23.12.2012 Views

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

416 B. Concepts and Theories<br />

helps <strong>the</strong> participants to structure <strong>the</strong>ir responses, automatically link <strong>the</strong>m or suggest<br />

links with relevant knowledge elements, such as a glossary or similar cases<br />

etc. The quality of <strong>the</strong> valuations of relevance could be oriented towards certain<br />

types of users, e.g., novices versus experts, general versus specific knowledge,<br />

abstract/scientific versus narrative knowledge 657 .<br />

8.4.3 Knowledge-specific services<br />

The measures in this category assess <strong>the</strong> success of <strong>the</strong> knowledge-related services<br />

in an organization which are produced by specialized employees in <strong>the</strong> roles of<br />

e.g., knowledge brokers or subject matter specialists with support of <strong>the</strong> KMS. The<br />

service should support <strong>the</strong> participants in handling knowledge with <strong>the</strong> help of <strong>the</strong><br />

KMS. The literature provides a number of criteria <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation of IS services<br />

658 . The criteria have to be adapted to knowledge-specific services. Table B-<br />

24 presents a number of measures to assess knowledge-specific services.<br />

TABLE B-24. Measures <strong>for</strong> knowledge-specific services<br />

integrative KMS interactive KMS both<br />

quality of support of<br />

knowledge publication<br />

quality of refining/<br />

repackaging knowledge<br />

quality of support of<br />

knowledge search<br />

quality of distribution<br />

of knowledge elements<br />

quality of maintenance<br />

of knowledge<br />

base (e.g., archiving/<br />

deletion of obsolete<br />

knowledge elements,<br />

maintenance of<br />

knowledge structure)<br />

quality of communication<br />

support (e.g.,<br />

help with selection<br />

and use of communication<br />

channels)<br />

quality of support <strong>for</strong><br />

communities (e.g.,<br />

moderation and structuring<br />

of discussion<br />

lists, cross-postings)<br />

quality of support <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> development of<br />

expert profiles and<br />

skills directories<br />

transparency of services<br />

reliability of services<br />

responsiveness/promptness<br />

availability of personnel<br />

assurance (credibility, competence,<br />

courtesy of personnel, communication,<br />

security)<br />

empathy (understanding/knowing<br />

KMS participants)<br />

ability to motivate participants<br />

quality of training and education<br />

one-on-one consultations or helpline<br />

appropriation support<br />

integration of knowledge-specific<br />

services into KMS<br />

error recovery (time to correct errors<br />

in KMS)<br />

time required <strong>for</strong> new developments/changes<br />

to KMS<br />

657. See also <strong>the</strong> types of knowledge distinguished in section 4.2 - “Knowledge” on page 60.<br />

658. See e.g., Ferguson/Zawacki 1993, Pitt et al. 1995, Myers et al. 1998, 105f, Guimaraes et<br />

al. 1999; see Parasuraman et al. 1985 and 1988 <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> SERVQUAL instrument; see<br />

also

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!