On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
26 Chapter 1. Introduction: <strong>Problem</strong>s beyond <strong>the</strong> Standard Model<br />
where <strong>the</strong> 5D curvature, derived from GMN, and <strong>the</strong> 4D curvature, derived from <strong>the</strong><br />
4D block of GMN, gµν = e −2σ ηµν, are related by R5(G) = e 2σ(φ) R4(g) + . . . up to<br />
terms which vanish upon φ-<strong>in</strong>tegration or cancel with cosmological constant terms.<br />
Match<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> 4D E<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong>-Hilbert action implies that<br />
M 2 Pl = M 3 Pl(5)<br />
k<br />
�<br />
1 − e −2krcπ�<br />
, (1.53)<br />
which, as a consequence of <strong>the</strong> strong curvature, is largely <strong>in</strong>dependent of <strong>the</strong> radius<br />
rc, <strong>in</strong> contrast to (1.47). Likewise, <strong>the</strong> masses of <strong>the</strong> KK excitations are not tied to<br />
<strong>the</strong> radius of <strong>the</strong> extra dimension, but depend on <strong>the</strong> curvature scale mn ∼ nMKK,<br />
where<br />
MKK ≡ ke krcπ = k ΛIR<br />
ΛUV<br />
. (1.54)<br />
The observation, that (1.53) is not sensitive to <strong>the</strong> limit rc → ∞ led to a subsequent<br />
paper of Randall and Sundrum, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y proposed a model with an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
warped extra dimension as an alternative to compactification [56].<br />
Equation (1.50) suggests, that solv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> hierarchy problem only require <strong>the</strong> Higgs<br />
to stay at <strong>the</strong> IR brane. The conclusions are not altered if all o<strong>the</strong>r SM fields are<br />
promoted to bulk fields, which was explored soon after <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al paper for bulk<br />
gauge bosons <strong>in</strong> [57], and bulk fermions <strong>in</strong> [58, 59]. Similar to <strong>the</strong> split fermion idea<br />
<strong>in</strong> UED, a localization <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk will lead to a suppression of dangerous higher<br />
dimensional operators, because <strong>the</strong> overlaps of <strong>the</strong> extra dimensional wavefunctions<br />
determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs. Due to <strong>the</strong> warp<strong>in</strong>g it can also accommodate<br />
hierarchical fermion masses and mix<strong>in</strong>gs com<strong>in</strong>g from anarchic 5D Yukawa coupl<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
as well as a suppression of tree-level flavor violat<strong>in</strong>g effects. These features will be<br />
elaborated on <strong>in</strong> Section 2.4 and 2.5.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> AdS/CFT duality, it can be motivated, that <strong>the</strong> RS model<br />
is dual to a strong <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g four dimensional <strong>the</strong>ory, see Section 2.2. Therefore,<br />
many concepts <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Section 1.1 have an alternative, so called holographic<br />
5D description, which may at first glance look like an entirely different <strong>the</strong>ory. So<br />
is for example <strong>the</strong> warped higgsless model dual to a walk<strong>in</strong>g TC <strong>the</strong>ory [63]. The<br />
warped version of a gauge-Higgs unification model is a dual description of a composite<br />
pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Higgs 19 [62, Sec.4] and <strong>the</strong> mechanism of collective<br />
symmetry break<strong>in</strong>g can be implemented by an enlarged bulk gauge group [60].<br />
It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note, that this dual description for <strong>the</strong> RS scenario, where gravity is<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk and <strong>the</strong> graviton can <strong>the</strong>refore be understood as a composite of <strong>the</strong> brane<br />
Yang-Mills <strong>the</strong>ory seem<strong>in</strong>gly contradicts a no-go <strong>the</strong>orem, <strong>the</strong> We<strong>in</strong>berg-Witten <strong>the</strong>orem<br />
[79]. It states among o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs, that a massless graviton cannot be a composite<br />
state. Very rem<strong>in</strong>iscent of <strong>the</strong> Coleman-Mandula <strong>the</strong>orem and SUSY, <strong>the</strong> AdS/CFT<br />
correspondence makes use of a loophole, because <strong>the</strong> 5D graviton can be described by<br />
a composite state on <strong>the</strong> four dimensional boundary, see [80] for details.<br />
19 An <strong>in</strong>dication of this relation may be that <strong>the</strong> extra-dimensional components of <strong>the</strong> gauge fields<br />
transforms under <strong>the</strong> 5D gauge symmetry like under a shift symmetry.