23.12.2012 Views

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8. Economics 403<br />

measurement is selected and discussed (section 8.3.2). Finally, some critics and<br />

extensions to this model are reviewed (section 8.3.3). The DeLone/McLean model<br />

will be used as <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> model to measure success of KMS which will be<br />

presented in section 8.4<br />

8.3.1 A multi-faceted construct<br />

Success of an in<strong>for</strong>mation system (IS) cannot be measured directly, but has to be<br />

assessed using a number of measures which are relevant <strong>for</strong> success. Since <strong>the</strong> 70s,<br />

many authors have developed approaches to assess <strong>the</strong> success of an IS. They suggested<br />

a host of variables, indicators and measures. Examples are:<br />

user (in<strong>for</strong>mation) satisfaction 621 or system acceptance 622 ,<br />

user engagement 623 , user participation 624 or user involvement 625 ,<br />

(perceived) in<strong>for</strong>mation quality626 or system quality627 ,<br />

perceived service quality: user satisfaction with <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation services function<br />

(SERVQUAL) 628 ,<br />

usage of IS 629 , usage to support specific tasks 630 ,<br />

task-technology fit631 ,<br />

success of specialized IS: impact on individual, group or organizational per<strong>for</strong>mance,<br />

such as decision support systems 632 , group (decision) support systems<br />

and group communication support systems 633 , office systems 634 , creativity support<br />

systems 635 , computer-mediated communication 636 or end-user computing<br />

637 .<br />

The measures as suggested in <strong>the</strong> literature cover all three levels of measurement—subjective<br />

assessment, semi-quantitative assessment as well as quantitative<br />

621. Zmud 1979, Bailey/Pearson 1983, Baroudi/Orlikowski 1988, Doll/Torkzadeh 1988.<br />

622. Ives/Olson 1984.<br />

623. Hwang/Thorn 1999.<br />

624. Kim/Lee 1986.<br />

625. Zmud 1979, Ives/Olson 1984.<br />

626. Bailey/Pearson 1983, Ives et al. 1983, King/Epstein 1983, Miller/Doyle 1987, Blili et<br />

al. 1998.<br />

627. Ives/Olson 1984.<br />

628. Kettinger/Lee 1994, Pitt et al. 1995, Nelson/Cooprider 1996. Many authors refer to an<br />

instrument called SERVQUAL originally developed to measure consumer’s perceptions<br />

of service quality, see Parasuraman et al. 1988, see also Kettinger/Lee 1994, 745<br />

<strong>for</strong> an overview of studies using <strong>the</strong> SERVQUAL instrument.<br />

629. Zmud 1979, Hiltz/Turoff 1981, Srinivasan 1985, Kim/Lee 1986, Straub et al. 1995,<br />

Gelderman 1998.<br />

630. Doll/Torkzadeh 1998.<br />

631. Goodhue/Thompson 1995.<br />

632. Sanders/Courtney 1985.<br />

633. DeSanctis/Gallupe 1987, Kraemer/Pinsonneault 1990, Dennis 1996, Chun/Park 1998.<br />

634. Millman/Hartwick 1987.<br />

635. Massetti 1996.<br />

636. Kettinger/Grover 1997, Kock 1998.<br />

637. Blili et al. 1998; an early generalized review of MIS success can also be found in Zmud<br />

1979.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!