05.01.2013 Views

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

On the Flavor Problem in Strongly Coupled Theories - THEP Mainz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Preface<br />

Before <strong>the</strong> advent of <strong>the</strong> Standard Model,<br />

physicists had become used to experiments<br />

produc<strong>in</strong>g unexpected new particles or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

signposts to a new <strong>the</strong>ory almost before <strong>the</strong><br />

chalk dust had settled on <strong>the</strong> old one. They have<br />

been wait<strong>in</strong>g 30 years for that to happen with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Standard Model.<br />

Gordon Kane<br />

When Gordon Kane wrote this statement seven years ago, despite its success, one<br />

crucial <strong>in</strong>gredient of <strong>the</strong> Standard Model (SM) was still miss<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> Higgs boson. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has started runn<strong>in</strong>g, and essentially<br />

rediscovered every known particle <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SM and noth<strong>in</strong>g else, but one scalar resonance<br />

at roughly 126 GeV. If this scalar is <strong>the</strong> Higgs, one can conclude from vacuum<br />

stability bounds, that its mass nicely agrees with <strong>the</strong> SM as a complete <strong>the</strong>ory of nongravitational<br />

forces up to almost <strong>the</strong> Planck scale. At this po<strong>in</strong>t, its coupl<strong>in</strong>gs are not<br />

measured with an accuracy that would allow it to identify <strong>the</strong> SM Higgs with all its<br />

predicted characteristics. However, one can already say that electroweak symmetry<br />

break<strong>in</strong>g (EWSB), as it is described by <strong>the</strong> SM, is <strong>the</strong> correct low energy <strong>the</strong>ory. The<br />

desert of scales above <strong>the</strong> electroweak scale that <strong>the</strong> LHC beg<strong>in</strong>s to explore, lets one<br />

wonder how many orders of magnitude this “low” energy description actually covers.<br />

Thus, from an experimental po<strong>in</strong>t of view, <strong>the</strong> SM is a success. Theoretically, <strong>the</strong> LHC<br />

measurements have made <strong>the</strong> questions left open by <strong>the</strong> SM only more press<strong>in</strong>g. This<br />

<strong>the</strong>sis will address two of <strong>the</strong> most puzzl<strong>in</strong>g ones: What sets <strong>the</strong> electroweak scale,<br />

and what is <strong>the</strong> reason for <strong>the</strong> hierarchies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> masses and mix<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> quarks?<br />

The first question has been <strong>the</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g force for build<strong>in</strong>g models of physics beyond<br />

<strong>the</strong> SM for decades. In <strong>the</strong> SM, <strong>the</strong> electroweak scale is a free parameter and unstable<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st radiative corrections. It must <strong>the</strong>refore be f<strong>in</strong>e-tuned to a large degree <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to agree with <strong>the</strong> experiment, unless some symmetry or mechanism protects it from<br />

<strong>the</strong>se radiative corrections.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> first part of <strong>the</strong> Chapter 1, a survey of ideas that can solve this problem will<br />

be presented. The emphasis will be put on <strong>the</strong>ories which assume <strong>the</strong> Higgs to be a<br />

strongly coupled bound state by some new force. If <strong>the</strong> LHC cont<strong>in</strong>ues to set better<br />

and better exclusion limits on new resonances, this explanation becomes attractive,<br />

because <strong>the</strong> Goldstone bosons of QCD are roughly an order of magnitude lighter than<br />

its characteristic scale and <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> Higgs mass and <strong>the</strong> mass of<br />

possible new resonances could be expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a similar way. As will be expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>the</strong>re, <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ories are generically <strong>in</strong> conflict with bounds from flavor observables,<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y allow for flavor chang<strong>in</strong>g neutral currents (FCNCs) at tree level. It will<br />

be shown that, if fermions are partially composite fields, one can avoid most of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

bounds, and also f<strong>in</strong>ds an explanation for <strong>the</strong> hierarchies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> quark sector. Quark<br />

masses and mix<strong>in</strong>gs are also unmotivated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SM, and models which can expla<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m are <strong>the</strong> subject of <strong>the</strong> second part of <strong>the</strong> first chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!