On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
20 Chapter 1. Introduction: <strong>Problem</strong>s beyond <strong>the</strong> Standard Model<br />
Here {κ = (κ − , κ 0 ), �κ} and {h = (h − , h 0 ), η} denote each five Goldstone bosons from<br />
<strong>the</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g G/H. Now assume that <strong>the</strong> diagonal subgroup F = SU(3)diag of G is<br />
gauged, so that <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>etic part of (1.35) becomes<br />
Lk<strong>in</strong> = (Dµφ1) † (D µ φ1) + (Dµφ2) † (D µ φ2) (1.37)<br />
with Dµ = ∂µ − ig T a A a µ, a = 1, . . . , 8. This is an explicit break<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> subgroup H,<br />
so that only I = H ∩ F = SU(2)diag (generated by <strong>the</strong> T a s with <strong>the</strong> Pauli matrices<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper left corner) rema<strong>in</strong>s unbroken. The <strong>in</strong>teraction terms from (1.37) can be<br />
written as<br />
�<br />
i<br />
�<br />
|Dµφi| ∋ Tr g 2 (A a µT a ) 2 (φ1φ † †<br />
1 + φ2φ 2 )<br />
�<br />
, (1.38)<br />
where g is <strong>the</strong> weak coupl<strong>in</strong>g constant <strong>in</strong> this model and (ignor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>glet η)<br />
φ1φ † †<br />
1 + φ2φ 2 =<br />
�<br />
h † h<br />
0<br />
0<br />
f 2 − h † �<br />
.<br />
h<br />
(1.39)<br />
And, if we denote <strong>the</strong> new gauge bosons by X and <strong>the</strong> SM ones as usual, we f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> mass eigenbasis<br />
so that<br />
A a µT a = 1<br />
√ 2<br />
�<br />
Tr g 2 (A a µT a ) 2 (φ1φ † †<br />
1 + φ2φ 2 )<br />
�<br />
⎛<br />
B<br />
⎜<br />
⎝<br />
0 µ + X8 µ<br />
√3<br />
W − µ<br />
X 0<br />
µ<br />
W + µ<br />
X 8 µ<br />
√3 − B 0 µ<br />
X + µ<br />
X 0 µ<br />
X − µ<br />
−2<br />
√ 3 X 8 µ<br />
= g2<br />
�<br />
2 8<br />
f<br />
2 3 X8 µX µ8 + X 0<br />
µX µ0 + X + µ X µ−<br />
�<br />
⎞<br />
⎟<br />
⎠ , (1.40)<br />
+ g2<br />
2 h2 � W + µ W µ− + 2B 0 µB µ0 − X + µ X µ− − 2X 8 µX µ8�<br />
+ 2g2<br />
√ 3 h 2 X 8 µB µ0 . (1.41)<br />
Two th<strong>in</strong>gs become evident from this result. First, <strong>the</strong> five gauge bosons correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to <strong>the</strong> broken T a s, a = 1, . . . , 5 have eaten <strong>the</strong> κ fields from (1.36) and ga<strong>in</strong> masses<br />
proportional to <strong>the</strong> scale f, while <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g three gauge bosons will become<br />
massive if <strong>the</strong> Higgs field h acquires a vev. Second, <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>gs to <strong>the</strong> Higgs <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> second l<strong>in</strong>e of (1.41) are of <strong>the</strong> same magnitude but of opposite sign between <strong>the</strong><br />
new gauge fields and <strong>the</strong> weak gauge fields. This leads to a cancellation (between<br />
equal sp<strong>in</strong> fields), which will assure that no quadratic divergent loop diagrams appear<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory. The reason is, that if one covariant derivative <strong>in</strong> (1.37) was replaced<br />
by Dµ → ∂µ, all GBs of <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g scalar would be exact. Thus, only gauge<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g both scalars φ1 and φ2 break <strong>the</strong> shift symmetry and can give