On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
100 Chapter 3. Solv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Flavor</strong> <strong>Problem</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Strongly</strong> <strong>Coupled</strong> <strong>Theories</strong><br />
negative, so that one f<strong>in</strong>ds to lead<strong>in</strong>g order (see [114] for details and <strong>the</strong> derivation)<br />
g b �<br />
L = − 1<br />
2 + s2 � �<br />
w<br />
1 +<br />
3<br />
m2 Z<br />
2M 2 F<br />
KK<br />
2 (cbL ) 5 + 2cbL<br />
3 + 2cbL 2(3 + 2cbL )<br />
�<br />
+ m2 b<br />
2M 2 �<br />
1 F 2 (cbR<br />
KK 1 − 2cbR<br />
)<br />
3 + 2cbR<br />
g b R = s2 w<br />
3<br />
− m2 b<br />
2M 2 KK<br />
Here, δg b R /δgb L<br />
�<br />
− 1 ,<br />
(3.15)<br />
�<br />
1 − m2 Z<br />
2M 2 F<br />
KK<br />
2 (cbR )<br />
�<br />
3c2 w<br />
3 + 2cbR s2 5 + 2cbR<br />
L −<br />
w 2(3 + 2cbR )<br />
��<br />
(3.16)<br />
⎡<br />
�<br />
⎣<br />
1 1<br />
1 − 2cbL F 2 (cbL ) − 1 + F 2 (cbL )<br />
�<br />
+<br />
3 + 2cbL<br />
� |(Yd)i3| 2<br />
|(Yd)33| 2<br />
1 1<br />
1 − 2cQi F 2 (cbL )<br />
⎤<br />
⎦ .<br />
> 1, and <strong>the</strong> right-handed corrections will lead to a worse <strong>the</strong>n 3σ<br />
discrepancy for some parameter po<strong>in</strong>ts. Despite <strong>the</strong> mislead<strong>in</strong>g scatterplot however,<br />
more than 99% of <strong>the</strong> parameter po<strong>in</strong>ts are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 3σ CL ellipsis <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.3.<br />
tend to slightly improve <strong>the</strong> sit-<br />
Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, with <strong>the</strong> new fit, <strong>the</strong> corrections to gb L<br />
uation compared to <strong>the</strong> SM. Both is evident from <strong>the</strong> plot on <strong>the</strong> right hand side<br />
of Figure 3.3, which shows <strong>the</strong> same set of parameter po<strong>in</strong>ts as <strong>the</strong> left plot for <strong>the</strong><br />
coupl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> custodially protected RS model (3.15) and (3.16). Note, that an<br />
improvement can be achieved for small MKK, which should be contrasted with <strong>the</strong><br />
model without custodial symmetry discussed above, <strong>in</strong> which a large new physics scale<br />
is preferred <strong>in</strong> order to not spoil <strong>the</strong> fit. Also, <strong>the</strong> reparametrization <strong>in</strong>variance can<br />
be used <strong>in</strong> favor of an IR shift of <strong>the</strong> left-handed profiles for even better agreement<br />
with <strong>the</strong> measurements. 2<br />
i=1,2<br />
This shows that <strong>the</strong> custodial protection is sufficient to protect <strong>the</strong> T parameter and<br />
allows for an even slight attenuation of <strong>the</strong> tension from <strong>the</strong> fit to R 0 b , , Ab and A 0,b<br />
FB .<br />
Even though o<strong>the</strong>r solutions exist, we will assume that <strong>the</strong> custodial protection <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
SM is not broken by <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ory, <strong>in</strong> order not to be pushed to a corner<br />
of parameter space or hav<strong>in</strong>g to resort to a large MKK scale for agreement with<br />
electroweak precision tests.<br />
3.2 RS GIM Work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
The present status of flavor physics is characterized by a large number of precision<br />
results on B, D and K decays which are <strong>in</strong> tantaliz<strong>in</strong>g agreement with <strong>the</strong> SM picture<br />
of flavor and CP violation. In <strong>the</strong> RS model, <strong>the</strong> KK modes generate tree-level<br />
FCNCs, which are ultimatively caused by <strong>the</strong> flavor non-universal coupl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> (1.34),<br />
and are suppressed by <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g angles <strong>in</strong> (1.34) or equivalently by <strong>the</strong> zero-mode<br />
profiles (2.150) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> RS-GIM mechanism.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g it will be demonstrated how <strong>the</strong> RS-GIM mechanism successfully suppresses<br />
FCNCs by us<strong>in</strong>g observables <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g b quarks, which have a large composite<br />
2 It should be po<strong>in</strong>ted out, that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> custodial model without <strong>the</strong> PLR symmetry, many parameter<br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts end up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2σ ellipsis <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.3. S<strong>in</strong>ce this is not a consequence of a physically motivated<br />
parameter choice, but depends on <strong>the</strong> random relative size of <strong>the</strong> right-handed localization parameters<br />
and Yukawa matrices, we will not discuss this scenario.