05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 Chapter 1. Introduction: <strong>Problem</strong>s beyond <strong>the</strong> Standard Model<br />

orders <strong>in</strong> λ)<br />

(Cd 11 + Cd 22 )λ2<br />

Λ2 (<br />

Fl<br />

¯ Q2 d c 1)( ¯ Q2 d c 1) , (1.69)<br />

and <strong>the</strong>re is no reason why, consider<strong>in</strong>g an abelian symmetry, <strong>the</strong> diagonal coefficients<br />

Cd ii should be related. In Nelson Strassler type models (or <strong>in</strong> warped extra dimensions)<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is also no reason to assume this, but <strong>the</strong> coefficients are <strong>in</strong>dividually small,<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y are proportional to <strong>the</strong> localizations of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>volved light flavors or <strong>the</strong><br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g mix<strong>in</strong>g angles (compare <strong>the</strong> discussion at <strong>the</strong> end of 1.1). Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

models with Yukawa hierarchies <strong>in</strong>duced from strong renormalization group runn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

do not actually have an underly<strong>in</strong>g flavor symmetry. At <strong>the</strong> flavor scale, <strong>the</strong> Yukawa<br />

coupl<strong>in</strong>g is an anarchic order one matrix, which does not <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> global symmetry<br />

group of <strong>the</strong> Lagrangian compared to <strong>the</strong> low energy <strong>the</strong>ory. This is an advantage,<br />

because <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Froggatt Nielsen model <strong>the</strong> Yukawa coupl<strong>in</strong>gs emerge as effective operators<br />

from a fundamental flavor symmetric <strong>the</strong>ory. The break<strong>in</strong>g of this cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

symmetry by <strong>the</strong> vev of φ results <strong>in</strong> massless Goldstone bosons. As a consequence, it<br />

can not be realized exactly and even <strong>the</strong>n, light Would-be Nambu Goldstone bosons<br />

are bound to appear. This is <strong>the</strong> reason why, after it became known that a rich flavor<br />

sector is realized <strong>in</strong> nature (basically after <strong>the</strong> discovery of <strong>the</strong> charm quark), most of<br />

<strong>the</strong> proposals for a underly<strong>in</strong>g symmetry were based on discrete groups, most of <strong>the</strong>m<br />

non-abelian ones (see [73, Ref.5]).<br />

Non Abelian <strong>Flavor</strong> Symmetry<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r way to avoid <strong>the</strong> FCNC problem of ablian flavor <strong>the</strong>ories is to assume nonabelian<br />

flavor symmetries, which can ensure <strong>the</strong> coefficient matrix of (1.68) to be<br />

universal. In <strong>the</strong>se approaches, <strong>the</strong> maximal U(3) 3 = U(3)Q × U(3)u × U(3)d quark<br />

flavor symmetry, or a non-abelian subgroup, is considered to be broken by flavon<br />

fields which transform <strong>in</strong> a χ ∼ (¯3, 3) under <strong>the</strong> respective U(3)s (or a correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

equivalent for smaller flavor groups) <strong>in</strong> order to make <strong>the</strong> Yukawa coupl<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

1<br />

ΛFl<br />

χu ¯ Q ˜ Hu c + 1<br />

ΛFl<br />

χd ¯ QHd c<br />

(1.70)<br />

<strong>in</strong>variant. The problems regard<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>uous groups mentioned at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> last<br />

section have lost noth<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong>ir validity and it is <strong>the</strong>refore preferable to consider<br />

a discrete flavor symmetry, <strong>in</strong> this case a discrete subgroup of U(3) 3 . In pr<strong>in</strong>ciple,<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r solution would be to gauge <strong>the</strong> flavor group <strong>in</strong> order to get rid of <strong>the</strong> massless<br />

Goldstone modes. However, <strong>the</strong> small break<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> light flavor sector will generate<br />

very light flavor gauge bosons, as was already po<strong>in</strong>ted out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> very first papers<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g gauged flavor groups [73]. But also if a discrete non-abelian subgroup is<br />

realized, it should emerge from a gauged group via spontaneous break<strong>in</strong>g, because<br />

fundamental global symmetries are not respected by quantum gravity (e.g. a black<br />

hole may eat a proton and Hawk<strong>in</strong>g radiate a positron). Assum<strong>in</strong>g such an explanation<br />

is found, renormalizable terms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> flavon potential might still be <strong>in</strong>variant under<br />

an accidental cont<strong>in</strong>uous symmetry, lead<strong>in</strong>g to Goldstone bosons. Higher dimensional

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!