On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
action<br />
�<br />
S ∋ d 4 x r 2π<br />
� 1 dt<br />
L ɛ t<br />
�<br />
− 1<br />
4 FµνF µν − 1<br />
2ξ (∂µ Aµ) 2 + 1 �<br />
∂µA5∂<br />
2<br />
µ A5 + M 2 KK ∂tAµ∂tA µ�<br />
�<br />
∂µZ5∂ µ Z5 + M 2 KK ∂tZµ∂tZ µ�<br />
− 1<br />
4 ZµνZ µν − 1<br />
2ξ (∂µ Zµ) 2 + 1<br />
2<br />
− 1<br />
2 W + µνW −µν − 1<br />
+ k<br />
δ(t − 1)<br />
2<br />
− ξ<br />
�<br />
1<br />
MKK t∂t<br />
2<br />
− ξ<br />
�<br />
4<br />
2.3. Profiles of Gauge Bosons 67<br />
ξ ∂µ W + µ ∂ ν W − ν + � ∂µW + 5 ∂µ W − 5 + M 2 KK ∂tW + µ ∂tW −µ�<br />
� 1<br />
2 ∂µh∂ µ h − λv 2 h 2 + ∂µϕ + ∂ µ ϕ − + 1<br />
2 ∂µϕ3∂ µ ϕ3<br />
� 2<br />
− ξ<br />
�<br />
8<br />
+ M 2 Z<br />
2 ZµZ µ + M 2 W W + µ W −µ<br />
�2 t A5<br />
1<br />
δ(t − 1) kMZ ϕ3 + 2MKK t∂t<br />
t Z5<br />
δ(t − 1)kMW ϕ + ��<br />
1<br />
+ MKKt∂t δ(t − 1) kMW ϕ − 1<br />
+ MKKt∂t<br />
t W + 5<br />
In <strong>the</strong> next step, analogue to (2.88), we decompose <strong>the</strong> fields <strong>in</strong> KK modes,<br />
Aµ(x, t) = 1<br />
√ rc<br />
Zµ(x, t) = 1<br />
√ rc<br />
W ± µ (x, t) = 1<br />
√ rc<br />
�<br />
n<br />
�<br />
n<br />
�<br />
n<br />
A (n)<br />
µ (x) χ A n (t) , A5(x, t) = MKK<br />
√ rc<br />
Z (n)<br />
µ (x) χ Z n (t) , Z5(x, t) = MKK<br />
√ rc<br />
W ±(n)<br />
µ (x) χ W n (t) , W ± MKK<br />
5 (x, t) = √<br />
rc<br />
�<br />
n<br />
�<br />
n<br />
�<br />
n<br />
t W − 5<br />
a A n ϕ (n)<br />
A (x) ∂t χ A n (t) ,<br />
a Z n ϕ (n)<br />
Z (x) ∂t χ Z n (t) ,<br />
(2.98)<br />
�<br />
��<br />
.<br />
a W n ϕ ±(n)<br />
W (x) ∂t χ W n (t) ,<br />
(2.99)<br />
and expand <strong>the</strong> would-be Goldstone bosons <strong>in</strong> (2.96) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same basis of mass eigenstates<br />
as <strong>the</strong> scalars,<br />
ϕ ± (x) = �<br />
n<br />
b W n ϕ ±(n)<br />
W (x) , ϕ3(x) = �<br />
We obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> EOM (2.91) with <strong>the</strong> replacement<br />
c 2 A → 1<br />
2 δ(t − 1− )k M 2 a<br />
M 2 KK<br />
n<br />
b Z n ϕ (n)<br />
Z (x) . (2.100)<br />
= δ(t − 1 − )L v2 4g2 4<br />
4M 2 , (2.101)<br />
KK<br />
where <strong>the</strong> last equality holds for Ma = MW and also for Ma = MZ, if g2 4<br />
by (g ′2<br />
4 + g2 4 ). In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g, we denote both fields by Ma, with <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
replacements for <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs implied. Consequentially, <strong>the</strong> orthonormality relation<br />
is replaced