05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.1. Electroweak Precision Observables 95<br />

parameter is related to ρ = m 2 W /(m2 Z c2 w) = 1 + αT , which is protected by <strong>the</strong> approximate<br />

global SU(2)L × SU(2)R symmetry of <strong>the</strong> Higgs sector. This global symmetry,<br />

is generally assumed to be realized <strong>in</strong> TC extensions of <strong>the</strong> SM as well, which leads<br />

to small deviations.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imal RS model, <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g contributions to <strong>the</strong> oblique parameters arise<br />

from mix<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> KK excitations <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> zero mode gauge bosons, [115, 140, 139],<br />

S = 2πv2<br />

M 2 �<br />

1 −<br />

KK<br />

1<br />

�<br />

, T =<br />

L<br />

π2v 2c2 wM 2 �<br />

L −<br />

KK<br />

1<br />

�<br />

. (3.6)<br />

L<br />

The result is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.2, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> cross is at <strong>the</strong> best fit po<strong>in</strong>t with<br />

68%, 95% and 99% confidence level (CL) ellipses <strong>in</strong> shades of yellow, gray and blue<br />

respectively, <strong>the</strong> star is <strong>the</strong> SM prediction and <strong>the</strong> orange (red) band ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

direction of a large T parameter shows (3.6) for a KK scale of 3 − 10 TeV (1 − 3)<br />

TeV. In addition, <strong>the</strong> effect of vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> volume of <strong>the</strong> extra dimension L ∈ [5, 36]<br />

is plotted with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g L <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> direction of <strong>the</strong> arrow. Two th<strong>in</strong>gs are remarkable<br />

here. First, <strong>the</strong> S parameter seems to be under control. This can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted as<br />

an unexpected nice result from <strong>the</strong> holographic <strong>the</strong>ory, because it seems to contradict<br />

<strong>the</strong> estimates rely<strong>in</strong>g on NDA or upscaled QCD (keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>the</strong> RS model is<br />

dual to a large Nc strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory). However, it was shown for holographic<br />

higgsless models, that if one localizes <strong>the</strong> fermions on <strong>the</strong> UV brane, a large positive<br />

contribution to S <strong>in</strong> very good agreement with <strong>the</strong> naive estimates occurs, compare<br />

[141, Sec.3]. <strong>On</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, models with IR brane localized fermions give large<br />

(order L) negative contributions to S, as discovered <strong>in</strong> [142, Sec.3].<br />

In [143] <strong>the</strong>se results could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by show<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> contributions to <strong>the</strong> S<br />

parameter are sensitive to <strong>the</strong> localization of <strong>the</strong> fermions and vanish for c ≈ −1/2.<br />

This dependence is not <strong>the</strong> visible <strong>in</strong> (3.6), because we only consider universal corrections<br />

<strong>the</strong>re. It can be motivated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dual <strong>the</strong>ory described <strong>in</strong> Section 2.2, how a<br />

different fermion localization may affect <strong>the</strong> S parameter. If <strong>the</strong> quarks are conf<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />

<strong>the</strong> UV brane, <strong>the</strong>y are elementary fermions with direct coupl<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> electroweak<br />

gauge bosons and reproduce <strong>the</strong> SM quark contributions to S, while <strong>the</strong> composite<br />

fields live <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> IR and contribute <strong>in</strong> agreement with what we expect from a strongly<br />

<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ory. Conf<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> quarks to <strong>the</strong> IR brane makes <strong>the</strong>m fully composite<br />

and coupl<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> electroweak gauge bosons can only occur through mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with composite vector bosons (<strong>the</strong>re is no direct coupl<strong>in</strong>g due to <strong>the</strong> large anomalous<br />

dimension of IR localized fields). Therefore, <strong>the</strong> contribution from <strong>the</strong> elementary<br />

quarks to <strong>the</strong> reference value S = 0 is not present <strong>in</strong> this model, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a negative<br />

value of S, even though <strong>the</strong> technifermions still give positive corrections. The<br />

possibility to achieve moderate S can <strong>the</strong>refore be viewed as ano<strong>the</strong>r advantage of<br />

partially composite fermions.<br />

The second remark is, that <strong>the</strong> T parameter is enhanced by a volume factor and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

significantly larger than expected from NDA. An explanation can also be found<br />

from <strong>the</strong> dual description. In Section 2.2 it was shown that a global symmetry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory is described by a bulk gauge symmetry. As po<strong>in</strong>ted out above,<br />

<strong>the</strong> T parameter is small because it is protected by a global symmetry, <strong>the</strong> custodial<br />

SU(2)L × SU(2)R. The m<strong>in</strong>imal model as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.1, with <strong>the</strong> SM gauge

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!