On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
48 Chapter 2. The Randall Sundrum Model and its Holographic Interpretation<br />
γ ρ γ<br />
× ×<br />
ϕ O ϕ<br />
× ×<br />
Figure 2.2: Illustration of γ − ρ mix<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g of elementary and composite<br />
states <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> dual <strong>the</strong>ory of <strong>the</strong> RS1 scenario.<br />
1<br />
1−|c−<br />
L ∋ Lel + ω M 2 | � ψ¯ 0<br />
LOR + h.c. � + LCFT , (2.43)<br />
where M ∼ ΛUV is of order Planck scale and c is <strong>the</strong> localization parameter of <strong>the</strong><br />
bulk field which is dual to OR(x). In this notation <strong>the</strong> scal<strong>in</strong>g dimension of <strong>the</strong><br />
composite fermion operator reads dim OR(x) = 4 − 3/2 − 1 + |c − 1/2| = 3/2 +<br />
|c − 1/2|. After <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g an IR brane, and <strong>the</strong>refore spontaneous break<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />
CFT, OR(x) represents a composite bound state <strong>in</strong> a strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory with a<br />
mass gap dictated by <strong>the</strong> IR scale ΛIR. In <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g, we will <strong>the</strong>refore make use<br />
of <strong>the</strong> symbolic notation <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Section 1.1 and write <strong>the</strong> Lagrangian at <strong>the</strong><br />
compositeness scale ΛIR as<br />
L ∋ Lel + ω M<br />
� � 1<br />
|c−<br />
ΛIR<br />
2<br />
M<br />
| �<br />
¯ψ 0<br />
LOR + h.c. � + LCFT . (2.44)<br />
This corresponds to attribut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> vary<strong>in</strong>g scal<strong>in</strong>g dimension of <strong>the</strong> composite operator<br />
to <strong>the</strong> power law runn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a strongly coupled <strong>the</strong>ory close to <strong>the</strong> conformal<br />
w<strong>in</strong>dow, compare [37, p.4-5]. With <strong>the</strong> identification<br />
γ = |c − 1/2| , (2.45)<br />
<strong>the</strong> Lagrangian (2.44) can now directly be compared to <strong>the</strong> Lagrangian (1.24), which<br />
shows how <strong>the</strong> localization <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk is connected to <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g between elementary<br />
and composite states. As illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.3, for a localization parameter<br />
c < −1/2, <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g operator becomes irrelevant and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>re is next to no<br />
mix<strong>in</strong>g between <strong>the</strong> CFT and <strong>the</strong> elementary sector. As a consequence, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mass<br />
eigenbasis, <strong>the</strong> light eigenstate will correspond to a mostly elementary field. This is<br />
<strong>the</strong> case for <strong>the</strong> light quarks and leptons <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> RS model with an IR localized Higgs.<br />
For a bulk mass −1/2 < c < 1/2, which corresponds to a IR localized fermion, <strong>the</strong><br />
mix<strong>in</strong>g becomes relevant and maximal mix<strong>in</strong>g is achieved for c = 1/2, which will be<br />
dual to roughly a 50% composite, 50% elementary eigenstate. From (2.44), one would<br />
expect, that even more IR localized fields <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g decreases aga<strong>in</strong>, however for<br />
localizations c > 1/2, <strong>the</strong> dual <strong>the</strong>ory will look different and (2.44) does not hold.<br />
We will not go <strong>in</strong>to detail concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> dual Lagrangian <strong>in</strong> this<br />
case, but refer to <strong>the</strong> relevant literature [104]. We note, that <strong>in</strong> this case <strong>the</strong> spectrum<br />
of <strong>the</strong> composite <strong>the</strong>ory conta<strong>in</strong>s a light field, with negligible admixture from<br />
<strong>the</strong> elementary sector, which <strong>in</strong> turn develops a mass term of <strong>the</strong> order of <strong>the</strong> cutoff.<br />
<strong>On</strong>e can <strong>the</strong>refore consider a fermion localized at c > 1/2 to be almost completely<br />
composite [91].<br />
This scenario is related to <strong>the</strong> two possible branches ∆± , which we found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scalar