05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26 Chapter 1. Introduction: <strong>Problem</strong>s beyond <strong>the</strong> Standard Model<br />

where <strong>the</strong> 5D curvature, derived from GMN, and <strong>the</strong> 4D curvature, derived from <strong>the</strong><br />

4D block of GMN, gµν = e −2σ ηµν, are related by R5(G) = e 2σ(φ) R4(g) + . . . up to<br />

terms which vanish upon φ-<strong>in</strong>tegration or cancel with cosmological constant terms.<br />

Match<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> 4D E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>-Hilbert action implies that<br />

M 2 Pl = M 3 Pl(5)<br />

k<br />

�<br />

1 − e −2krcπ�<br />

, (1.53)<br />

which, as a consequence of <strong>the</strong> strong curvature, is largely <strong>in</strong>dependent of <strong>the</strong> radius<br />

rc, <strong>in</strong> contrast to (1.47). Likewise, <strong>the</strong> masses of <strong>the</strong> KK excitations are not tied to<br />

<strong>the</strong> radius of <strong>the</strong> extra dimension, but depend on <strong>the</strong> curvature scale mn ∼ nMKK,<br />

where<br />

MKK ≡ ke krcπ = k ΛIR<br />

ΛUV<br />

. (1.54)<br />

The observation, that (1.53) is not sensitive to <strong>the</strong> limit rc → ∞ led to a subsequent<br />

paper of Randall and Sundrum, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y proposed a model with an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

warped extra dimension as an alternative to compactification [56].<br />

Equation (1.50) suggests, that solv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> hierarchy problem only require <strong>the</strong> Higgs<br />

to stay at <strong>the</strong> IR brane. The conclusions are not altered if all o<strong>the</strong>r SM fields are<br />

promoted to bulk fields, which was explored soon after <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al paper for bulk<br />

gauge bosons <strong>in</strong> [57], and bulk fermions <strong>in</strong> [58, 59]. Similar to <strong>the</strong> split fermion idea<br />

<strong>in</strong> UED, a localization <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk will lead to a suppression of dangerous higher<br />

dimensional operators, because <strong>the</strong> overlaps of <strong>the</strong> extra dimensional wavefunctions<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs. Due to <strong>the</strong> warp<strong>in</strong>g it can also accommodate<br />

hierarchical fermion masses and mix<strong>in</strong>gs com<strong>in</strong>g from anarchic 5D Yukawa coupl<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

as well as a suppression of tree-level flavor violat<strong>in</strong>g effects. These features will be<br />

elaborated on <strong>in</strong> Section 2.4 and 2.5.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> AdS/CFT duality, it can be motivated, that <strong>the</strong> RS model<br />

is dual to a strong <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g four dimensional <strong>the</strong>ory, see Section 2.2. Therefore,<br />

many concepts <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Section 1.1 have an alternative, so called holographic<br />

5D description, which may at first glance look like an entirely different <strong>the</strong>ory. So<br />

is for example <strong>the</strong> warped higgsless model dual to a walk<strong>in</strong>g TC <strong>the</strong>ory [63]. The<br />

warped version of a gauge-Higgs unification model is a dual description of a composite<br />

pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Higgs 19 [62, Sec.4] and <strong>the</strong> mechanism of collective<br />

symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g can be implemented by an enlarged bulk gauge group [60].<br />

It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note, that this dual description for <strong>the</strong> RS scenario, where gravity is<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk and <strong>the</strong> graviton can <strong>the</strong>refore be understood as a composite of <strong>the</strong> brane<br />

Yang-Mills <strong>the</strong>ory seem<strong>in</strong>gly contradicts a no-go <strong>the</strong>orem, <strong>the</strong> We<strong>in</strong>berg-Witten <strong>the</strong>orem<br />

[79]. It states among o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs, that a massless graviton cannot be a composite<br />

state. Very rem<strong>in</strong>iscent of <strong>the</strong> Coleman-Mandula <strong>the</strong>orem and SUSY, <strong>the</strong> AdS/CFT<br />

correspondence makes use of a loophole, because <strong>the</strong> 5D graviton can be described by<br />

a composite state on <strong>the</strong> four dimensional boundary, see [80] for details.<br />

19 An <strong>in</strong>dication of this relation may be that <strong>the</strong> extra-dimensional components of <strong>the</strong> gauge fields<br />

transforms under <strong>the</strong> 5D gauge symmetry like under a shift symmetry.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!