05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48 Chapter 2. The Randall Sundrum Model and its Holographic Interpretation<br />

γ ρ γ<br />

× ×<br />

ϕ O ϕ<br />

× ×<br />

Figure 2.2: Illustration of γ − ρ mix<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g of elementary and composite<br />

states <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dual <strong>the</strong>ory of <strong>the</strong> RS1 scenario.<br />

1<br />

1−|c−<br />

L ∋ Lel + ω M 2 | � ψ¯ 0<br />

LOR + h.c. � + LCFT , (2.43)<br />

where M ∼ ΛUV is of order Planck scale and c is <strong>the</strong> localization parameter of <strong>the</strong><br />

bulk field which is dual to OR(x). In this notation <strong>the</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g dimension of <strong>the</strong><br />

composite fermion operator reads dim OR(x) = 4 − 3/2 − 1 + |c − 1/2| = 3/2 +<br />

|c − 1/2|. After <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g an IR brane, and <strong>the</strong>refore spontaneous break<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

CFT, OR(x) represents a composite bound state <strong>in</strong> a strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory with a<br />

mass gap dictated by <strong>the</strong> IR scale ΛIR. In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g, we will <strong>the</strong>refore make use<br />

of <strong>the</strong> symbolic notation <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Section 1.1 and write <strong>the</strong> Lagrangian at <strong>the</strong><br />

compositeness scale ΛIR as<br />

L ∋ Lel + ω M<br />

� � 1<br />

|c−<br />

ΛIR<br />

2<br />

M<br />

| �<br />

¯ψ 0<br />

LOR + h.c. � + LCFT . (2.44)<br />

This corresponds to attribut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g scal<strong>in</strong>g dimension of <strong>the</strong> composite operator<br />

to <strong>the</strong> power law runn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory close to <strong>the</strong> conformal<br />

w<strong>in</strong>dow, compare [37, p.4-5]. With <strong>the</strong> identification<br />

γ = |c − 1/2| , (2.45)<br />

<strong>the</strong> Lagrangian (2.44) can now directly be compared to <strong>the</strong> Lagrangian (1.24), which<br />

shows how <strong>the</strong> localization <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk is connected to <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g between elementary<br />

and composite states. As illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.3, for a localization parameter<br />

c < −1/2, <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g operator becomes irrelevant and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>re is next to no<br />

mix<strong>in</strong>g between <strong>the</strong> CFT and <strong>the</strong> elementary sector. As a consequence, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mass<br />

eigenbasis, <strong>the</strong> light eigenstate will correspond to a mostly elementary field. This is<br />

<strong>the</strong> case for <strong>the</strong> light quarks and leptons <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> RS model with an IR localized Higgs.<br />

For a bulk mass −1/2 < c < 1/2, which corresponds to a IR localized fermion, <strong>the</strong><br />

mix<strong>in</strong>g becomes relevant and maximal mix<strong>in</strong>g is achieved for c = 1/2, which will be<br />

dual to roughly a 50% composite, 50% elementary eigenstate. From (2.44), one would<br />

expect, that even more IR localized fields <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g decreases aga<strong>in</strong>, however for<br />

localizations c > 1/2, <strong>the</strong> dual <strong>the</strong>ory will look different and (2.44) does not hold.<br />

We will not go <strong>in</strong>to detail concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> dual Lagrangian <strong>in</strong> this<br />

case, but refer to <strong>the</strong> relevant literature [104]. We note, that <strong>in</strong> this case <strong>the</strong> spectrum<br />

of <strong>the</strong> composite <strong>the</strong>ory conta<strong>in</strong>s a light field, with negligible admixture from<br />

<strong>the</strong> elementary sector, which <strong>in</strong> turn develops a mass term of <strong>the</strong> order of <strong>the</strong> cutoff.<br />

<strong>On</strong>e can <strong>the</strong>refore consider a fermion localized at c > 1/2 to be almost completely<br />

composite [91].<br />

This scenario is related to <strong>the</strong> two possible branches ∆± , which we found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scalar

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!