On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
148 Chapter 4. The Asymmetry <strong>in</strong> Top Pair Production<br />
Even though it cannot be transformed <strong>in</strong> a forward-backward asymmetry1 , <strong>the</strong> charge<br />
asymmetry at <strong>the</strong> LHC has <strong>the</strong> same physical orig<strong>in</strong> and possible new physics effects<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>in</strong> At FB will also contribute to Ay<br />
C . It has been measured at <strong>the</strong> LHC by<br />
both ATLAS [217, 218] and CMS [216] and was found to be <strong>in</strong> good agreement with<br />
<strong>the</strong> SM [219],<br />
(A y<br />
C )SM = (1.15 ± 0.6) % , (4.14)<br />
(A y<br />
C )exp = (0.4 ± 1stat ± 1.1syst) % . (4.15)<br />
Here, <strong>the</strong> quoted experimental value corresponds to <strong>the</strong> latest CMS result, which is<br />
based on 5fb −1 of data. The fact that <strong>the</strong> asymmetry at <strong>the</strong> LHC is considerably<br />
smaller than at <strong>the</strong> Tevatron is rooted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> different center of mass energies (CM)<br />
of both mach<strong>in</strong>es. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> asymmetries are normalized to <strong>the</strong> total <strong>in</strong>clusive cross<br />
section, <strong>the</strong> number of top pairs produced by gluon-gluon fusion contributes to <strong>the</strong><br />
denom<strong>in</strong>ator but not to <strong>the</strong> numerator as it is a charge symmetric <strong>in</strong>itial state and at<br />
LHC energies gluon-gluon fusion is by far <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g process.<br />
We can conclude, that whatever new physics might be responsible for <strong>the</strong> discrepancy<br />
seen at <strong>the</strong> Tevatron, its contribution to <strong>the</strong> LHC charge asymmetry should stay with<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> (still significant) errors. It should fur<strong>the</strong>r not contribute to <strong>the</strong> total <strong>in</strong>clusive cross<br />
section which all experiments see <strong>in</strong> very good agreement with SM predictions, and it<br />
must be heavy or broad enough to have escaped direct detection by dijet searches or<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> t¯t <strong>in</strong>variant mass spectrum so far.<br />
4.2 The Forward-Backward Asymmetry <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SM<br />
We will concentrate on <strong>the</strong> Tevatron observables at which t¯t pairs are produced <strong>in</strong> collisions<br />
of protons and antiprotons, p¯p → t¯tX. At <strong>the</strong> partonic Born-level contributions<br />
from quark-antiquark annihilation and gluon fusion arise with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SM<br />
q<br />
¯q ¯t<br />
q(p1) + ¯q(p2) → t(p3) + ¯t(p4) ,<br />
t<br />
g<br />
g ¯t<br />
g(p1) + g(p2) → t(p3) + ¯t(p4) ,<br />
t<br />
(4.16)<br />
<strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> four-momenta p1,2 of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial state partons can be expressed as <strong>the</strong><br />
fractions x1,2 of <strong>the</strong> four-momenta P1,2 of <strong>the</strong> collid<strong>in</strong>g hadrons, p1,2 = x1,2P1,2. We<br />
denote <strong>the</strong> square of <strong>the</strong> hadronic CM energy by s = (P1 + P2) 2 and <strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>the</strong><br />
1 For more details concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> different asymmetries and <strong>the</strong>ir comparability, see e.g. [220].