On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.1. Electroweak Precision Observables 95<br />
parameter is related to ρ = m 2 W /(m2 Z c2 w) = 1 + αT , which is protected by <strong>the</strong> approximate<br />
global SU(2)L × SU(2)R symmetry of <strong>the</strong> Higgs sector. This global symmetry,<br />
is generally assumed to be realized <strong>in</strong> TC extensions of <strong>the</strong> SM as well, which leads<br />
to small deviations.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imal RS model, <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g contributions to <strong>the</strong> oblique parameters arise<br />
from mix<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> KK excitations <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> zero mode gauge bosons, [115, 140, 139],<br />
S = 2πv2<br />
M 2 �<br />
1 −<br />
KK<br />
1<br />
�<br />
, T =<br />
L<br />
π2v 2c2 wM 2 �<br />
L −<br />
KK<br />
1<br />
�<br />
. (3.6)<br />
L<br />
The result is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.2, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> cross is at <strong>the</strong> best fit po<strong>in</strong>t with<br />
68%, 95% and 99% confidence level (CL) ellipses <strong>in</strong> shades of yellow, gray and blue<br />
respectively, <strong>the</strong> star is <strong>the</strong> SM prediction and <strong>the</strong> orange (red) band ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
direction of a large T parameter shows (3.6) for a KK scale of 3 − 10 TeV (1 − 3)<br />
TeV. In addition, <strong>the</strong> effect of vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> volume of <strong>the</strong> extra dimension L ∈ [5, 36]<br />
is plotted with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g L <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> arrow. Two th<strong>in</strong>gs are remarkable<br />
here. First, <strong>the</strong> S parameter seems to be under control. This can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as<br />
an unexpected nice result from <strong>the</strong> holographic <strong>the</strong>ory, because it seems to contradict<br />
<strong>the</strong> estimates rely<strong>in</strong>g on NDA or upscaled QCD (keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>the</strong> RS model is<br />
dual to a large Nc strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory). However, it was shown for holographic<br />
higgsless models, that if one localizes <strong>the</strong> fermions on <strong>the</strong> UV brane, a large positive<br />
contribution to S <strong>in</strong> very good agreement with <strong>the</strong> naive estimates occurs, compare<br />
[141, Sec.3]. <strong>On</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, models with IR brane localized fermions give large<br />
(order L) negative contributions to S, as discovered <strong>in</strong> [142, Sec.3].<br />
In [143] <strong>the</strong>se results could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by show<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> contributions to <strong>the</strong> S<br />
parameter are sensitive to <strong>the</strong> localization of <strong>the</strong> fermions and vanish for c ≈ −1/2.<br />
This dependence is not <strong>the</strong> visible <strong>in</strong> (3.6), because we only consider universal corrections<br />
<strong>the</strong>re. It can be motivated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dual <strong>the</strong>ory described <strong>in</strong> Section 2.2, how a<br />
different fermion localization may affect <strong>the</strong> S parameter. If <strong>the</strong> quarks are conf<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />
<strong>the</strong> UV brane, <strong>the</strong>y are elementary fermions with direct coupl<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> electroweak<br />
gauge bosons and reproduce <strong>the</strong> SM quark contributions to S, while <strong>the</strong> composite<br />
fields live <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> IR and contribute <strong>in</strong> agreement with what we expect from a strongly<br />
<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ory. Conf<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> quarks to <strong>the</strong> IR brane makes <strong>the</strong>m fully composite<br />
and coupl<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> electroweak gauge bosons can only occur through mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with composite vector bosons (<strong>the</strong>re is no direct coupl<strong>in</strong>g due to <strong>the</strong> large anomalous<br />
dimension of IR localized fields). Therefore, <strong>the</strong> contribution from <strong>the</strong> elementary<br />
quarks to <strong>the</strong> reference value S = 0 is not present <strong>in</strong> this model, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a negative<br />
value of S, even though <strong>the</strong> technifermions still give positive corrections. The<br />
possibility to achieve moderate S can <strong>the</strong>refore be viewed as ano<strong>the</strong>r advantage of<br />
partially composite fermions.<br />
The second remark is, that <strong>the</strong> T parameter is enhanced by a volume factor and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
significantly larger than expected from NDA. An explanation can also be found<br />
from <strong>the</strong> dual description. In Section 2.2 it was shown that a global symmetry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory is described by a bulk gauge symmetry. As po<strong>in</strong>ted out above,<br />
<strong>the</strong> T parameter is small because it is protected by a global symmetry, <strong>the</strong> custodial<br />
SU(2)L × SU(2)R. The m<strong>in</strong>imal model as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.1, with <strong>the</strong> SM gauge