23.12.2012 Views

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Strategy 137<br />

This section defines <strong>the</strong> concept of knowledge risk. The concept employs an<br />

operational risk perspective that is focused on business processes and knowledge<br />

assets that are affected by knowledge risks. Moreover, a process <strong>for</strong> management<br />

of knowledge risks is defined in section 5.3.4. Section 5.3.5 <strong>the</strong>n gives an outlook<br />

to an explorative empirical study in this increasingly important research field<br />

within KM.<br />

Risk management has long been recognized as integral part of management, but<br />

companies have embraced this topic only recently as consequence of e.g., dynamic<br />

environments, networked IT-infrastructures, prominent bankruptcies and subsequent<br />

regulations like Sarbanes-Oxley-Act, EU’s 8 th Directive, Basel II, HIPAA or<br />

KonTraG. Despite <strong>the</strong> acknowledged importance of knowledge assets, predominantly<br />

market, credit and operational risks are targeted, whereas risks that affect<br />

knowledge assets, also called knowledge risks, are considered marginally at most.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> perspective of strategic management, <strong>the</strong> knowledge-based view<br />

which has been developed on <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> resource-based view 228 stresses <strong>the</strong><br />

importance of knowledge assets <strong>for</strong> competitive advantage. The term asset can be<br />

defined “as firm-specific resources that are indispensable to create value <strong>for</strong> firms”<br />

(Nonaka et al. 2000, 20). Tangible assets can be subdivided into physical assets<br />

like plants or machines as well as in financial assets, whereas intangible assets lack<br />

physical embodiment and include <strong>for</strong> example brands, reputation, licenses or<br />

skills 229 . Knowledge assets are considered as <strong>the</strong> subset of intangible assets (Teece<br />

2002, 15) that is based on knowledge.<br />

Knowledge can reside on different media 230 (see Figure B-18). The primary<br />

media knowledge resides on are employees who provide skills and experiences 231 .<br />

Knowledge can be embedded in organizational routines, procedures and structures<br />

232 . Organizational capabilities bundle knowledge assets in order to contribute<br />

directly or indirectly to <strong>the</strong> creation of value (Grant 2001, 118). Knowledge can<br />

also be incorporated into objects which comprise different <strong>for</strong>ms of intellectual<br />

property, e.g., patents, as well as products and services 233 . From <strong>the</strong> perspective of<br />

<strong>the</strong> knowledge-based view, IT infrastructures can also be seen as knowledge assets<br />

that support <strong>the</strong> incorporation of knowledge into products and services by helping<br />

to document, by administrating and by providing access to documented, codified<br />

knowledge (Marr et al. 2004, 562).<br />

The term risk is discussed heterogeneously in management and economics and<br />

focuses ei<strong>the</strong>r on its causes or its impacts. As one of <strong>the</strong> pioneers, Knight (1921,<br />

231) defined risk as “measurable uncertainty” whereas in Gallati’s view risk is “a<br />

condition in which exists a possibility of deviation from desired outcome that is<br />

228. See e.g., Wernerfelt 1984, Barney 1991, Grant 1991, 1996a, 1996b, Spender 1996a and<br />

section 5.1.1 - “From market-based to knowledge-based view” on page 94.<br />

229. E.g., Barney 1991, 110f, Hall 1992, 136ff, Grant 2001, 111ff, Lev 2005, 300.<br />

230. E.g., Nonaka et al. 2000, 20ff, Cummings/Teng 2003, 43f.<br />

231. E.g., Mentzas et al. 2003, 27, Marr 2004, 4.<br />

232. E.g., Matusik 2002, 465, Szulanski/Jensen 2004, 348.<br />

233. E.g., Sullivan 1999, 133, Contractor 2000, 245, Lev 2005, 200.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!