05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18 Chapter 1. Introduction: <strong>Problem</strong>s beyond <strong>the</strong> Standard Model<br />

SU(2)L × U(1)Y<br />

break<strong>in</strong>g vacuum<br />

v<br />

θ<br />

R = f<br />

SU(2)L × U(1)Y<br />

preserv<strong>in</strong>g vacuum<br />

Figure 1.5: Circle of a priori degenerate m<strong>in</strong>ima <strong>in</strong> Composite Higgs models with<br />

radius R = f, <strong>the</strong> scale at which <strong>the</strong> global <strong>the</strong>ory is broken and <strong>the</strong> Higgs emerges<br />

as a pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson. The angle θ measures <strong>the</strong> (mis-)alignment with<br />

<strong>the</strong> EWSB vacuum.<br />

contribution to <strong>the</strong> potential re<strong>in</strong>troduces a tension comparable to <strong>the</strong> situation of<br />

higgsless TC models, consult [61, Sec.3.4] for details.<br />

In terms of <strong>the</strong> angle s<strong>in</strong> θ, it also becomes clear how composite Higgs models can be<br />

seen as a l<strong>in</strong>k between <strong>the</strong> SM with an elementary Higgs scalar and TC <strong>the</strong>ories. If<br />

f → ∞, s<strong>in</strong> θ → 0 and all composite states besides <strong>the</strong> Higgs decouple, so that <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ory effectively has an elementary Higgs. For v → f however, s<strong>in</strong> θ → 1 and <strong>the</strong><br />

model predicts only a s<strong>in</strong>gle characteristic scale, at which <strong>the</strong> composites form and<br />

EWSB occurs, just like TC.<br />

Collective Symmetry Break<strong>in</strong>g<br />

In composite Higgs models one can achieve a natural separation of scales v < f,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> Higgs mass does still encounter quadratically divergent corrections up to <strong>the</strong><br />

compositeness scale, because gauge and Yukawa <strong>in</strong>teractions explicitly break <strong>the</strong> shift<br />

symmetry which protects it. Therefore, a large separation v ≪ f is unnatural. Loosely<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g, one could say that <strong>the</strong> Higgs does not profit from be<strong>in</strong>g a Nambu Goldstone<br />

boson.<br />

This was <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>spiration for <strong>the</strong> mechanism of collective symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g, which is<br />

realized <strong>in</strong> a class of models called little Higgs [38]. 17 The idea is, that <strong>the</strong> global<br />

symmetry, which breaks dynamically <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> composite Higgs model is larger than<br />

necessary <strong>in</strong> order to accommodate <strong>the</strong> four Goldstone bosons which are identified<br />

with <strong>the</strong> degrees of freedom of <strong>the</strong> Higgs, and <strong>the</strong> electroweak gauge group is enlarged<br />

as well, so that <strong>the</strong>re is at least ano<strong>the</strong>r copy of W ± s and <strong>the</strong> Z, which becomes heavy<br />

by eat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> additional GBs.<br />

17 The name is motivated, because <strong>the</strong> Higgs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se models is naturally light = little. See Section<br />

1.3 <strong>in</strong> [38].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!