23.12.2012 Views

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

136 B. Concepts and Theories<br />

5.3.2 Barriers<br />

Successful KM initiatives also focus on lowering barriers to knowledge management.<br />

In addition to barriers negatively affecting individual learning, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

numerous barriers to an effective organizational learning and consequently to an<br />

effective KM. Due to space limitations, only <strong>the</strong> most important barriers can be<br />

listed here as well as some literature references <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> interested reader 225 . Barriers<br />

to KM are due to <strong>the</strong> following characteristics of:<br />

knowledge providers: lack of motivation, provider not perceived as reliable,<br />

ignorance, lack of skills to explicate knowledge, skilled incompetence,<br />

knowledge seekers: lack of motivation, limited absorptive, processing and learning<br />

capacity, limited retentive capacity, lack of knowledge about what knowledge<br />

already exists in organization, conservative tendency to avoid innovative<br />

learning due to an orientation towards <strong>the</strong> individual history, role-constrained<br />

learning, superstitious learning,<br />

transferred knowledge: causal ambiguity, unproven knowledge, inadequate context,<br />

inadequate framing/problem representation, inadequate temporal context,<br />

infrastructural context: barren organizational context, e.g., inflexible power<br />

structures, lack of management support, vertical, horizontal and lateral in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

filters, specialization and centralization, lack of resources and time, lack of<br />

ICT support, problems with <strong>the</strong> use of ICT,<br />

cultural context: lack of social relationships between knowledge provider and<br />

recipients, group think, exaggerated unified culture and inward-orientation.<br />

5.3.3 Knowledge risks<br />

Knowledge intensity of activities, products and services has increased substantially<br />

over <strong>the</strong> last decades. Knowledge assets as a subset of organizational assets more<br />

and more <strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> basis of competitive advantages (Mentzas et al. 2003, 1). Organizations<br />

are increasingly dependent on intangible resources, particularly knowledge<br />

assets as primary sources of competitive advantage 226 . KM typically aims at<br />

increasing documentation and thus visibility of knowledge, specifically knowledge<br />

domains, sources, media, structure, processes and systems that support handling of<br />

knowledge. KM also helps to codify knowledge, eases access to knowledge and<br />

enhances knowledge sharing in order to improve (re-)use of knowledge assets 227 .<br />

However, this bears <strong>the</strong> risk that knowledge-based competitive advantages are<br />

diluted. A large number of KM activities, measures, instruments, processes and<br />

tools can be applied striving to improve productivity of knowledge work, but do<br />

not consider how knowledge can be secured (Desouza/Vanapalli 2005, 76).<br />

225. E.g., March/Olsen 1976, 56ff, Schüppel 1996, 107ff, Szulanski 1996, 30ff, Glazer<br />

1998, 178ff, Alex et al. 2000, 50f, Astleitner/Schinagl 2000, 139ff.<br />

226. See section 5.1.1 - “From market-based to knowledge-based view” on page 94, particularly<br />

Figure B-12 on page 99.<br />

227. This is evident in <strong>the</strong> list of goals that KM initiatives direct <strong>the</strong>ir attention to which has<br />

been described in section 5.2.1 - “Strategic goals” on page 114.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!