23.12.2012 Views

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Preface</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Edition</strong><br />

Three years have gone by since <strong>the</strong> second edition of this book. A number of developments<br />

could be observed over this period that have affected knowledge management<br />

(KM) and knowledge management systems (KMS). There is much more<br />

awareness about <strong>the</strong> importance of knowledge as strategic asset. Thus, <strong>the</strong> management<br />

part in KM has been streng<strong>the</strong>ned with more emphasis on knowledge-intensive<br />

business processes, on process-oriented design of KM activities and on<br />

targeted interventions with <strong>the</strong> help of a set of KM instruments. Supporting KM<br />

with in<strong>for</strong>mation and communication technologies (ICT) has survived <strong>the</strong> through<br />

of disillusionment. KM has gained increasing attention from diverse research disciplines.<br />

Indicators are <strong>the</strong> number of publications, conferences, Bachelor, Master<br />

and advanced education programs, new journals or existing journals <strong>the</strong> mission of<br />

which has been changed to focus KM or to extend <strong>the</strong> existing focus to include<br />

KM. After some slow-down, KM is also back on <strong>the</strong> agenda in many businesses<br />

and organizations. Indicators are an increasing number of case studies, growing<br />

interest in KM-oriented industry networks, a higher demand <strong>for</strong> internships, student<br />

workers as well as part- and full-time personnel with experience in KM, as<br />

well as more attendance on KM conferences, workshops and <strong>the</strong> like.<br />

Skeptics thought that KM was yet ano<strong>the</strong>r passing management fad denoting<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r something that we have always been doing or something that we would (and<br />

should) never pursue. In a global trend to cut costs, many KM programs suffered.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> underlying goal of substantially increasing productivity of knowledge<br />

work has paved <strong>the</strong> ground <strong>for</strong> an enduring ef<strong>for</strong>t that does not shy away from<br />

<strong>the</strong> uneasy questions that arise when it comes to showing <strong>the</strong> impact of KM initiatives<br />

and KMS on <strong>the</strong> financial results of an organization. Even though economics<br />

of knowledge (management) <strong>the</strong>oretically are only marginally understood, many<br />

organizations now use indicators to measure success of <strong>the</strong>ir KM initiatives. More<br />

and more organizations have implemented KM and KMS in <strong>the</strong> last decade. Many<br />

have included some knowledge-oriented aspects into <strong>the</strong>ir standard management<br />

practices. From a technical perspective, some innovative developments of <strong>the</strong> mid

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!