 out of 49 respondents, 32.7%) had all KMS functions ei<strong>the</strong>r integrated within a<br />

single system or at least within one single user interface, e.g., a Web browser.<br />

About half of <strong>the</strong> organizations (25 out of 49 respondents, 51%) had a medium<br />

level of integration with ei<strong>the</strong>r one main KMS from which o<strong>the</strong>r (sub-) systems can<br />

be called one-sidedly or multiple systems between which easy data transfer is possible<br />

(e.g., via drag&drop or copy&paste). There were still 16.3% of <strong>the</strong> respondents<br />

who had several KMS in place between which not even data transfer was<br />

possible.<br />

all functions integrated in one system<br />

multiple systems integrated with one user interface<br />

one main system, direct call of o<strong>the</strong>r systems possible<br />

multiple systems, data transfer possible<br />

multiple systems, no data transfer possible<br />

FIGURE C-20. Level of integration of in<strong>for</strong>mation and communication systems related<br />

to KM 96<br />

Some respondents marked multiple categories even though <strong>the</strong> ordinal scale was<br />

originally intended to be exclusive. This was especially true <strong>for</strong> multiple systems<br />

integrated with one user interface (category 4) on <strong>the</strong> one hand and one main sys-<br />

94. See also section 7.1 - “Technological roots” on page 273.<br />

95. See section 14.3 - “Functions” on page 548.<br />

96. Absolute numbers, n=49.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!