23.12.2012 Views

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

Preface for the Third Edition - Read

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

420 B. Concepts and Theories<br />

and shortly after improved (shortened) by Ives et al. (1983, 789ff) 660 as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

similar instrument developed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of end-user computing by Doll/Torkzadeh<br />

(1988) 661 . The instruments are quite extensive: Bailey and Pearson’s instrument<br />

comprises 39 variables (Bailey/Pearson 1983, 539ff), Doll and Torkzadeh’s<br />

consists of 12 variables (Doll/Torkzadeh 1988, 266ff). However, most of <strong>the</strong> variables<br />

in <strong>the</strong>se instruments fall into <strong>the</strong> categories (perceived) in<strong>for</strong>mation and system<br />

quality and service quality and thus were discussed in <strong>the</strong> corresponding categories<br />

662 . In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong>se variables assess user satisfaction indirectly. In <strong>the</strong><br />

following, those variables will be discussed which directly assess user satisfaction<br />

as well as a couple of variables measuring <strong>the</strong> perceived participation and control<br />

of users in <strong>the</strong> KMS’s design (see Table B-26).<br />

TABLE B-26. Measures <strong>for</strong> user satisfaction<br />

integrative KMS interactive KMS both<br />

satisfaction with <strong>the</strong> publishing<br />

instruments & procedures<br />

satisfaction with knowledge<br />

search functions<br />

knowledge satisfaction:<br />

difference between knowledge<br />

elements needed and<br />

amount of knowledge elements<br />

received<br />

satisfaction with knowledge<br />

elements presented in<br />

KMS (contents and structure)<br />

satisfaction with communication<br />

media<br />

satisfaction with interactions<br />

in communities<br />

satisfaction with functions<br />

and contents supporting<br />

<strong>the</strong> location of<br />

experts/knowledge<br />

providers<br />

overall satisfaction<br />

positive attitude towards KMS<br />

realization of expectations/<br />

demand <strong>for</strong> redesign<br />

perceived utility<br />

demand <strong>for</strong> redesign<br />

satisfaction with interface<br />

satisfaction with knowledgespecific<br />

services<br />

understanding of KMS<br />

enjoyment<br />

feeling of participation<br />

feeling of control over KMS<br />

developments/changes<br />

Satisfaction with integrative KMS can be detailed according to <strong>the</strong> main functions<br />

that are supported by <strong>the</strong> systems, namely publishing and accessing knowledge<br />

elements. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, participants can be asked <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir satisfaction with<br />

<strong>the</strong> contents of <strong>the</strong> KMS as well as <strong>the</strong> knowledge structure and visualization of<br />

links. Knowledge satisfaction describes in analogy to in<strong>for</strong>mation satisfaction <strong>the</strong><br />

difference between knowledge needed and <strong>the</strong> amount (and also <strong>the</strong> quality) of<br />

knowledge elements received (e.g., Olson/Ives 1982, 51).<br />

660. See also Zmud 1979, Ives/Olsen 1984, Baroudi et al. 1986, Baroudi/Orlikowski 1988,<br />

Li 1997, Blili et al. 1998.<br />

661. See also its applications, e.g., in Igbaria/Tan 1997, McHaney/Cronan 1998, Downing<br />

1999.<br />

662. See sections 8.4.1 - “System quality” on page 413 and 8.4.3 - “Knowledge-specific services”<br />

on page 416.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!