On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
18 Chapter 1. Introduction: <strong>Problem</strong>s beyond <strong>the</strong> Standard Model<br />
SU(2)L × U(1)Y<br />
break<strong>in</strong>g vacuum<br />
v<br />
θ<br />
R = f<br />
SU(2)L × U(1)Y<br />
preserv<strong>in</strong>g vacuum<br />
Figure 1.5: Circle of a priori degenerate m<strong>in</strong>ima <strong>in</strong> Composite Higgs models with<br />
radius R = f, <strong>the</strong> scale at which <strong>the</strong> global <strong>the</strong>ory is broken and <strong>the</strong> Higgs emerges<br />
as a pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson. The angle θ measures <strong>the</strong> (mis-)alignment with<br />
<strong>the</strong> EWSB vacuum.<br />
contribution to <strong>the</strong> potential re<strong>in</strong>troduces a tension comparable to <strong>the</strong> situation of<br />
higgsless TC models, consult [61, Sec.3.4] for details.<br />
In terms of <strong>the</strong> angle s<strong>in</strong> θ, it also becomes clear how composite Higgs models can be<br />
seen as a l<strong>in</strong>k between <strong>the</strong> SM with an elementary Higgs scalar and TC <strong>the</strong>ories. If<br />
f → ∞, s<strong>in</strong> θ → 0 and all composite states besides <strong>the</strong> Higgs decouple, so that <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ory effectively has an elementary Higgs. For v → f however, s<strong>in</strong> θ → 1 and <strong>the</strong><br />
model predicts only a s<strong>in</strong>gle characteristic scale, at which <strong>the</strong> composites form and<br />
EWSB occurs, just like TC.<br />
Collective Symmetry Break<strong>in</strong>g<br />
In composite Higgs models one can achieve a natural separation of scales v < f,<br />
but <strong>the</strong> Higgs mass does still encounter quadratically divergent corrections up to <strong>the</strong><br />
compositeness scale, because gauge and Yukawa <strong>in</strong>teractions explicitly break <strong>the</strong> shift<br />
symmetry which protects it. Therefore, a large separation v ≪ f is unnatural. Loosely<br />
speak<strong>in</strong>g, one could say that <strong>the</strong> Higgs does not profit from be<strong>in</strong>g a Nambu Goldstone<br />
boson.<br />
This was <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>spiration for <strong>the</strong> mechanism of collective symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g, which is<br />
realized <strong>in</strong> a class of models called little Higgs [38]. 17 The idea is, that <strong>the</strong> global<br />
symmetry, which breaks dynamically <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> composite Higgs model is larger than<br />
necessary <strong>in</strong> order to accommodate <strong>the</strong> four Goldstone bosons which are identified<br />
with <strong>the</strong> degrees of freedom of <strong>the</strong> Higgs, and <strong>the</strong> electroweak gauge group is enlarged<br />
as well, so that <strong>the</strong>re is at least ano<strong>the</strong>r copy of W ± s and <strong>the</strong> Z, which becomes heavy<br />
by eat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> additional GBs.<br />
17 The name is motivated, because <strong>the</strong> Higgs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se models is naturally light = little. See Section<br />
1.3 <strong>in</strong> [38].