05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

action<br />

�<br />

S ∋ d 4 x r 2π<br />

� 1 dt<br />

L ɛ t<br />

�<br />

− 1<br />

4 FµνF µν − 1<br />

2ξ (∂µ Aµ) 2 + 1 �<br />

∂µA5∂<br />

2<br />

µ A5 + M 2 KK ∂tAµ∂tA µ�<br />

�<br />

∂µZ5∂ µ Z5 + M 2 KK ∂tZµ∂tZ µ�<br />

− 1<br />

4 ZµνZ µν − 1<br />

2ξ (∂µ Zµ) 2 + 1<br />

2<br />

− 1<br />

2 W + µνW −µν − 1<br />

+ k<br />

δ(t − 1)<br />

2<br />

− ξ<br />

�<br />

1<br />

MKK t∂t<br />

2<br />

− ξ<br />

�<br />

4<br />

2.3. Profiles of Gauge Bosons 67<br />

ξ ∂µ W + µ ∂ ν W − ν + � ∂µW + 5 ∂µ W − 5 + M 2 KK ∂tW + µ ∂tW −µ�<br />

� 1<br />

2 ∂µh∂ µ h − λv 2 h 2 + ∂µϕ + ∂ µ ϕ − + 1<br />

2 ∂µϕ3∂ µ ϕ3<br />

� 2<br />

− ξ<br />

�<br />

8<br />

+ M 2 Z<br />

2 ZµZ µ + M 2 W W + µ W −µ<br />

�2 t A5<br />

1<br />

δ(t − 1) kMZ ϕ3 + 2MKK t∂t<br />

t Z5<br />

δ(t − 1)kMW ϕ + ��<br />

1<br />

+ MKKt∂t δ(t − 1) kMW ϕ − 1<br />

+ MKKt∂t<br />

t W + 5<br />

In <strong>the</strong> next step, analogue to (2.88), we decompose <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>in</strong> KK modes,<br />

Aµ(x, t) = 1<br />

√ rc<br />

Zµ(x, t) = 1<br />

√ rc<br />

W ± µ (x, t) = 1<br />

√ rc<br />

�<br />

n<br />

�<br />

n<br />

�<br />

n<br />

A (n)<br />

µ (x) χ A n (t) , A5(x, t) = MKK<br />

√ rc<br />

Z (n)<br />

µ (x) χ Z n (t) , Z5(x, t) = MKK<br />

√ rc<br />

W ±(n)<br />

µ (x) χ W n (t) , W ± MKK<br />

5 (x, t) = √<br />

rc<br />

�<br />

n<br />

�<br />

n<br />

�<br />

n<br />

t W − 5<br />

a A n ϕ (n)<br />

A (x) ∂t χ A n (t) ,<br />

a Z n ϕ (n)<br />

Z (x) ∂t χ Z n (t) ,<br />

(2.98)<br />

�<br />

��<br />

.<br />

a W n ϕ ±(n)<br />

W (x) ∂t χ W n (t) ,<br />

(2.99)<br />

and expand <strong>the</strong> would-be Goldstone bosons <strong>in</strong> (2.96) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same basis of mass eigenstates<br />

as <strong>the</strong> scalars,<br />

ϕ ± (x) = �<br />

n<br />

b W n ϕ ±(n)<br />

W (x) , ϕ3(x) = �<br />

We obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EOM (2.91) with <strong>the</strong> replacement<br />

c 2 A → 1<br />

2 δ(t − 1− )k M 2 a<br />

M 2 KK<br />

n<br />

b Z n ϕ (n)<br />

Z (x) . (2.100)<br />

= δ(t − 1 − )L v2 4g2 4<br />

4M 2 , (2.101)<br />

KK<br />

where <strong>the</strong> last equality holds for Ma = MW and also for Ma = MZ, if g2 4<br />

by (g ′2<br />

4 + g2 4 ). In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g, we denote both fields by Ma, with <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

replacements for <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs implied. Consequentially, <strong>the</strong> orthonormality relation<br />

is replaced

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!